Dan W. McCollum
240 West Prospect Road
Contact Dan W. McCollum
- Biochar from Biomass: A Process for Utilizing Forest Treatment & Mill Residues.
- Social and Economic Aspects of Biomass Utilization and the National Forests.
- Beliefs and Attitudes toward Public Land Use and Management, and Economic Development in Mineral County, Montana.
- The Route of the Hiawatha Trail and Its Extension to St. Regis: Biking and Tourism as Components of Economic Development.
- Ecotourism in the Kamchatka Region of Russia.
My research focuses broadly on economic valuation of nonmarket goods and natural resources. That includes (1) the measurement of net value or net benefits received from natural resource use (an economic efficiency perspective) and (2) measuring economic activity associated with a particular good/service/activity, and studying how benefits and economic activity accrue to groups or sectors within the economy (an economic distribution or equity perspective). More recent work has been aimed at more effectively incorporating the public and their preferences into land management planning deliberations and decisions. These lines of research are applied to national forests and the diversity of their uses.
A hundred years of fire suppression, combined with several years of drought conditions, has led to forests that are overly dense, susceptible to disease and insect infestation, and pose an increased risk of catastrophic wildfire. Biomass removal is needed to: (1) restore and/or improve forest health; (2) reduce the risk of catastrophic wildfire; (3) reduce hazards resulting from insect and disease killed trees; among other things. Biomass removal is expensive. When the dominant material harvested is small diameter, so high value saw logs are scarce, and markets for wood products are down, it is not profitable for contractors to bid on many timber sales and forest treatment projects. Coupled with that is the disposal problem associated with residual material from biomass removal. It is costly to haul away, and burning in place presents problems. Anything that results in value-added products from biomass, and especially from residual materials, enhances the feasibility of biomass removal and treatment projects. Utilization of biomass also offers potential benefits for rural economic development. In order to use biomass to achieve these benefits, we must learn about the range of uses and products that can come from woody biomass and how they might enter into society's broad market.
Why This Research is Important
- An edited volume, 'Valuing Wildlife Resources in Alaska', bringing together perspectives and methods of economic analysis that provide natural resource managers and planners with the information they need to make management and policy decisions.
- A series of studies on wildlife use and its contribution to Alaska and the Alaskan economy. The studies include net economic values and contributions to economic activity of resident and nonresident wildlife users in consumptive and non-consumptive activities.
- An Integrated Social, Economic, and Ecologic Conceptual (ISEEC) Framework for Considering Rangeland Sustainability.
- 'Economic Analysis in Support of National Forest Planning' involved a region-wide survey in the Southwest Region (Region 3: Arizona, New Mexico, and bits of Oklahoma and Texas) related to people's attitudes, preferences, and objectives related to national forests and their use and management.
- A Survey of Colorado Anglers and Their Willingness to Pay Increased License Fees.
- The Net Economic Value of Recreation on the National Forests: Twelve Types of Primary Activity Trips Across Nine Forest Service Regions.
- Illinois Institute of Technology; University of Illinois-Chicago, B.S. Economics and Biology 1976
- University of Wisconsin, M.S. Economics 1981
- University of Wisconsin, Ph.D. Economics 1986
Featured Publications & Products
- Price, James I.; McCollum, Daniel W.; Berrens, Robert P. 2010. Insect infestation and residential property values: A hedonic analysis of the mountain pine beetle epidemic.
- Watson, Alan; Ostergren, Dave; Fix, Peter; Overbaugh, Bill; McCollum, Dan; Kruger, Linda, Ph.D..; Madsen, Martha; Yang, He. 2009. Protecting ecotourism resources in a time of rapid economic and environmental transformation in Asia.
- McCollum, Daniel W.; Lundquist, John E. 2019. Bark beetle infestation of western US forests: A context for assessing and evaluating impacts.
- Mccollum, Daniel W.; Tanaka, John A.; Morgan, Jack A.; Mitchell, John E.; Fox, William E.; Maczko, Kristie A.; Hidinger, Lori; Duke, Clifford S.; Kreuter, Urs P. 2017. Climate change effects on rangelands and rangeland management: Affirming the need for monitoring.
- Tabatabaei, Maryam; Loomis, John B.; McCollum, Daniel W. 2015. Nonmarket benefits of reducing environmental effects of potential wildfires in beetle-killed trees: A contingent valuation study.
- Miller, Sue; Essen, Maureen; Anderson, Nathaniel; Page-Dumroese, Deborah; McCollum, Dan; Bergman, Rick; Elder, Tom. 2015. Science You Can Use Bulletin: Burgeoning biomass: Creating efficient and sustainable forest biomass supply chains in the Rockies, Part II.
- Prera, Alejandro J.; Grimsrud, Kristine M.; Thacher, Jennifer A.; McCollum, Dan W.; Berrens, Robert P. 2014. Using canonical correlation analysis to identify environmental attitude groups: Considerations for national forest planning in the southwestern U.S.
- Anderson, Nathaniel; Jones, J. Greg; Page-Dumroese, Deborah; McCollum, Daniel; Baker, Stephen; Loeffler, Daniel; Chung, Woodam. 2013. A comparison of producer gas, biochar, and activated carbon from two distributed scale thermochemical conversion systems used to process forest biomass.
- Kreuter, Urs P.; Fox, William E.; Tanaka, John A.; Maczko, Kristie A.; McCollum, Daniel W.; Mitchell, John E.; Duke, Clifford S.; Hidinger, Lori. 2012. Framework for comparing ecosystem impacts of developing unconventional energy resources on western US rangelands.
- Maczko, Kristie; Tanaka, John A.; Breckenridge, Robert; Hidinger, Lori; Heintz, H. Theodore; Fox, William E.; Kreuter, Urs P.; Duke, Clifford S.; Mitchell, John E.; McCollum, Daniel W. 2011. Rangeland ecosystem goods and services: Values and evaluation of opportunities for ranchers and land managers.
- McCollum, Daniel W.; Swanson, Louis E.; Tanaka, John A.; Brunson, Mark W.; Harp, Aaron J.; Torell, L. Allen; Heintz, H. Theodore, Jr. 2010. Criterion IV: Social and economic indicators of rangeland sustainability (Chapter 5).
- Fox, William E.; McCollum, Daniel W.; Mitchell, John E.; Swanson, Louis E.; Kreuter, Urs P.; Tanaka, John A.; Evans, Gary R.; Theodore Heintz, H.; Breckenridge, Robert P.; Geissler, Paul H. 2009. An Integrated Social, Economic, and Ecologic Conceptual (ISEEC) framework for considering rangeland sustainability.
|Producing biochar from forest biomass|
All that dead wood in our forests can be used to make charcoal, synthetic gas, and even fuel for our vehicles.