KEY POINTS for the SUPPLEMENTAL DRAFT EIS
Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project March 2000
The Interior Columbia Basin Ecosystem Management Project (Project) is releasing a Supplemental Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for public review and comment. The Supplemental Draft EIS includes three alternatives for managing Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management lands in eastern Washington and Oregon, Idaho and western Montana.
The Project looks forward to sharing the Supplemental Draft EIS with the public and getting feedback. The comment period will last 90 days.
The Supplemental Draft EIS supplements the Draft EISs the Project released for public comment in June of 1997 (Upper Columbia Draft EIS and the Eastside Draft EIS). The Supplemental Draft EIS was prepared based on the thousands of public comments received on the Draft EISs, agency input and new scientific information. The Supplemental Draft EIS focuses on providing management guidance for addressing fish and wildlife species habitat, landscape health, and socioeconomic issues. These issues cross administrative boundaries and will benefit from a coordinated, regional approach.
The Project is also releasing a report that was required by Congress through the 2000 Interior and Related Agencies Appropriation Act (Section 335). This report: outlines the land and resource management decisions to be made consistent with the Project's Final EIS; provides an estimate of the time and cost of each of these decisions; estimates the production of goods and services from the federal lands managed by the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management; and describes the decision making process to be used to establish priorities in accordance with funding levels. The Congress required a 120-day public comment period on the report and that the response to the comments be included in the Final EIS for the project.
Of the three management alternatives outlined in the Supplemental Draft EIS, Alternative S2 has been identified as the preferred alternative. The Preferred Alternative was selected by the regional executives who are responsible for the project. These executives represent the Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and the Environmental Protection Agency.
The regional executives have identified Alternative S2 as the preferred alternative because it provides the best strategy for managing public lands in the interior Columbia River Basin. Alternative S2 provides a vision of public land health and a blueprint for achieving it.
The strategy in Alternative S2 is a long-term strategy that integrates and focuses on the critical and compelling basin-wide resource and social economic issues. It recognizes the diversity of the basin, the complexity of the forest and rangeland health problems facing federal lands, the needs of tribes and local communities, and the fact that budget levels for dealing with these weighty issues is not likely to increase.
Need for the Supplemental Draft EIS
Improving the health of the Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management administrated lands in the basin is not going to be easy. Human uses and past management practices have significantly altered the dynamic processes of fire, drought, and vegetation that once worked together to promote healthy forests, grasslands and fish and wildlife in the basin. Habitat is fragmented and many of the plants and animals that have historically called the basin home are in decline.
Addressing these downward trends to achieve a more sustainable, healthy landscape in the future will be difficult. Just leaving things alone will not work. Science has underscored the need for restoration of roads that are bleeding sediment, of streambanks that are eroding, of forests at risk of uncharacteristic wildfire and disease, and rangelands infested with noxious weeds. Current policies and interim direction for such things as anadromous fish and old forests are only stop-gap measures. A long-term, comprehensive strategy is needed.
The lands in the Columbia Basin were shaped by strong forces of nature that have been altered. Active restoration is needed to promote the health of forests, rangelands and aquatic systems and the species that depend on them. Science and results of management efforts have shown that reintroducing fire to the ecosystem through prescribed fire, removing noxious weeds, eliminating roads, and thinning unhealthy and diseased forests are steps that must be taken to promote such things as salmon recovery and the conservation of forests and rangelands so that human uses can be sustained into the future.
For those areas where there are old forests, clear streams and healthy grasslands, these conditions need to be maintained and protected. The Preferred Alternative provides a basin-wide blueprint for both restoration and protection.
Ecosystems must be healthy, diverse, and productive to meet the needs of society today as well as those of future generations. Restoring and maintaining ecosystem health and ecological integrity will better support the economic and/or social needs of people, cultures, and communities. One of the primary objectives of the Preferred Alternative is to support the economic and/or social needs of people, cultures, and communities, through the availability of sustainable and predictable levels of products and services from Forest Service and BLM-administered lands.
How the Preferred Alternative Works
Base Level Direction
The Preferred Alternative provides base line standards and objectives for aquatic and terrestrial species, forest and rangeland health, and socioeconomics that apply to all federal lands in the basin. By looking across Forest Service and Bureau of Land Management boundaries and recognizing the interconnections of the different landscape elements - this base level direction provides managers and the public with a clear vision of basin-wide ecosystem health and the tools necessary to achieve it.
Restoration direction guides restoration work throughout the basin and in specific subbasins which have been identified as High Priority Restoration Subbasins. These subbasins are areas where restoration is most likely to achieve the greatest ecological benefits. This restoration work will be focused first in areas near isolated and economically-specialized rural and tribal communities that are in need of economic stimulus. This prioritization of restoration assists in targeting limited funds to those areas where there are the greatest risks and the greatest opportunities for making a difference. The benefits of restoration include improving aquatic and terrestrial species and habitats, forests and rangelands, and wherever possible the economic vitality and well being of local communities.
Aquatic A1 Subwatershed, Aquatic A2 Subwatershed, Terrestrial (T) Watershed Direction
In addition to the fish and wildlife habitat direction found in the base level and restoration direction, the Preferred Alternative provides further protection of fish and wildlife species habitat through the identification of Aquatic A1 Subwatershed, Aquatic A2 Subwatershed and Terrestrial (T) Watershed areas where additional management standards and objectives apply.
For Aquatic A1 Subwatersheds, the intent is to conserve and maintain subwatershed and aquatic habitat conditions, processes and functions. Any activities occurring in these areas must maintain or achieve aquatic/riparian/hydrologic objectives. Road building is prohibited in the first ten years of implementation. There are 6.7 million acres of Aquatic A1 Subwatersheds in the project area (3.4 million acres are within Congressionally designated Wilderness Areas or Wilderness Study Areas).
For Aquatic A2 Subwatersheds, the intent is to maintain and improve (restore) subwatershed and aquatic habitat conditions, processes and functions. In Aquatic A2 Subwatersheds the direction calls for restoration, such as reducing adverse road effects, to improve aquatic habitat conditions. There are 6.8 million acres of Aquatic A2 Subwatersheds in the project area.
For Terrestrial (T) Watersheds, the intent is to maintain and secure terrestrial wildlife species habitats that have declined significantly over time and are in short supply; and to increase the extent and connectivity of these "source" habitats within T Watersheds. These habitat types include old-forests, riparian areas, sagebrush and grasslands. Any activities occurring in these T Watersheds must maintain or achieve terrestrial habitat objectives. Road building is prohibited in the first ten years of implementation unless needed to secure these areas from immediate adverse road effects or unless needed to achieve T
The base level, restoration, aquatic and terrestrial direction work together like layers of soil - each with distinct properties and attributes while at the same time interconnected. This integrated direction is then implemented at the local level through an analysis process. The broad-scale direction is stepped-down to the ground through subbasin review and ecosystem analysis at the watershed scale which will involve identifying risks and opportunities in an interagency, cooperative fashion so that activities will be
conducted in the most appropriate areas in the most appropriate sequence to benefit landscape health,
fish and wildlife habitats, tribes and local communities.
Activities would be designed to make commodity products available for purchase, to the extent possible, to serve national demand for the products, support economic activity important to rural and tribal
communities and local government, and to achieve management objectives in an efficient and cost-
The Preferred Alternative takes into consideration all the components of the basin's ecosystem - it promotes the health of federal lands and benefits fish and wildlife habitats, tribes and communities. The Preferred Alternative improves and bolsters local coordination with tribal governments and local communities and provides a stronger commitment to identify opportunities where we can work together more effectively.
The direction in the Preferred Alternative is synchronized to guide a wide variety of desired outcome including promoting vegetation that is in short supply in the basin - from old Ponderosa Pine forests to
sagebrush plant communities that have been replaced by noxious weeds. The direction guides managers
to reduce ecological risks by reducing the road network on public lands and increasing the use of prescribed fire.
The magnitude of the forests and rangeland health issues facing the basin require intensive and extensive
investment in restoration. The Preferred Alternative provides the best strategy for tackling these significant issues because it sets priorities for investing in restoration where there is the greatest potential for achieving desired outcomes. Where restoration is conducted under the direction called for in the Preferred Alternative, there are decreases in the threats of noxious weeds, catastrophic fire and disease and insect infestation and benefits to tribes and communities.
Public meetings to provide information on the Supplemental Draft EIS are planned to be held in the following locations:
Oregon: Bend, John Day, Lakeview Idaho: Boise, Coeur D'Alene, Salmon
Washington: Okanogan, Walla Walla, Colville Montana: Missoula, Kalispell, Libby
The comment period on the Supplemental Draft EIS will last 90 days. The Project is accepting written comments on these documents and they can be sent to: SDEIS; P.O. Box 420; Boise, ID 83701-0420 or electronically at https://www.fs.fed.us/r6/icbemp/. A copy of the Supplemental Draft EIS is posted at this website.
Once the public comments are received and analyzed, a Final EIS will be prepared and a Record of Decision will be issued.