Fire Effects Information System (FEIS)
FEIS Home Page

Morus alba


Photo by Ohio State Weed Lab Archive, Ohio State University,

Stone, Katharine R. 2009. Morus alba. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: [].



white mulberry
Russian mulberry
silkworm mulberry

The scientific name of white mulberry is Morus alba L. (Moraceae) [44,72].

In North America, white mulberry hybridizes with the native red mulberry (M. rubra) ([18,153,171,174], review by [30]). Both species are highly variable and frequently confused with each other [44].

Numerous white mulberry cultivars occur in North America ([11,32,41], review by [33]).




SPECIES: Morus alba

White mulberry is native to China [23,110,168] and was introduced to North America in the 1600s (reviews by [18,33]). In 1624 the legislature of Virginia required every male resident to plant at least 4 white mulberry trees to promote a North American silk industry. By the 1830s, the potential for a silk industry prompted a horticultural phenomenon known as "mulberry mania" in the eastern United States. In the late 1830s, white mulberry plantations in the Northeast were killed by cold winters and those in the South were killed by disease, halting the planting of white mulberry. However, white mulberry seeds were imported from Europe in the 1860s to promote a silk industry in Utah (review by [106]).

White mulberry has established outside of cultivation in many areas [11,25,56,57,96,105,110,122,148,168,173,179,180]. As of this writing (2009), white mulberry is widely distributed across North America, occurring across all of the United States with the exceptions of Nevada and Alaska. In Canada, it is found in British Columbia, Ontario, and Quebec. Plants Database provides a distribution map of white mulberry.

Plant community descriptions: Though it is found across the United States, white mulberry occurs in some plant communities more frequently than others. Many sources report it as occurring in floodplain or riparian communities, or in plant communities within the range of the native red mulberry. Descriptions in the literature suggest that white mulberry dominates plant communities infrequently, usually occurring at relatively low levels compared to other species.

Reported density and basal area of white mulberry in plant communities in the United States
Location Plant community Size class* Density** Basal area***
Northern Great Plains
Eastern Nebraska oak (Quercus spp.)-basswood (Tilia americana) forest 8-20.0 cm DBH 7 0.1 [129]
Great Lakes
Southwestern Indiana bottomland successional forest understory tree 11 0.02 [117]
Indiana old-growth oak-hickory (Carya spp.) forest <3 m in height 0-3
stems/1 m²
not reported [171]
Southwestern Michigan abandoned old field not reported 0.17
stems/200 m²
not reported [45]
Central Ohio riparian bottomland forest not reported 36 not reported [36]
North-central Ohio second-growth mixed hardwood forest tree 0.17 14.2 cm²/ha [175]

West-central Ohio

northern whitecedar (Thuja occidentalis) forest ≥10 cm DBH 30 0.5 [76]
Northern Delaware hardwood forest sapling 11.65 0.1 cm²/ha [97]
Northern New Jersey mature oak-hickory forest sapling 0.09
stems/100 m²
not reported [169]
Bronx, New York black locust (Robinia pseudoacacia) forest seedlings and saplings 125.53 0.64
≥5 cm DBH 21.28 0.54
oak-maple (Acer spp.) forest ≥5 cm DBH 11.67 0.17 [182]
New York County, New York northern red oak (Quercus rubra) ridge forest subcanopy tree 6 not reported
yellow-poplar (Liriodendron tulipifera) valley forest subcanopy tree 9 not reported [43]
North-central Virginia mixed hardwood forests not reported 33 0.65 [70]
South-Central United States
Southern Louisiana floodplain forest mature tree 2.3 0.7 [170]
Central Oklahoma post oak (Q. stellata)-blackjack oak (Q. marilandica) forest 2.5-12.7 cm DBH 3.29 not reported
>12.7 cm DBH 1.95 not reported [128]
West-central Texas riparian forest not reported 3 not reported [164]
*Description follows source
**Stems/ha unless labeled otherwise
*** m²/ha unless labeled otherwise

Reports of white mulberry as common or dominant include riparian, floodplain, or bottomland forests in Arizona [178], Illinois [26], Iowa [26,98], Missouri [26], Nebraska [130], New Mexico [72], Ohio [36], Texas [131], Virginia [3], and Washington [91,92], sand prairies in Kansas [119], upland forests on a Potomac River island [155], second-growth forests on an island in Lake Erie [121], and black locust and oak-maple plant associations in New York [182].

This section includes descriptions of plant communities where white mulberry occurs in the following geographic areas: Northern Great Plains, Great Lakes, Northeast, South-central United States, Southern Appalachians, Southeast, Southwest, California, and Pacific Northwest. Within geographic areas, descriptions are organized by plant communities where white mulberry is reported as common or dominant, uncommon or rare, or relative abundance is unknown.

Northern Great Plains: In the Northern Great Plains white mulberry occurs most frequently in riparian or floodplain forests, though it occasionally establishes on upland sites. While most forest communities with white mulberry are dominated by deciduous trees, it occasionally occurs in forests with eastern redcedar (Juniperus virginiana). It also establishes in fields and in prairie plant communities.

White mulberry and basswood were "important" species occurring in elm-hackberry (Ulmus spp. -Celtis occidentalis) plant communities along small streams in southeastern Iowa [98]. In "savanna-like" riparian forests surrounded by mixed-grass prairie uplands in south-central Nebraska, white mulberry codominated with bur oak (Q. macrocarpa), green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica), and silver maple (Acer saccharinum) [130]. In the sand prairies of south-central Kansas, white mulberry was a common, widely distributed plant along dune slopes, tops of dunes, and in low areas between dunes in the sand sagebrush-bluestem (Artemisia filifolia-Andropogon spp.) prairie plant community [119].

White mulberry was an uncommon species in transitional oak-basswood forests in the Lower Platte River Valley in eastern Nebraska [129]. White mulberry was scarce in gallery forests dominated by bur oak, hackberry, and chinkapin oak (Q. muehlenbergii) along streams in the bluestem prairie region in northern Kansas [46]. In the tallgrass prairie region of Kansas, white mulberry occurred infrequently in warm-season hay meadows, warm-season pastures, cool-season pastures, and Conservation Reserve Program fields [73]. In the shortgrass prairie region of eastern Colorado, a single white mulberry tree was recorded in riparian forests dominated by eastern cottonwood (Populus deltoides), peachleaf willow (Salix amygdaloides), and the nonnative Russian-olive (Elaeagnus angustifolia) [79].

There are several reports of white mulberry occurring at unknown densities in floodplain forests in the Northern Great Plains [52,81,82,98,107,142,152]. Characteristic species in floodplain forests include eastern cottonwood, boxelder (A. negundo), American elm (Ulmus americana), and dogwood (Cornus spp.) in southeastern South Dakota [142,152], silver maple and eastern cottonwood in southeastern Iowa [98], plains cottonwood (Populus deltoides subsp. monilifera) and peachleaf willow in Kansas [52], and bur oak, black walnut (Juglans nigra), green ash, boxelder, eastern cottonwood, Kentucky coffeetree (Gymnocladus dioica), and red mulberry in eastern Kansas [82]. River- and streamside woodlands in north-central Kansas were similar in composition to floodplain forests in eastern Kansas but also contained American elm, slippery elm (U. rubra), hackberry, and honey-locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) [107]. In southeastern Kansas, white mulberry occurred in sandy lowland woods on hillsides, where chinkapin oak, Shumard oak (Q. shumardii), bitternut hickory (Carya cordiformis), and American elm were common [82].

White mulberry occurs in unknown densities in several upland plant communities in the Northern Great Plains. It established in a sandsage prairie community in southwestern Kansas where sand sagebrush was the dominant shrub and sand dropseed (Sporobolus cryptandrus) and blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis) were the most abundant understory grasses [69]. In southeastern South Dakota, white mulberry occurred in shingle oak (Q. imbricaria)-bur oak forests [98]. In the same region, it occurred in planted farmstead woodlots with elm, green ash, boxelder, and hackberry [151]. In west-central Iowa, white mulberry seeds were present in the seed bank in eastern redcedar woodlands, deciduous shrub communities with roughleaf dogwood (Cornus drummondi) and elms, tallgrass prairie dominated by big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii) and indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), and midgrass prairie dominated by little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) and sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula) [127]. In south-central Nebraska, white mulberry occurred in a mixed-grass prairie dominated by sideoats grama, buffalo grass (Buchloe dactyloides), and little bluestem [139].

Great Lakes: In the Great Lakes region, white mulberry occurs most frequently in mixed-hardwood forests, which may be in riparian, floodplain, or upland areas. White mulberry also occurs in some coniferous forest types, old fields, and prairie plant communities.

