Richard J. Mangan
Program Leader
USDA Forest Service
Technology and Development Program
Missoula, Montana
TE02P16-Tech Services-Fire Aviation Management
5100 Fire
February 2000
0051-2811-MTDC
With lands in the wildland-urban intermix continuing to increase, it is time to clearly define all the groups involved in these areas, and to identify the factors that must be addressed to ensure firefighter safety when the inevitable wildland-urban intermix fires do occur.
Figure 1-A firefighter removes hose while fighting a wildland-urban intermix fire in San Diego County (Los Angeles Times Syndicate Photo,
Don Barletti).
Figure 2-A variety of factors influence firefighter safety.
Perhaps the most important function the
community can play to ensure firefighter
safety is through planning. By requiring
developers and builders to adhere to
strict standards for building materials,
clearing limits, and fire-resistant plant
species for landscaping, the community
can help ensure that firefighters have a
reasonable chance to safely fight a fire
(Figure 3).
Figure 3-Planning is the first step to making a home site in the wildland-urban intermix safe from wildland fire.
Other important roles for the community include enforcing existing ordinances for vegetation, conducting fire prevention inspections on a timely basis, and enforcing the approved standards for fire-safe building construction practices.
Access is a critical component of suppressing any fire, and becomes even more critical in wildland-urban intermix fires. Road width, traffic flow, curve radius, and bridge weight limits all impact the timeliness and ability of fire apparatus to reach a fire, or to gain access to protect a structure. Careful consideration of design criteria to match roads with access and egress needs of the civilian population as well as the needs of fire equipment are essential during the early stages of an area's development.
Once residences are in place, the community is responsible for developing fully integrated evacuation plans for the civilian population should a fire occur, and for coordinating the efforts of fire control and law enforcement to ensure that both are able to achieve their objectives in a timely manner.
Figure 4-Defensible space around a home helps ensure firefighter safety.
Even though these steps and the actions of the community should greatly reduce the risk of wildfire threat to homeowners in the intermix, homeowners have one additional responsibility: planning for evacuation in times of extreme fire behavior. Homeowners must maintain accountability for all family members, remove important papers and family heirlooms, evacuate pets and livestock, and know the best transportation routes away from the fire. All these aspects of evacuation must be planned by the homeowner long before the threat of fire. Failure to do so will delay evacuation, and may threaten the safety of firefighters trying to access the area to suppress the fire, protect property, or save the lives of entrapped residents.
First, the training and qualifications of firefighters and fire officers must be focused for the wildland fire suppression job. These skills are often significantly different than those required in the structural fire arena. Failure to address those differences can result in close calls, injuries, and even fatalities because threats are not recognized. Fire agencies can address these requirements by referring to both ICS 310-1 (Incident Command System Wildland Fire Qualification Subsystem Guide) and NFPA 1051 (National Fire Protection Association Standard for Wildland Fire Fighter Professional Qualifications). Recognition of the effects of the weather, terrain, and fuels on fire behavior and the effectiveness of suppression activities is especially critical in the wildfire environment. Also, chief officers in traditional structural fire agencies often are not trained in wildland operations to the level that a wildland firefighting division supervisor might be: assigning individuals in critical positions who were not qualified or experienced in wildfire has resulted in firefighter burnovers and entrapments (Figure 5).
Figure 5-Wildland firefighting has specific requirements for training and equipment.
The equipment selected by the fire agency for the wildfire component of their fire protection responsibility is also an important factor in firefighter safety. Engines and other apparatus that cannot maneuver on narrow, curving roads, or that exceed the load limits on bridges can put firefighters at risk in fast-moving wildfires (Figure 6). Close coordination by the fire agency with the community to adapt the transportation system and new equipment to meet the existing and planned conditions is important in ensure that firefighters can safely perform on an intermix fire.
Figure 6-The size and weight of firefighting apparatus can present problems for
firefighters in the wildland-urban intermix.
Communications have always been identified as a critical component in firefighter safety. The 18 Situations That Shout Watch Out, 10 Standard Fire Orders, Downhill Line Construction Guidelines and L.C.E.S. (Lookouts, Communications, Escape Routes and Safety Zones) all include communications as a cornerstone. In the wildland-urban intermix environment, the capability of a communications system to function across jurisdictional boundaries is even more critical. These fires nearly always involve numerous fire agencies, often operating under a unified command structure. Agencies must provide their firefighters with communications systems capable of functioning in these environments. Failure to do so threatens firefighters' safety and limits their ability to perform effectively. Communications failures or overload have been identified as a serious problem on both the Oakland Hills Fire and the Spokane, Washington, Fire Storm Fires in 1991, and as a causal factor of the 1993 Glenallen Fire fatalities in Los Angeles County.
Personal protective equipment affects the firefighter in several ways in the wildland-urban intermix. The necessary level of protection from radiant heat must be balanced against the risk of heat stress from too many layers of protective clothing. While most agencies are feeling the pressure of reduced budgets, it is essential that firefighters be supplied with the proper protective clothing and equipment. NFPA 1977 Standard on Protective Clothing and Equipment for Wildland Fire Fighting, (Figure 7) specifies the performance and design requirements for wildland fire Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). Wildland fire PPE generally is not interchangeable with the PPE needed for structural fire suppression. High temperatures, low humidity, and high levels of physical activity are extremely demanding on firefighters. Their protective clothing and equipment should not increase the heat stress. Australian studies on "Project Aquarius" emphasize that wildland PPE should be designed "to let the heat out, not keep the heat out."
Figure 7-National Fire Protection Association Standard 1977 sets the requirements for
wildland fire personal protective equipment.
Fire shelters may be the most critical piece of PPE for firefighter safety in the wildland-urban intermix. Although the fire shelter is intended as a tool of last resort, it has saved the lives of hundreds of firefighters in both the wildland and wildland-urban intermix environments. Fire agencies must provide all firefighters who may be working in the wildland-urban intermix with both the fire shelter and the training needed to use it as intended.
Physical fitness, the physical ability to do the job at hand, is another key area where fire agencies can have a positive influence on firefighter safety (Figure 8). Management support for individual firefighter fitness will help reduce heat stress injuries and heart attacks, while increasing firefighters' ability to move quickly along escape routes to safety zones. Heart attacks were among the leading causes of firefighter fatalities on both wildfires and structural fires during the 1990's.
Figure 8-Physical fitness is essential to
safe operations on all wildfires.
The last area where the fire agency has a major role in firefighter safety is in developing policies and standard operating procedures (SOP's) specific to the wildland-urban intermix fire operations. Because these intermix fires may not be a daily occurrence for some fire agencies, it is essential that their firefighters have clear direction when these events do occur. Specific items included in these policies and SOP's must include chain of command, communications practices and frequencies (including interagency coordination), suppression priorities, and safety practices. A critical question that must be addressed in training deals with the best place to survive a burnover or entrapment: in an engine cab or in a fire shelter. Firefighters were forced to make split-second decisions to deploy fire shelters or remain with their engines during several entrapments in Southern California during 1993 and 1996. Those choices should be well explained in department policy, and reinforced through training, long before firefighters have to make such a decision.
Figure 9-Heart attacks are a leading cause of death for wildland firefighters.
All firefighters, regardless of their position in the fire organization, must do all they can to foster communications with other individuals above and below them. The constant, open channel of communications established in ordinary circumstances will be especially important when conditions develop that are out of the ordinary, or that may become life threatening. Firefighter safety is enhanced when all members of a fire crew can offer observations or share concerns about developing situations (Figure 10).
Figure 10-Maintaining constant communications is a cornerstone of fire safety.
Figure 11-During a fire a number of interacting factors affect firefighter safety.
Figure 12-Power lines can be a safety hazard in the wildland-urban intermix.
Figure 13-Selecting proper equipment is a key to safe operations.
Figure 14-Protective clothing must be
appropriate for the fire, and must be used as
intended.
Failure to adequately plan and execute the steps necessary to ensure firefighter safety in the wildland-urban intermix has resulted in close calls, injuries, and even fatalities across the United States:
Figure 15-Fatalities have occurred on fires in the wildland-urban intermix across the
United States.
Figure 16-The results of the 1991 East Bay Firestorm in Oakland, CA. Photos used with
permission of the Oakland Tribune. Before: Robert Warwick, After: Michael Macor.
Butler, Bret W.; Bartlette, Roberta A.; Bradshaw, Larry S.; Cohen, Jack D.; Andrews, Patricia L.; Putnam, Ted; Mangan, Richard J. 1998. Fire behavior associated with the 1994 South Canyon Fire on Storm King Mountain, Colorado. Res. Pap. RMRS-RP-9. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 82 p.
Hawkins, John R. 1996. Save the structure, but don't get killed. Fire Chief. June: 43-50.
International Fire Code Institute. 1997. 1997 Urban-wildand interface code: first edition. Whittier, CA: International Fire Code Institute. 49 p.
Mangan Richard. 1999. Wildland fire fatalities in the United States: 1990 to 1998. Tech. Rep. 9951-2808-MTDC. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center. 14 p.
National Fire Protection Association. 1995. NFPA 1051 standard for wildland fire fighter professional qualifications: 1995 edition. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association. 22 p.
National Fire Protection Association. 1998. NFPA 1977 standard on protective clothing and equipment for wildland fire fighting: 1998 edition. Quincy, MA: National Fire Protection Association. 70 p.
National Wildland/Urban Interface Fire Protection Program. 1997. National Wildland/Urban Interface Fire Protection Program. 16 p.
North Idaho Fire Prevention Cooperatives. 1990. Wildfire and the suburban home: a formula for disaster! Bonners Ferry, ID: The North Idaho Fire Prevention Cooperatives of Boundary, Bonner, Kootenai, Shoshone, and Benewah Counties. 23 p.
Plevel, Steve Randolph. 1996. Factors affecting local government adoption of wildland-urban interface fire policies. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona. 73 p. Thesis.
Sharkey, Brian. 1997. Fitness and work capacity, second edition. Tech. Rep. 9751-2814-MTDC. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Missoula Technology and Development Center. 78 p.
Western Fire Chiefs Association. 1991. Development strategies in the wildland/urban interface. Billings, MT: International Association of Fire Chiefs and Western Fire Chiefs Association. 213 p.
USDA Forest Service
Missoula Technology and Development Center
Building 1, Fort Missoula
Missoula, MT 59804-7294
Phone: (406) 329-3978
Fax: (406) 329-3719
E-mail: pubs_wo_mtdc@fs.fed.us
For additional technical information, contact Dick Mangan at the address above.
Phone: (406) 329-3849
Fax: (406) 329-3719
This manuscript was presented at the symposium on Fire in California Ecosystems: Integrating Ecology, Prevention, and Management, November 17-20, 1997, University of California, Davis. Disclaimer
The Forest Service, United States Department of Agriculture, has developed this information for the guidance of its employees, its contractors, and its cooperating Federal and State agencies, and is not responsible for the interpretation or use of this information by anyone except its own employees. The use of trade, firm, or corporation names in this publication is for the information and convenience of the reader, and does not constitute an endorsement by the Department of any product or service to the exclusion of others that may be suitable. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, and marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, and so forth) should phone USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write: USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call (202) 720-5964 (voice or TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
Visitor
since March 12, 2002