Glickman Accepts Recommendations on Improving Management of National Forests Release No. 0104.99 Andrew Kauders (202) 720-4623 andrew.kauders@usda.gov Joe Walsh (202) 205-1089 jwalsh/wo@fs.fed.us GLICKMAN ACCEPTS RECOMMENDATIONS ON IMPROVING MANAGEMENT OF NATIONAL FORESTS WASHINGTON, March 15, 1999 -- Agriculture Secretary Dan Glickman today announced the release of a series of recommendations by a panel of preeminent scientists, known as the Committee of Scientists, to improve National Forest planning. These recommendations will be strongly considered as the Forest Service, USDA's largest agency, develops its new regulation guiding forest management and planning. "Today, the Committee of Scientists has recommended a new planning framework for the management of our forests for the 21st century," said Glickman. "The report urges the federal government to continue to involve the public and science as a guide to managing our national treasures and affirmed our view that the agency's mission is clear: sustaining the health and vitality of our forests, grasslands, and wildlife for generations to come while providing Americans with goods and services like clean water, recreation, natural resources, and viable wildlife." The panel of thirteen scientists, with expertise in natural resources, social and economic science and management issues, was appointed by the Secretary in December, 1997. Over the course of 1998, the Committee held public discussions in all regions of the country with a wide variety of people involved in forestry to get their views on how to improve the forest management and planning process. The Committee's recommendations are intended to help guide USDA's revision of the regulations that govern management of over 191 million acres of public land. By law, the Forest Service is required to amend its 155 forest plans every 10-15 years. Over 150 million acres of national forest and grasslands are scheduled for plan revisions within the next 5 years. Jim Lyons, Under Secretary for Natural Resources and the Environment, noted that the Committee had found many examples of success stories of science and public collaboration, particularly in the Northwest under the President's Forest Plan. "The Committee recommends that we build on these success stories and ensure that the new planning framework is flexible and not a 'one-size- fits-all' process for solving natural resource issues," said Lyons. "We are committed to creating a regulation that will be less burdensome, easy to use, and less costly to taxpayers." "The time is ripe to revise these rules," said Mike Dombeck, Chief of the Forest Service. "We are not serving the public or the forests well by waiting longer to integrate science and public involvement in a consistent way across all our forests and grasslands." The Committee's recommendations, which are consistent with existing laws, include ways to: develop more collaborative relationships with local communities and interest groups throughout the planning process; use scientific assessments of the land to inform the public and land managers in making decisions; strengthen the connection between science and management by adapting land management practices in response to results from scientific monitoring of land conditions; sustain ecological integrity, protect biological diversity and watersheds on forests and grasslands; and integrate the budget more fully into forest plan implementation. The national forests and grasslands total approximately 191 million acres and provide many and diverse benefits to the American public. 900 million people visit and recreate on their national forests and grasslands every year to enjoy the great outdoors from skiing, hiking, camping, to rafting and more. The headwaters in our nation's forests, from where our rivers are born, provide Americans with more that 20 percent of their fresh water every year, making the protection of these lands critical to sustain water quality. Wildlife and plant species, some of which are endangered, also call the national forests and grasslands home. Many thousands of people also depend on the forests for their livelihoods in many ways, from recreation and commodity extraction, such as oil, gas, minerals, and timber, to providing their families with food.