White mulberry was common in riparian forests in Missouri, Illinois, and Iowa. Other common species included boxelder, silver maple, American sycamore (Platanus occidentalis), eastern cottonwood, pin oak (Q. palustris), black willow (S. nigra), American elm, hackberry, sugarberry (Celtis laevigata), green ash, and red mulberry [26]. In central Ohio, white mulberry was a relatively common species in riparian bottomland forests dominated by boxelder, Ohio buckeye (Aesculus glabra), eastern cottonwood, and American sycamore [36]. White mulberry was common on an island in Lake Erie in second-growth forests dominated by eastern redcedar; hackberry, maple, domestic fruit trees, and red mulberry were also common [121].

Several sources report white mulberry as uncommon or infrequent in the Great Lakes region. In southeastern Ohio, white mulberry was a rare species in floodplain forests dominated by silver maple, boxelder, American elm, American sycamore, black walnut, and Ohio buckeye [65]. White mulberry was uncommon in oak forests in southeastern Michigan [62] and northwestern Ohio [40], remnant old-growth oak-hickory forests in Indiana [171], sugar maple (Acer saccharum)-oak ravine and slope forests in central Illinois [42], streamside sugar maple forests in central Illinois [6], and second-growth American beech (Fagus grandifolia)-sugar maple forests in north-central Ohio [175].

White mulberry occurs in unknown densities in several mixed hardwood forest communities in the Great Lakes region, including disturbed pin oak and willow oak (Q. phellos) forest [114] and lowland American elm, sugar maple, and yellow-poplar forest in southern Illinois [104], oak-hickory secondary "woodlots" in western Ohio [115], and mixed deciduous forests in southern Ontario [18,37]. Two years after a clearcut, white mulberry seeds were found in soil samples from a southern Ontario woodlot that contained white ash, sugar maple, quaking aspen (Populus tremuloides), and black cherry (Prunus serotina) prior to treatment [15]. White mulberry occurred in northern whitecedar forests in west-central Ohio [76], sand prairie communities in central Illinois [99], and prairie remnants in northwestern Illinois [8].

White mulberry established on sites revegetating after human development or old field abandonment. On the Lake Erie Islands archipelago, white mulberry occurred in secondary mixed hardwood forests developing on former upland orchards, vineyards, and quarries, with highest importance values in former orchards. It was not found in nearby mature upland or lowland forest [9]. In southwestern Michigan, white mulberry occurred in 5-year-old old fields, establishing around stands of staghorn sumac (Rhus typhina) [45].

Northeast: White mulberry occurs most frequently in a variety of mixed-hardwood forest communities in the Northeast region, including floodplain, lowland, upland, and ravine forests. White mulberry also occurs in forests with some coniferous species such as eastern white pine (Pinus strobus) and eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), as well as on sand flats.

White mulberry was reported as common or frequent in a few deciduous plant communities in the Northeast. Near Bronx, New York, white mulberry occurred as a relatively common species along edges and in gaps of both black locust and oak-maple plant associations [182]. In northeastern Virginia, white mulberry was frequent in floodplain forests dominated by ashes, elms, hackberry, red maple, shingle oak, boxelder, and American sycamore [3]. On an island in the Potomac River, white mulberry was the 3rd most dominant species after American elm and boxelder in an upland deciduous forest [155].

Several sources report white mulberry as uncommon or infrequent in the Northeast. In New York County, New York, white mulberry was an uncommon subcanopy tree in a yellow-poplar valley forest and a northern red oak ridge forest [43]. In southeastern New York, white mulberry occurred at low densities in a forest established on serpentine rubble. Dominant species included northern red oak, black walnut, sugar maple, American elm, and the nonnatives tree-of-heaven (Ailanthus altissima) and Norway maple (A. platanoides) [90]. In Bronx, New York, white mulberry was absent from the aboveground vegetation but present at low density in the soil seed bank in deciduous forests dominated by oaks, hickories, maples, yellow-poplar, and sweetgum [84]. White mulberry was uncommon in oak-hickory forests in northern New Jersey [169] and eastern Maryland [144], deciduous floodplain forests along the Raritan River in New Jersey [16,47], and lowland and floodplain forests dominated by oaks, sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua), and red maple in eastern Maryland [144].

White mulberry occurred in unknown densities in mixed hardwood forests in northern Delaware [97], Pennsylvania [68], and Virginia [70,172]. In Massachusetts, white mulberry was found in forests dominated by oaks and hickories, along with variable amounts of eastern white pine and eastern hemlock [7]. White mulberry established under eastern cottonwood in early-successional plant communities on sand-flats along the Hudson River, New York [102,103]. White mulberry occurred in constructed wetlands near a Delaware River tidal marsh in New Jersey. Overstory species included American sycamore, river birch (Betula nigra), blackberry (Rubus spp.), willow, and grape (Vitis spp.) [89].

South-central United States: In the South-central United States, white mulberry occurs in floodplain, riparian, oak, oak-hickory, and canyon-bottom forests, as well as prairie and coastal ridge plant communities.

In the northeastern corner of the Texas panhandle, white mulberry was locally frequent in river-bottom woodlands dominated by cottonwood (Populus spp.) [131].

Several sources report white mulberry as uncommon or infrequent in the South-central United States. In west-central Texas, white mulberry was widespread but uncommon in riparian forests dominated by Ashe juniper (Juniperus ashei), cedar elm (U. crassifolia), American sycamore, and Texas persimmon (Diospyros texana) [164]. In central Missouri, white mulberry was an uncommon species in a floodplain oak-hickory forest [35]. In west-central Oklahoma, white mulberry was an uncommon species in deciduous canyon-bottom sugar maple forests surrounded by tallgrass prairie and blackjack oak woodlands [93]. White mulberry was present in low numbers in a 15- to 20-year-old revegetating lead and zinc mine spoil site in northeastern Oklahoma. The establishing forest was dominated by eastern cottonwood, black willow, American elm, slippery elm, and northern catalpa (Catalpa speciosa) [54]. In southwestern coastal Louisiana, white mulberry was an infrequent species in prairie, coastal ridge, and mixed-woods plant communities [39].

In Oklahoma, white mulberry occurred in open post oak-blackjack oak forest [128] and planted windbreaks surrounded by bluestem-blue grama prairie and blue grama-buffalo grass plains [94]. In southeastern Louisiana, white mulberry occurred in disturbed areas on spoil banks within the bottomland hardwood forest plant community. Typical species occurring on spoil banks included black willow, sugarberry, American black elderberry (Sambucus canadensis), Jesuit's bark (Iva frutescens), and groundsel-tree (Baccharis halimifolia) [27]. In southern Louisiana, white mulberry occurred in floodplain forests on levee ridges dominated by the nonnative tallowtree (Triadica sebifera) and native species such as live oak (Q. virginiana) and sugarberry [170].

Southern Appalachian: In the Southern Appalachian region, white mulberry occurs in bottomland, riparian, cove, and suburban hardwood forests. It was not reported as common in any plant community description. In southwestern Indiana, white mulberry was found at low levels in the understory of bottomland successional forests dominated by sweetgum and red maple [117]. In southwestern Kentucky, white mulberry was found in low, moist woods, where characteristic species included boxelder, green ash, and river birch [61]. White mulberry was an occasional species in mixed mesophytic, deciduous cove floor forests in southeastern Tennessee. Common canopy species included American beech, basswood, and black oak (Q. velutina) [24]. In northwestern Tennessee, white mulberry occurred with boxelder, silver maple, and green ash in riverbank [75] and bottomland [22] hardwood forests. In northeastern Alabama, white mulberry occurred along creeks and streams in alluvial forests with yellow-poplar, water oak, and American bladdernut (Staphylea trifolia) [10]. Near Atlanta, Georgia, white mulberry occurred in an uneven-aged suburban forest dominated by yellow-poplar, white oak, hickories, loblolly pine (P. taeda), American beech, and northern red oak [49].

Southeast: In the Southeast region, white mulberry occurs in riparian forests, shrub thickets, and other hardwood forests. On an island off the coast of North Carolina, white mulberry was the 4th most common species in a maritime shrub thicket dominated by yaupon (Ilex vomitoria) [101]. In central North Carolina, white mulberry occurred with many other nonnative species in urban riparian forests containing a mixture of American sycamore, red maple, yellow-poplar, sweetgum, oaks, and hickories [167]. White mulberry occurred in mesic hardwood forests in southeastern Alabama. Dominant canopy vegetation included southern magnolia (Magnolia grandiflora), sweetbay (Magnolia virginiana), white oak, yellow-poplar, American beech, and black tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica) [132]. White and red mulberry were identified from Public Land Survey records as occurring in upland oak-hickory forests in northern Florida [134].

Southwest: As of this writing (2009), all reports of white mulberry in the Southwest region are from riparian or floodplain forest communities. Along the Middle River Grande River, New Mexico, white mulberry was a common nonnative species in floodplain forests dominated by eastern cottonwood [72]. In central Arizona, white mulberry occurred in riparian areas along the Hassayampa River. It was frequent on severely disturbed mesquite (Prosopis sp.) terraces, where most of the mesquite was removed, and was a rare species in streamside, non-emergent herbaceous areas and along floodplain terraces dominated by mule-fat (Baccharis salicifolia) [178]. In southeastern Arizona, white mulberry was found in the soil seed bank (but not in extant vegetation) of a riparian deciduous forest dominated by Arizona sycamore (Platanus wrightii), bigtooth maple (A. grandidentatum), velvet ash (Fraxinus velutina), and gray oak (Q. grisea) [125]. White mulberry was also found on riparian sites in the Grand Canyon area of northwestern Arizona [145].

California: One report describes white mulberry occurring in a riparian forest community in California. White mulberry was an uncommon tree in Central Valley riparian forests. Common trees included boxelder, California sycamore (Platanus racemosa), Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii), valley oak (Quercus lobata), and willows (Salix spp.) [126]. No additional information was available regarding white mulberry occurrence in California as of this writing (2009).

Pacific Northwest: Two reports describe white mulberry as occurring in a riparian forest community in the Pacific Northwest region. White mulberry was a dominant species in riparian forests along the Snake River in eastern Washington. Other dominants included willow (Salix sp.), netleaf hackberry (Celtis reticulata), and golden currant (Ribes aureum) [91,92]. Adjacent plant communities included a willow flat, an open field dominated by cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum), lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), and prickly lettuce (Lactuca serriola), and a sage flat dominated by big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) and cheatgrass [92]. No additional information was available regarding white mulberry occurrence in the Pacific Northwest region as of this writing (2009).


SPECIES: Morus alba
Botanical description: This description covers characteristics that may be relevant to fire ecology and is not meant for identification. Keys for identification are available (e.g., [11,25,44,56,57,60,105,122,148,173]).

Aboveground description: White mulberry grows as a dense, round-topped, perennial shrub or tree (review by [33]), reaching heights around 50 feet (15 m) [44]. The thin bark is shallowly furrowed and has long, narrow ridges [44]. White mulberry leaves are alternate, simple, ovate, 2 to 4 inches (6-10 cm) long and 1 to 2 inches (3-6 cm) wide, with margins varying from coarsely serrate to deeply lobed and serrate. Leaves exude a milky juice when broken. Staminate and pistillate flowers develop in separate catkins [143]. Plants are typically dioecious [18,48] and occasionally monoecious [21]. White mulberry fruits are cylindrical drupes, 0.5 to 1.0 inches (1.5-2.5 cm) long. Fruits may be black, purple, or white. The ovoid nutlet has a thin, soft shell [143], and the seed has a "hard bony coat" [85].

White mulberry fruit.
Photo by Robert Vidéki, Doronicum Kft.,

Belowground description: White mulberry has a wide, spreading root system ([41,138,143], review by [30]), with both a tap root and lateral roots [138]. Roots are large in diameter close to the root crown but decrease rapidly in size, branching within a few feet of the root crown into numerous fibrous roots [17]. Roots of a 21-year-old white mulberry penetrated approximately 7 feet (2 m) deep and had a 22-foot (7 m) lateral spread in silty clay loam soil in eastern Nebraska [138]. In Oklahoma, 5 planted white mulberry trees penetrated to a depth of 13 feet (4 m) in a deep silt loam. The longest lateral root extension was 42 feet (13 m). Most lateral roots occurred in the upper 1 to 3 feet (0.3-1 m) of soil, and no lateral roots occurred below 5 feet (2 m); average lateral root spread was calculated at 190 to 330 ft² [17].

Life span: White mulberry trees may have a long life span; at Mt. Vernon, a white mulberry planted by George Washington in 1785 was alive as of 1990 (review by [106]). There are records of 150-year-old white mulberry trees in Greece (review by [86]) and a 120-year-old planted white mulberry tree in Utah (review by [106]).

Raunkiaer [124] life form:

White mulberry generally flowers from April to May [32,49,60,105,119,177], with earlier flowering in March in the Carolinas [122], and later flowering into June in the upper Midwest (review by [30]). White mulberry fruits begin forming in May [60,119,122] and may continue developing into late July [140].


White mulberry reproduces by seed. Following injury, white mulberry may regenerate vegetatively via sprouting from the stump, roots, or cut stems, though this response is not widely documented.

Pollination and breeding system: White mulberry is generally dioecious [18,48], though monoecious plants are occasionally found [21]. It is wind pollinated [181].

Seed production: White mulberry reproduces by seed (review by [30]). In northeastern Kansas, white mulberry plants produced an average of 22.52 seeds/fruit, and fruits remained on plants an average of 3.1 days [140].

Seed dispersal: White mulberry fruits are eaten and dispersed by animals, including birds ([23,71,113,121,173], review by [30]), red foxes [83], northern raccoons, Virginia opossums, squirrels [71], and other mammals (review by [30]). Box turtles may disperse white mulberry seeds [12]. Many seeds fall near the base of the parent plant [32].

Seed banking: A forestry handbook from India lists white mulberry seeds as viable for 720 days [111]. Tests at a nursery in Nebraska found that, while white mulberry seeds remained viable for at least a year when stored in cool, sealed conditions, they deteriorated rapidly upon removal from storage [154].

White mulberry seeds have been found in soil samples even when mature plants are not present in extant vegetation, though the seeds were not always viable. White mulberry was absent from aboveground vegetation but present at low density in the soil seed bank in deciduous forests in Bronx, New York, with viable seeds occurring at a soil depth of 0 to 4 inches (0-10 cm) [84]. White mulberry seeds were detected in 32% of soil samples taken from a woodlot in southern Ontario in November, occurring in samples at a density of 334.8 seeds/m². These seeds were not viable in seedling emergence trials [15]. In west-central Iowa, white mulberry seeds were present in the seed bank in coniferous woodland, deciduous shrub, tallgrass prairie, and midgrass prairie plant communities. Neither the viability of these seeds nor white mulberry's presence in the aboveground vegetation were reported [127]. In southeastern Arizona, white mulberry was found in the soil seed bank of a riparian deciduous forest but was not found in extant vegetation [125].

Germination: Greenhouse experiments show variable germination rates, with germination generally improving with cold stratification ([85], review by [33]), and variable results after ingestion by wildlife [12,85]. Wild-collected white mulberry seeds showed high germination rates (92.3%) in greenhouse trials where seeds were exposed to indirect sunlight and fluctuating temperatures from June to October. Germination rates were lower (78.3%) for seeds that had been ingested by box turtles prior to germination trials [12]. Another study found that dormancy of white mulberry seeds varies; seeds from the same cohort may exhibit seed coat dormancy, embryonic dormancy, or both. Seeds exhibiting all 3 types of dormancy showed improved germination following both cold stratification and digestion by American robins. Seeds had germination rates of 45.8% when just digested by American robins and 68.8% when digestion by American robins was combined with 90-day cold stratification. In contrast, control seeds with no treatment had a germination rate of 34.0% while those only exposed to cold stratification had a germination rate of 55.2%. Scarification of control seeds with a 15-minute sulfuric acid treatment reduced germination rates [85].

A forestry handbook from India reports that white mulberry seeds take 35 days to germinate [111], though one review reports an expected germination rate of 73% to 84% 8 to 12 days following 60-day stratification in sand [141].

Seedling establishment and plant growth: As of 2009, there was little published information regarding conditions conducive to the establishment of white mulberry. Though 1 review states that white mulberry cannot grow in shade (review by [30]), there are reports of white mulberry seedlings establishing under the cover of other vegetation [45,50,103]. In some areas, both natural [98,182] and anthropogenic [45,54,80,112,114,170,178] disturbances appear to favor the establishment of white mulberry, though not in all cases (e.g., see [70]). See Successional Status for additional information regarding white mulberry light preferences and response to disturbance.

Growth rate: A manual to woody landscaping plants reports that white mulberry has a fast growth rate, growing 10 to 12 feet (3-4 m) over a 4- to 6-year period (review by [33]).

White mulberry seedling.
Photo by Chuck Bargeron, University of Georgia,

Vegetative regeneration: There is little evidence that white mulberry commonly regenerates vegetatively, though there are accounts of sprouting from stumps [150], roots (reviews by [21,136]), and cut stems buried in the soil (review by [30]). Stumps from 6-year-old plants of a white mulberry cultivar developed 5 to 8 sprouts that grew 16 to 20 inches (40-50 cm) in 1 year [150].

General site types: White mulberry establishes in a variety of site types, including largely native plant communities, as well as many sites associated with human disturbance. It commonly establishes in the understory of floodplain [3,35,47,52,60,65,72,82,98,142,144,152,170,178] or riparian [26,36,53,73,79,91,92,94,99,126,130,145,164,167,178] plant communities. Floras report white mulberry occurring in wooded areas [60], "woods" [168], forest or woodland edges ([41,44,153]), dry to moist thickets [44], low stream banks, drained woods [147], or prairie hills [143].

White mulberry establishes in disturbed [44,179,180], ruderal [25,28], and "waste" areas ([41,96,177], review by [30]), including areas along roadsides ([53,60,96,153,156], review by [30]), railroad tracks [108,168], levees [156], and near dwellings [122], and in vacant lots [168], pastures ([122,158], review by [30]), fields [45,153,168], fencerows ([28,41,44,60], review by [30]), hedgerows [144,168], or windbreaks [122].

Climate: Given the wide geographic range of white mulberry, climate does not seem to particularly restrict its establishment. White mulberry occurs in areas with subtropical humid climates like southeastern Alabama, with long hot summers and short, mild winters [132]. It also occurs in the semiarid and continental climate of eastern Colorado, with high daily and annual temperature ranges, high potential evapotranspiration rates, and strong winds [79]. White mulberry tolerates the cold temperatures of Massachusetts, where average January temperatures are 23 °F (-5 °C) and average July temperatures are 68 °F (20 °C) [7], as well as the warm temperatures of locations like northern Alabama where average January temperatures are 45.5 °F (7.5 °C) and average July temperatures are 80.1 °F (26.7 °C) [10]. However, reports from northwestern Oklahoma indicate the tips of branches are susceptible to freezing [64], and cold winters in the Northeast killed white mulberry plantations in the 1830s (review by [106]).

White mulberry tolerates a wide range of annual precipitation, occurring in areas where reported average annual precipitation ranges from 11 inches (286 mm) in central Arizona [178] to 60 inches (1,400 mm) in northern Alabama [10].

Reported average annual precipitation for locations where white mulberry occurs in the United States
Location Average annual precipitation (mm)*
Northern Alabama 1,270-1,400 [10]
Central Arizona 286 [178]
Eastern Colorado 470 [79]**
Southwestern Indiana 1,140 [117]
South-central Kansas 760 [119]
Southeastern Kentucky 1,170 [133]
Massachusetts 1,190 [7]**
Southwestern Michigan 860 [45]
West-central Ohio 945 [76]
Northeastern Oklahoma 1,045 [54]
West-central Oklahoma 760 [93]
Southeastern Washington 330 [92]

*Values are for annual precipitation unless otherwise noted
**Annual rainfall

Elevation: In North America, white mulberry occurs from 0 to 5,000 feet (0-1,500 m) [44]. It does not appear to be restricted to particular elevations and may occur at high elevations outside North America.

Reported elevation of sites with white mulberry
Location Elevation (feet)
Central Arizona 2,000 [178]
Grand Canyon area of northern Arizona 3,100 [145]
Southwestern Indiana 434 [117]
Southeastern Kentucky 801-1,610 [133]
Massachusetts 300-1,000 [7]
Central Missouri 540 [35]
North-central Tennessee 350-380 [75]
Northern Pakistan 8,500 [116]

Soil: White mulberry occurs on a variety of soil types. One review states that white mulberry prefers rich loamy soil [141]. It establishes on silt loam in southwestern Indiana [117], central Ohio [36], and northwestern Tennessee [22], clay loam in central Missouri [35], and sandy loam in southwestern Michigan [45] and central New Jersey [47]. In northwestern Oklahoma white mulberry tolerates both sandy and loamy soil textures [64]. It is associated with sandy soil in Kansas [82,119], northeastern Oklahoma [54], coastal Louisiana [39], and southeastern New York [90].

A manual to woody landscaping plants reports that white mulberry grows best in fertile soils [33], though one review states that it tolerates poor soils [30]. White mulberry occurred on nutrient-rich soils in southeastern New York [90].

White mulberry is adapted to a range of soil pH (review by [33]). It was found on neutral soils in both northern Alabama [10] and southeastern New York, but was not found on acidic soils in southeastern New York [90]. In north-central Texas, white mulberry established in limestone areas [32].

A manual to woody landscaping plants states that white mulberry grows best in moist, well-drained soils [33], though it has established in both well-drained ([16,36,39], review by [141]) and poorly drained soils [39].

White mulberry is not restricted to any particular successional stage, occurring in early [45,54,103,112], mid-successional [9,47,89,115,117,121,175], and mature [169,171] plant communities. In some instances, white mulberry established secondarily after other woody species established and provided perches for seed-dispersing birds [45,102,103].

Light: White mulberry tolerates both open and shady conditions. A review states that it cannot grow in shade [30], and a manual to woody landscaping plants reports that it tolerates full sun to light shade [33]. In Ontario, white mulberry was generally found in more open conditions than the native red mulberry [18]. White mulberry seedlings grown in experimental field plots in Nebraska had a 53% higher growth rate when grown in sun compared to shade [100].

Though white mulberry may grow better in open conditions, it is commonly found in low-light areas such as canyon bottoms in west-central Oklahoma [93], lowland forests in southern Illinois [104], and old-growth oak-hickory forests in Indiana [171]. White mulberry seedlings established under the cover of planted pine groves in northeastern Kansas [50], eastern cottonwood in New York [103], and staghorn sumac in southwestern Michigan [45].

Disturbance: There is some evidence that disturbance is conducive to white mulberry establishment, though not in all cases.

Natural disturbance: In southeastern Iowa, white mulberry occurred in silver maple-eastern cottonwood floodplain plant communities, though only in gaps created by dead elms [98]. In contrast, in north-central Virginia, white mulberry had not established in debris avalanche areas 10 years after the disturbance, but was present in nearby reference mixed-hardwood forest [70]. Near Bronx, New York, white mulberry occurred as a relatively common species along edges and in gaps of both black locust and oak-maple plant communities [182]. In north-central Ohio, white mulberry was found in second-growth but not old-growth hardwood forests [175]. White mulberry also established in disturbed forests in Wisconsin [29] and Ontario [37], though no mechanism of disturbance was reported.

White mulberry occurs in many floodplain or riparian forests prone to flooding [6,16,26,35,36,47,61,75,109]. In central Ohio, white mulberry occurred in riparian bottomland forests experiencing groundwater flooding 1 to several times per year [36]. In central Missouri, white mulberry occurred on floodplain oak-hickory forests where inundation could last as long as 1 week [35]. In streamside forests in central Illinois, white mulberry occurred only at those elevational gradients experiencing flooding in 13% to 25% of years but was not present in areas experiencing more frequent flooding [6].

White mulberry is drought tolerant ([17,64,138], reviews by [30,33]), which may be attributed to its well-developed root system [138]. In the southern high plains of Oklahoma, 32.8% of planted white mulberry survived 7 years of drought [17].

Anthropogenic disturbance: In extreme southern Illinois, white mulberry established following salvage-logging after a tornado in a bottomland hardwood forest. It was not found in undisturbed forest or tornado-impacted areas without salvage logging [114]. In central Arizona, white mulberry was frequent on mesquite (Prosopis sp.) terraces characterized as "severely disturbed" following mesquite removal [178]. In southeastern Louisiana, white mulberry established on elevated spoil banks within the bottomland hardwood forest plant community [170]. White mulberry occurred at low levels on a 15- to 20-year-old revegetating lead and zinc mine spoil site in northeastern Oklahoma [54]. White mulberry established on 5- to 9-year-old revegetating landfill sites in South Korea [80]. White mulberry also established following old field abandonment in New Jersey [112] and southwestern Michigan [45].

Successional role: While 1 review suggests that white mulberry has the potential to exclude native vegetation [51], there is little documentation of this impact occurring. White mulberry would most likely alter successional trajectories where it develops in dense thickets, a relatively infrequent establishment pattern. However, on a dredge spoil island in South Carolina, white mulberry established in a thicket so dense that understory vegetation was suppressed [120].


SPECIES: Morus alba

Immediate fire effect on plant: As of 2009, there was no published information regarding the immediate effects of fire on white mulberry. Because of its thin bark [44], it is likely that white mulberry plants would be top-killed by fire. It is not known whether white mulberry seeds could survive fire, though seeds do have a "hard bony coat" [85] and some may occur deep enough in the soil [84] to avoid lethal temperatures from fire.

Postfire regeneration strategy [146]:
Tree with adventitious buds, a sprouting root crown and/or root suckers
Initial off-site colonizer (off site, initial community)
Secondary colonizer (on- or off-site seed sources)

Fire adaptations and plant response to fire:

Fire adaptations: As of 2009, there was little information regarding white mulberry adaptations to fire. Therefore, the information presented here, though based on reported botanical traits, is largely speculative.

The ability of white mulberry to sprout from the stump [150] or roots (reviews by [21,136]) suggests that top-killed white mulberry plants may regenerate vegetatively following fire, though this response has only been documented once, and fire details and the type of sprouting were not specified [161] (see Plant response to fire). In Oklahoma, most white mulberry lateral roots occurred in the upper 1 to 3 feet (0.3-1 m) of soil [17], a depth at which they would not likely be damaged by fire.

White mulberry seeds present in the soil seed bank may survive fire; in Bronx, New York, viable seeds occurred at a soil depth of 0 to 4 inches (0-10 cm) [84]. Fire would likely have little impact on seeds at the greater depths, and seeds closer to the soil surface may be protected by their "hard bony coat" [85], though no studies have addressed this topic as of 2009. White mulberry's presence in the soil seed bank even when it does not occur in extant vegetation [15,84,125] suggests that white mulberry could establish in a burned area via stored seed even if mature white mulberry was not present in the area prior to fire. White mulberry seeds could be carried long distances by birds ([23,71,113,121,173], review by [30]) or mammals ([71,83], review by [30]) and deposited in burned areas following fire. However, dispersal may not be immediate; white mulberry establishment did not occur in some disturbed areas until other woody species established and provided perches for seed-dispersing birds [45,102,103].

It is not clear whether the high-light conditions existing after fire would favor the establishment of white mulberry, though 1 review states that white mulberry cannot grow in shade [30]. While white mulberry establishes in areas with natural and anthropogenic disturbance [29,37,45,54,80,98,109,112,114,170,178,182] (see Successional Status), it is not clear what attributes of disturbed areas (e.g., bare mineral soil, high-light conditions, little competition) white mulberry responds to.

Plant response to fire: As of this writing (2009), there was only one published study documenting white mulberry's response to fire. Three years after a wildfire in a New Mexico cottonwood riparian forest in the Middle Rio Grande Valley, 8 white mulberry stems were identified as postfire sprouts, though the type of sprout was unspecified [161]. Another study listed white mulberry as a nonnative species capable of sprouting from roots following wildfire in the Middle Rio Grande Valley [136].

Fuels: As of 2009, no studies specifically addressed fuel characteristics of white mulberry. An ornamental white mulberry in Bakersfield, California, had a projected leaf mass per area of crown of 990 g/m² [77].

Where white mulberry occurs within the range of red mulberry and exhibits growth patterns similar to those of red mulberry, it is unlikely that local fuel characteristics would be altered. Fuel characteristics could potentially be altered in areas where white mulberry establishes in densities and/or growth patterns differing from those of native vegetation, such as where it develops in dense thickets (e.g., see [120]). It is also possible that white mulberry alters fuel characteristics in areas where post-settlement fire exclusion facilitated the establishment of woody species like white mulberry, as was documented in riparian forests in south-central Nebraska [130] and upland areas adjacent to hardwood gallery forests in the northern Great Plains [81].

Fire regimes: It is not known what type of fire regime white mulberry is best adapted to. The current North American distribution of white mulberry includes ecosystems that historically experienced both frequent and infrequent fires of various severities. The impact of white mulberry on these fire regimes is largely unknown. One study suggests that fire exclusion in hardwood gallery forests in the northern Great Plains has facilitated spread of plants like white mulberry out of riparian corridors and into adjacent upland areas with historically high fire frequencies [81].

See the Fire Regime Table for further information on fire regimes of vegetation communities in which white mulberry may occur. Find further fire regime information for the plant communities in which this species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under "Find Fire Regimes".

Preventing postfire establishment and spread: While there is little documented information regarding the postfire establishment and spread of white mulberry (2009), the potential for vegetative regeneration from stumps [150] and roots (reviews by [21,136]), and the documentation of white mulberry sprouting 3 years following wildfire in New Mexico [161], suggest that managers should monitor top-killed white mulberry plants for any signs of regeneration. White mulberry seeds may survive in the soil seed bank or be dispersed from off-site sources, though it is not clear whether postfire conditions are conducive to white mulberry seed germination and seedling establishment (see Fire adaptations).

Preventing invasive plants from establishing in weed-free burned areas is the most effective and least costly management method. This may be accomplished through early detection and eradication, careful monitoring and follow-up, and limiting dispersal of invasive plant seed into burned areas. General recommendations for preventing postfire establishment and spread of invasive plants include:

For more detailed information on these topics see the following publications: [4,14,58,162].

Use of prescribed fire as a control agent: As of this writing (2009) there were no studies documenting the use of prescribed fire to control white mulberry. Control may be limited by the potential of white mulberry to sprout from the stump [150] or roots (reviews by [21,136]). One review suggests that white mulberry roots will continue to produce sprouts even if the plant is cut back every year [21], suggesting that repeated fires or integrated treatments may be needed to control mature white mulberry.


SPECIES: Morus alba


Information on state-level noxious weed status of plants in the United States is available at Plants Database.

Palatability and/or nutritional value: Both the foliage and fruit of white mulberry are edible to livestock and wildlife. White mulberry foliage contains high levels of protein, carbohydrates, fats, fibers, vitamins and minerals (review by [20]), though a high tannin content may limit its digestibility [5]. White mulberry foliage from Pakistan contained crude protein ranging from 13.7% to 17.6% of dry mass [5]. White mulberry foliage was eaten by domestic sheep and goats in Greece (review by [86]) and was browsed by reintroduced elk in southeastern Kentucky [133]. Consumption of white mulberry foliage by silkworms is the foundation of the international silk industry ([44,168], review by [20]). Grasshoppers defoliated white mulberry foliage in Utah (review by [106]).

White mulberry fruits from India were high in Vitamin C, and dry samples contained 5.5% protein and 87.55% carbohydrates [149]. White mulberry fruits are eaten by birds ([23,71,113,121,173], review by [30]), red foxes [83], northern raccoons, Virginia opossums, squirrels [71], and other mammals (review by [30]).

Cover value: White mulberry provides general cover, as well as foraging and nesting habitat, for many bird species. White mulberry is recommended as a shelterbelt tree to improve general wildlife habitat in the Great Plains [66] and to provide vegetative cover for bobwhite quail in northwestern Oklahoma [64]. In a floodplain woodland in southeastern Washington, white mulberry provided important summer foraging habitat for both summer- and permanent-resident birds; birds were observed gleaning insects off of living white mulberry branches and leaves [92].

Shelterbelt white mulberry provided nesting habitat for Mississippi kites in northwestern Oklahoma [94]. Wood thrushes nested in white mulberry in southeastern Pennsylvania [68]. Great blue herons, white ibises, glossy ibises, great egrets, black-crowned night herons, tricolored herons, and yellow-crowned night herons nested in a dense stand of white mulberry on a dredge spoil island in South Carolina [120]. On a coastal island in North Carolina, white mulberry was preferred by nesting great egrets, and also provided nesting habitat for snowy egrets, cattle egrets, little blue herons, and Louisiana herons [101].

Silk production: White mulberry leaves provide the natural food for silkworms. Consequently, white mulberry has been widely planted throughout the world to develop the silk industry ([44,168,173], review by [106]).

Food value: White mulberry fruits are edible to humans ([32,116], reviews by [20,30]), though unripened fruit can cause stomach irritation, nervous system stimulation, and hallucinations (review by [30]). Dried white mulberry fruits may be ground up as flour and young shoots may be cooked as a vegetable [38]. White mulberry powder has been used as a preservative for wheat flour (review by [20]).

Medicinal value: White mulberry is used for a variety of medicinal purposes. The juice of white mulberry berries is used in the treatment of jaundice and hepatitis in rural areas in Pakistan [1]. It is valued for its antimicrobial properties, antioxidant potential, and in the prevention or treatment of diseases such as diabetes, atherosclerosis, immunonutrition, cancer, neurodegenerative disorders including Alzheimer's disease, and skin disorders (review by [20]). Native Americans used infusions made from white mulberry bark as a laxative, a treatment for dysentery, and a purgative [44].

Other value: White mulberry is widely planted as an ornamental shade tree [44,60] or is used in shelterbelts [60,122,143,168]. It has been evaluated for its potential to phytoremediate seleniferous soils in India [31]. White mulberry exhibited low survival and growth after planting on acidic surface-mine soils in Kentucky [118,157]. The leaves of white mulberry are used to make a yellow dye in Turkey [34].

The milky sap of white mulberry is toxic to humans and irritates the skin (review by [30]).

Native vegetation: There is widespread concern over white mulberry's hybridization with the native red mulberry ([18,153,171,174], review by [30]). In Ontario, resulting hybrids were more similar to white mulberry parents, suggesting the potential for a local extinction of red mulberry [18]. In 1963, white mulberry was more common than red mulberry in southeastern Kansas [55]. There is also some concern in the mid-Atlantic region that white mulberry may transmit a harmful root disease to red mulberry [153].

Though it generally grows at relatively low densities, white mulberry has the potential to exclude native vegetation (review by [51]), particularly where it grows in dense thickets. However, as of this writing (2009) there was little published information documenting this impact. On a dredge spoil island in South Carolina, 95% of a 22.5 acre (9.1 ha) area was covered by a closed-canopy, even-aged stand of white mulberry. No understory was present [120]. White mulberry also established in thickets in limestone areas in north-central Texas [32], though no impact on native vegetation was reported.

White mulberry infestation.
Photo by Ohio State Weed Lab Archive, The Ohio State University,

White mulberry may have allelopathic properties; in laboratory experiments, white mulberry leaf leachate inhibited the germination of India mustard (Brassica juncea) [2].

Other impacts: Spreading white mulberry roots damaged pavement and curbs in San Francisco (review by [33]).

Control: In all cases where invasive species are targeted for control, no matter what method is employed, the potential for other invasive species to fill their void must be considered [14]. Control of biotic invasions is most effective when it employs a long-term, ecosystem-wide strategy rather than a tactical approach focused on battling individual invaders [95].

As of this writing (2009), very little information was available regarding control of white mulberry. The potential of white mulberry to sprout from the stump [150], roots (reviews by [21,136]), or from cut stems buried in the soil (review by [30]) may complicate control efforts. Information presented in the following sections may not be comprehensive and is not intended to be prescriptive in nature. It is intended to help managers understand the ecology and control of white mulberry in the context of fire management. For more detailed information on control of white mulberry, consult the references cited here or local extension services.

Fire: For information on the use of prescribed fire to control this species, see Fire Management Considerations.

Prevention: Because white mulberry is often planted as an ornamental, one way to prevent future white mulberry establishment is to avoid planting it. In the mid-Atlantic region, native alternatives to white mulberry include red maple, hackberry, black tupelo, or sassafras [153].

It is commonly argued that the most cost-efficient and effective method of managing invasive species is to prevent their establishment and spread by maintaining "healthy" natural communities [95,135] (e.g., avoid road building in wildlands [160]) and by monitoring several times each year [74]. Managing to maintain the integrity of the native plant community and mitigate the factors enhancing ecosystem invasibility is likely to be more effective than managing solely to control the invader [67].

Weed prevention and control can be incorporated into many types of management plans, including those for logging and site preparation, grazing allotments, recreation management, research projects, road building and maintenance, and fire management [162]. See the Guide to noxious weed prevention practices [162] for specific guidelines in preventing the spread of weed seeds and propagules under different management conditions.

Cultural control: No information is available on this topic (2009).

Physical or mechanical control: White mulberry seedlings may be controlled by pulling. For larger white mulberry plants, stems may be cut and the stump ground [153]. Girdling is also an option for larger trees ([153], review by [30]). Mechanical control may be limited by the potential of white mulberry to sprout from the stump [150], roots (reviews by [21,136]), or from cut stems buried in the soil (review by [30]). One review suggests that roots will continue to produce sprouts even if the plant is cut back every year [21].

Biological control: Biological control of invasive species has a long history that indicates many factors must be considered before using biological controls. Refer to these sources: [165,176] and the Weed control methods handbook [159] for background information and important considerations for developing and implementing biological control programs.

As of this writing (2009) there were no biological control programs identified for the control of white mulberry. White mulberry is susceptible to several diseases in North America (review by [137]). In the southern United States, white mulberry may be susceptible to popcorn disease caused by the fungus Ciboria carunculoides [59].

Goat browsing was used to suppress white mulberry in prairie remnants in northwest Illinois [8].

Chemical control: Herbicides are effective in gaining initial control of a new invasion or a severe infestation, but they are rarely a complete or long-term solution to weed management [19]. See the Weed control methods handbook [159] for considerations on the use of herbicides in natural areas and detailed information on specific chemicals.

No detailed information was found describing the use of herbicides to control white mulberry (as of 2009), though 1 review states that herbicides may effectively control white mulberry [30]. One handbook on invasive species in the mid-Atlantic region suggests controlling white mulberry by cutting stems and painting the stump with glyphosate [153].

Integrated management: No information is available on this topic (2009).


SPECIES: Morus alba
The following table provides fire regime information that may be relevant to white mulberry habitats. Find further fire regime information for the plant communities in which this species may occur by entering the species name in the FEIS home page under "Find Fire Regimes".

Fire regime information on vegetation communities in which white mulberry may occur. This information is taken from the LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment Vegetation Models [88], which were developed by local experts using available literature, local data, and/or expert opinion. This table summarizes fire regime characteristics for each plant community listed. The PDF file linked from each plant community name describes the model and synthesizes the knowledge available on vegetation composition, structure, and dynamics in that community. Cells are blank where information is not available in the Rapid Assessment Vegetation Model.
Pacific Northwest
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics
Percent of fires Mean interval
Minimum interval
Maximum interval
Northwest Shrubland

Mountain big sagebrush (cool sagebrush)

Replacement 100% 20 10 40
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics
Percent of fires Mean interval
Minimum interval
Maximum interval
Southwest Woodland

Mesquite bosques

Replacement 32% 135    
Mixed 67% 65    
Southwest Forested

Riparian forest with conifers

Replacement 100% 435 300 550
Northern Great Plains
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics
Percent of fires Mean interval
Minimum interval
Maximum interval
Northern Plains Grassland

Southern mixed-grass prairie

Replacement 100% 9 1 10

Central tallgrass prairie

Replacement 75% 5 3 5
Mixed 11% 34 1 100
Surface or low 13% 28 1 50
Northern Plains Woodland

Oak woodland

Replacement 2% 450    
Surface or low 98% 7.5    

Great Plains floodplain

Replacement 100% 500    
Great Lakes
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics
Percent of fires Mean interval
Minimum interval
Maximum interval
Great Lakes Grassland

Mosaic of bluestem prairie and oak-hickory

Replacement 79% 5 1 8
Mixed 2% 260    
Surface or low 20% 2   33
Great Lakes Woodland

Northern oak savanna

Replacement 4% 110 50 500
Mixed 9% 50 15 150
Surface or low 87% 5 1 20
Great Lakes Forested

Northern hardwood maple-beech-eastern hemlock

Replacement 60% >1,000    
Mixed 40% >1,000    

Great Lakes floodplain forest

Mixed 7% 833    
Surface or low 93% 61    

Maple-basswood mesic hardwood forest (Great Lakes)

Replacement 100% >1,000 >1,000 >1,000


Replacement 13% 66 1  
Mixed 11% 77 5  
Surface or low 76% 11 2 25


Replacement 19% 357    
Surface or low 81% 85    
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics
Percent of fires Mean interval
Minimum interval
Maximum interval
Northeast Woodland

Oak-pine (eastern dry-xeric)

Replacement 4% 185    
Mixed 7% 110    
Surface or low 90% 8    
Northeast Forested

Northern hardwoods-eastern hemlock

Replacement 50% >1,000    
Surface or low 50% >1,000    

Appalachian oak forest (dry-mesic)

Replacement 2% 625 500 >1,000
Mixed 6% 250 200 500
Surface or low 92% 15 7 26
South-central US
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics
Percent of fires Mean interval
Minimum interval
Maximum interval
South-central US Grassland

Southern tallgrass prairie

Replacement 91% 5    
Mixed 9% 50    
South-central US Shrubland

Shinnery oak-mixed grass

Replacement 96% 7    
Mixed 4% 150    
South-central US Woodland

Oak woodland-shrubland-grassland mosaic

Replacement 11% 50    
Mixed 56% 10    
Surface or low 33% 17    

Interior Highlands oak-hickory-pine

Gibson, David J. 1982. [75203]

Replacement 3% 150 100 300
Surface or low 97% 4 2 10
South-central US Forested

Gulf Coastal Plain pine flatwoods

Replacement 2% 190    
Mixed 3% 170    
Surface or low 95% 5    

West Gulf Coastal plain pine (uplands and flatwoods)

Replacement 4% 100 50 200
Mixed 4% 100 50  
Surface or low 93% 4 4 10

West Gulf Coastal Plain pine-hardwood woodland or forest

Replacement 3% 100 20 200
Mixed 3% 100 25  
Surface or low 94% 3 3 5

Southern floodplain

Replacement 42% 140    
Surface or low 58% 100    

Cross Timbers

Replacement 3% 170    
Mixed 2% 250    
Surface or low 94% 6    
Southern Appalachians
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics
Percent of fires Mean interval
Minimum interval
Maximum interval
Southern Appalachians Forested

Bottomland hardwood forest

Replacement 25% 435 200 >1,000
Mixed 24% 455 150 500
Surface or low 51% 210 50 250

Mixed mesophytic hardwood

Replacement 11% 665    
Mixed 10% 715    
Surface or low 79% 90    

Appalachian oak-hickory-pine

Replacement 3% 180 30 500
Mixed 8% 65 15 150
Surface or low 89% 6 3 10
Vegetation Community (Potential Natural Vegetation Group) Fire severity* Fire regime characteristics
Percent of fires Mean interval
Minimum interval
Maximum interval
Southeast Forested

Maritime forest

Replacement 18% 40   500
Mixed 2% 310 100 500
Surface or low 80% 9 3 50

Loess bluff and plain forest

Replacement 7% 476    
Mixed 9% 385    
Surface or low 85% 39    

Southern floodplain

Replacement 7% 900    
Surface or low 93% 63    
*Fire Severities
Replacement: Any fire that causes greater than 75% top removal of a vegetation-fuel type, resulting in general replacement of existing vegetation; may or may not cause a lethal effect on the plants.
Mixed: Any fire burning more than 5% of an area that does not qualify as a replacement, surface, or low-severity fire; includes mosaic and other fires that are intermediate in effects.
Surface or low: Any fire that causes less than 25% upper layer replacement and/or removal in a vegetation-fuel class but burns 5% or more of the area [63,87].

Morus alba: REFERENCES

1. Abbasi, Arshad Mehmood; Khan, Mir Ajab; Ahmad, Mushtaq; Zafar, Muhammad; Khan, Hamayun; Muhammad, Naiz; Sultana, Shazia. 2009. Medicinal plants used for the treatment of jaundice and hepatitis based on socio-economic documentation. African Journal of Biotechnology. 8(8): 1643-1650. [75293]
2. Abdulla, M. K.; Kumar, Sudhir; Ali, Hashim; Sindhu, Aditi; Sindhu, Gunjan. 2005. Allelopathic interactions of tree spp. with mustard crop. Allelopathy Journal. 16(2): 335-340. [75294]
3. Allard, H. A.; Leonard, E. C. 1962. List of vascular plants of the northern Triassic area of Virginia. Castanea. 27(1): 1-56. [73996]
4. Asher, Jerry; Dewey, Steven; Olivarez, Jim; Johnson, Curt. 1998. Minimizing weed spread following wildland fires. Proceedings, Western Society of Weed Science. 51: 49. Abstract. [40409]
5. Azim, A.; Khan, A. G.; Ahmad, J.; Ayaz, M.; Mirza, I. H. 2002. Nutritional evaluation of fodder tree leaves with goats. Asian-Australian Journal of Animal Science. 15(1): 34-37. [46153]
6. Bell, David T. 1974. Tree stratum composition and distribution in the streamside forest. The American Midland Naturalist. 92(1): 35-46. [10410]
7. Bertin, Robert I.; Manner, Megan E.; Larrow, Brian F.; Cantwell, Timothy W.; Berstene, Elizabeth M. 2005. Norway maple (Acer platanoides) and other non-native trees in urban woodlands of central Massachusetts. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 132(2): 225-235. [75235]
8. Blackmore, Mary. 1999. Dairy goats as tools for controlling woody vegetation on prairie remnants. In: Springer, J. T., ed. The central Nebraska loess hills prairie: Proceedings of the 16th North American prairie conference; 1998 July 26-29; Kearney, NE. No. 16. Kearney, NE: University of Nebraska: 243-249. [46837]
9. Boerner, Ralph E. J. 1985. Alternate pathways of succession on the Lake Erie Islands. Vegetatio. 63(1): 35-44. [75184]
10. Bostick, P. E. 1967. A geobotanical investigation of Chandler Mountain, St. Clair Co., Alabama. Castanea. 32(3): 133-154. [75164]
11. Braun, E. Lucy. 1989. The woody plants of Ohio. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press. 362 p. [12914]
12. Braun, Joanne; Brooks, Barnett R., Jr. 1987. Box turtles (Terrapene carolina) as potential agents for seed dispersal. The American Midland Naturalist. 117(2): 312-318. [61842]
13. Brooks, Matthew L. 2008. Effects of fire suppression and postfire management activities on plant invasions. In: Zouhar, Kristin; Smith, Jane Kapler; Sutherland, Steve; Brooks, Matthew L., eds. Wildland fire in ecosystems: Fire and nonnative invasive plants. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-42-vol. 6. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 269-280. [70909]
14. Brooks, Matthew L.; Pyke, David A. 2001. Invasive plants and fire in the deserts of North America. In: Galley, Krista E. M.; Wilson, Tyrone P., eds. Proceedings of the invasive species workshop: The role of fire in the control and spread of invasive species; Fire conference 2000: 1st national congress on fire ecology, prevention, and management; 2000 November 27 - December 1; San Diego, CA. Misc. Publ. No. 11. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 1-14. [40491]
15. Brown, Doug. 1992. Estimating the composition of a forest seed bank: a comparison of the seed extraction and seedling emergence methods. Canadian Journal of Botany. 70(8): 1603-1612. [69376]
16. Buell, Murray F.; Wistendahl, Warren A. 1955. Flood plain forests of the Raritan River. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 82(6): 463-472. [75201]
17. Bunger, Myron T.; Thomson, Hugh J. 1938. Root development as a factor in the success or failure of windbreak trees in the southern high plains. Journal of Forestry. 36: 790-803. [22084]
18. Burgess, Kevin S.; Husband, Brian C. 2006. Habitat differentiation and the ecological costs of hybridization: the effects of introduced mulberry (Morus alba) on a native congener (M. rubra). Journal of Ecology. 94(6): 1061-1069. [75296]
19. Bussan, Alvin J.; Dyer, William E. 1999. Herbicides and rangeland. In: Sheley, Roger L.; Petroff, Janet K., eds. Biology and management of noxious rangeland weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press: 116-132. [35716]
20. Butt, Masood Sadig; Nazir, Akmal; Sultan, M. Tauseef; Schroen, Karin. 2008. Morus alba L.: nature's functional tonic. Trends in Food and Science Technology. 19(10): 505-512. [75298]
21. Cardina, John; Herms, Cathy; Koch, Tim; Webster, Ted. 2003. Ohio perennial and biennial weed guide, [Online]. In: OSU weed managment--Weed identification resources. In: Agronomic Crops Network. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University Extension, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center (Producer). Available: [2009, November 3]. [76487]
22. Carpenter, Jackie S.; Chester, Edward W. 1987. Vascular flora of the Bear Creek Natural Area, Stewart County, Tennessee. Castanea. 52(2): 112-128. [75372]
23. Carter, Jack L. 1997. Trees and shrubs of New Mexico. Boulder, CO: Johnson Books. 534 p. [72647]
24. Clements, Richard K.; Wofford, B. Eugene. 1991. The vascular flora of Wolf Cove, Franklin County, Tennessee. Castanea. 56(4): 268-286. [75371]
25. Clewell, Andre F. 1985. Guide to the vascular plants of the Florida Panhandle. Tallahassee, FL: Florida State University Press. 605 p. [13124]
26. Colbert, Kenneth C.; Larsen, David R.; Lootens, James R. 2002. Height-diameter equations for thirteen Midwestern bottomland hardwood species. Northern Journal of Applied Forestry. 19(4): 171-176. [49448]
27. Conner, William H.; Sasser, Charles E.; Barker, Nancy. 1986. Floristics of the Barataria Basin wetlands, Louisiana. Castanea. 51(2): 111-128. [75360]
28. Cranfill, Raymond. 1991. Flora of Hardin County, Kentucky. Castanea. 56(4): 228-267. [73952]
29. Curtis, John T. 1959. Weed communities. In: Curtis, John T. The vegetation of Wisconsin. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press: 412-434. [60533]
30. Czarapata, Elizabeth J. 2005. Invasive plants of the Upper Midwest: An illustrated guide to their identification and control. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press. 215 p. [71442]
31. Dhillon, K. S.; Dhillon, S. K.; Thind, H. S. 2008. Evaluation of different agroforestry tree species for their suitability in the phytoremediation of seleniferous soils. Soil Use and Managment. 24(2): 208-216. [75299]
32. Diggs, George M., Jr.; Lipscomb, Barney L.; O'Kennon, Robert J. 1999. Illustrated flora of north-central Texas. Sida Botanical Miscellany, No. 16. Fort Worth, TX: Botanical Research Institute of Texas. 1626 p. [35698]
33. Dirr, Michael A. 1998. Manual of woody landscape plants: Their identification, ornamental characteristics, culture, propagation and uses. 5th ed. Champaign, IL: Stipes Publishing. 1187 p. [74836]
34. Dogan, Yunus; Baslar, Suleyman; Mert, Hasan Huseyin; Ay, Gungor. 2003. Plants used as natural dye sources in Turkey. Economic Botany. 57(4): 442-453. [75269]
35. Dowdy, W. W. 1950. A community study of an oak-hickory association with special reference to invertebrates. The American Midland Naturalist. 43(3): 667-695. [75286]
36. Dudek, Doreen M.; McClenahen, James R.; Mitsch, William J. 1998. Tree growth responses of Populus deltoides and Juglans nigra to streamflow and climate in a bottomland hardwood forest in central Ohio. The American Midland Naturalist. 140(2): 233-244. [41773]
37. Duguay, Stephanie; Eigenbrod, Felix; Fahrig, Lenore. 2007. Effects of surrounding urbanization on non-native flora in small forest patches. Landscape Ecology. 22: 589-599. [71249]
38. Duke, James A. 1992. Handbook of edible weeds. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 246 p. [52780]
39. Dutton, Bryan E.; Thomas, R. Dale. 1991. The vascular flora of Cameron Parish, Louisiana. Castanea. 56(1): 1-37. [73744]
40. Easterly, Nathan William. 1979. Non-indigenous plant species in the oak openings of northwestern Ohio. Castanea. 44(3): 142-149. [71404]
41. Farrar, John Laird. 1995. Trees of the northern United States and Canada. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing. 502 p. [60614]
42. Feist, Mary Ann; Phillippe, Loy R.; Busemeyer, Daniel T.; Ebinger, John E. 2004. Vegetation survey of Dean Hills Nature Preserve, Fayette County, Illinois. Castanea. 69(1): 52-66. [75145]
43. Fitzgerald, Judith M.; Loeb, Robert E. 2008. Historical ecology of Inwood Hill Park, Manhattan, New York. The Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 135(2): 281-293. [72480]
44. Flora of North America Association. 2009. Flora of North America: The flora, [Online]. Flora of North America Association (Producer). Available: [36990]
45. Foster, Bryan L.; Gross, Katherine L. 1999. Temporal and spatial patterns of woody plant establishment in Michigan old fields. The American Midland Naturalist. 142(2): 229-243. [36648]
46. Freeman, Craig C.; Hulbert, Lloyd C. 1985. An annotated list of the vascular flora of Konza Prairie Research Natural Area, Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 88(3/4): 84-115. [75342]
47. Frye, Richard J., II; Quinn, James A. 1979. Forest development in relation to topography and soils on a floodplain of the Raritan River, New Jersey. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 106(4): 334-345. [72924]
48. Fryxell, Paul A. 1957. Mode of reproduction of higher plants. Botanical Review. 23: 135-233. [67749]
49. Funderbuck, David O.; Skeen, James N. 1976. Spring phenology in a mature Peidmont forest. Castanea. 41(1): 20-30. [71755]
50. Gates, Frank C. 1926. Pines in the prairie. Ecology. 7(1): 96-98. [75165]
51. Georgia Exotic Pest Plant Council. 2006. List of non-native invasive plants in Georgia, [Online]. Southeast Exotic Pest Plant Council (Producer). Available: [2009, January 5]. [72787]
52. Gesink, R. William; Tomanek, G. W.; Hulett, G. K. 1970. A descriptive survey of woody phreatophytes along the Arkansas River in Kansas. Transactions, Kansas Academy of Science. 73(1): 55-69. [44462]
53. Ghersa, Claudio M.; de la Fuente, Elba; Suarez, Susana; Leon, Rolando J. C. 2002. Woody species invasion in the Rolling Pampa grasslands, Argentina. Agricultural Systems and Environment. 88(3): 271-278. [75300]
54. Gibson, David J. 1982. The natural revegetation of lead/zinc mine spoil in northeastern Oklahoma. The Southwestern Naturalist. 27(4): 425-436. [75203]
55. Gibson, Earl S. 1963. Vascular flora of Crawford County, Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 66(4): 685-726. [75346]
56. Gleason, Henry A.; Cronquist, Arthur. 1991. Manual of vascular plants of northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. 2nd ed. New York: New York Botanical Garden. 910 p. [20329]
57. Godfrey, Robert K. 1988. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of northern Florida and adjacent Georgia and Alabama. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press. 734 p. [10239]
58. Goodwin, Kim; Sheley, Roger; Clark, Janet. 2002. Integrated noxious weed management after wildfires. EB-160. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University, Extension Service. 46 p. Available online: [2003, October 1]. [45303]
59. Gray, Elmer; Gray, Richard E. 1987. Observations on popcorn disease of mulberry in south central Kentucky. Castanea. 52(1): 47-51. [75134]
60. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
61. Grubbs, Jeffrey T.; Fuller, Marian J. 1991. Vascular flora of Hickman County, Kentucky. Castanea. 56(3): 193-214. [75356]
62. Hammitt, William E.; Barnes, Burton V. 1989. Composition and structure of an old-growth oak-hickory forest in southern Michigan over 20 years. In: Rink, George; Budelsky, Carl A., eds. Proceedings, 7th central hardwood conference; 1989 March 5-8; Carbondale, IL. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-132. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station: 247-253. [9386]
63. Hann, Wendel; Havlina, Doug; Shlisky, Ayn; [and others]. 2008. Interagency fire regime condition class guidebook. Version 1.3, [Online]. In: Interagency fire regime condition class website. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior; The Nature Conservancy; Systems for Environmental Management (Producer). 119 p. Available: [2008, September 03]. [70966]
64. Hanson, William R. 1957. Plants for improving bobwhite habitat in northwestern Oklahoma. Arts and Sciences Studies: Biological Series Publication No. 7. Stillwater, OK: Oklahoma State University. 88 p. [62426]
65. Hardin, E. D.; Lewis, K. P.; Wistendahl, W. A. 1989. Gradient analysis of floodplain forests along three rivers in unglaciated Ohio. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 116(3): 258-264. [75180]
66. Hays, James F., Jr. 1990. Wildlife considerations in windbreak renovation. In: Great Plains Agricultural Council, compiler. Windbreaks: Living with the wind: Proceedings, windbreak renovation workshop; 1990 October 23-25; Hutchinson, KS. Great Plains Agriculture Council Publ. No. 133. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Cooperative Extension Service: 35-41. [15254]
67. Hobbs, Richard J.; Humphries, Stella E. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conservation Biology. 9(4): 761-770. [44463]
68. Hoover, Jeffrey P.; Brittingham, Margaret C. 1998. Nest-site selection and nesting success of wood thrushes. The Wilson Bulletin. 110(3): 375-383. [75277]
69. Hulett, Gary K.; Tomelleri, Joseph R.; Hampton, Colleen Orth. 1988. Vegetation and flora of a sandsage prairie site in Finney County, southwestern Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 91(3/4): 83-95. [75341]
70. Hull, James C.; Scott, Ralph C. 1982. Plant succession on debris avalanches of Nelson County, Virginia. Castanea. 47(2): 158-176. [41715]
71. Hunter, Carl G. 1989. Trees, shrubs, and vines of Arkansas. Little Rock, AR: The Ozark Society Foundation. 207 p. [21266]
72. Jemison, Roy. 2004. Relationships between hydrology, exotic plants, and fuel loads in the Middle Rio Grande. In: Hydrology and water resources in Arizona and the Southwest: Proceedings of the 2003 meetings of the Hydrology Section--Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science; 2003 April 12; Flagstaff, AZ. Volume 33. Glendale, AZ: Arizona Nevada Academy of Science: 85-92. [52856]
73. Jog, Suneeti; Kindscher, Kelly; Questad, Erin; Foster, Bryan; Loring, