September 30, 2015 was a day of important scientific and policy milestones for citizen science—the participation of nonscientists in scientific research. The U.S. Forest Service R&D contributed to this special day by helping to produce a paper about citizen science for land managers and decision makers.
The paper—Investing in Citizen Science Can Improve Natural Resource Management and Environmental Protection—was written by a 21-person multidisciplinary team that was co-led by R&D ecologist, Duncan McKinley.
The paper is the 19th in an Ecological Society of America (ESA) series, Issues in Ecology.
“Publication of the report in a stand-alone ESA journal has the potential to increase the visibility and legitimacy of citizen science in the scientific community,” said McKinley.
Investing in Citizen Science is “specifically designed to help land managers and decision-makers at government agencies, non-profits, museums and other organizations evaluate whether to create programs for citizen science and how to design programs that would best meet their organization’s goals,” says McKinley.
Written in reader-friendly language, the article explains how citizen science can help organizations to:
Also, Investing in Citizen Science features several case studies of successful citizen science programs run by the Forest Service and covers the limitations and investments required of citizen science.
Important Policy Milestones for Citizen Science
On the same day that Investing in Citizen Science was published, citizen science was also advanced by several major policy initiatives including the following:
The September 30 events along with other recent high-profile citizen science events suggest that citizen science is currently gaining respect in the scientific and policy communities. Why is this happening now? Largely because the Internet and mobile technologies that are equipped with cameras and GPSs and other sensors now enable veritable armies of citizen scientists to contribute huge volumes of data to centralized databases that be analyzed in near real-time—which was never before possible.
Forest Service Programs
The Forest Service currently runs many citizen science programs that address varied topics. For example, such groups are currently collecting data on urban forestry, rare plants, and the ranges of wolverines.
In addition, the contributions of citizen scientists have been pivotal to various research projects conducted by R&D researchers. For example, Samuel Cushman, an R&D research ecologist and recipient of the Forest Service Deputy Chief’s Award for Distinguished Science for 2014, says that citizen science has been key to several of his most important projects—particularly the Multi-Species Baseline Initiative, which is an interagency effort to conduct surveys for multiple species at thousands of locations across tens of millions of acres in the U.S. Northern Rocky Mountains.
Cushman says that this project, which began in 2003, has been advanced by more than 100 citizen scientists who have spent more than 1400 hours deploying and collecting thousands of weather stations, collecting soil samples, and deploying remote cameras and baiting stations for carnivore detection. “Without the citizen science contribution, it would have been impossible for us to accomplish the scale of work we performed. Citizen scientists multiplied our workforce several fold and increased our ability to collect vast data sets from immense numbers of sample locations across millions of acres,” said Cushman.
The field of citizen science has long been dogged by skepticism about the reliability of data produced by non-scientists. However, McKinley points out that: 1) Data for scientific studies in ecology has traditionally been collected by undergrads, grad students and volunteers—not lead scientists. Therefore, citizen scientists are more similar to traditional data collectors than commonly believed; and 2) Citizen scientists are usually particularly motivated and tend to self-select themselves out of studies if they lose interest in them. Therefore, they tend to adhere to data collection protocols they are taught.
McKinley’s viewpoints have been borne out by studies showing that the reliability of data collected by citizen scientists that has been subjected to quality controls/assurances is comparable to that of data collected by traditional sources.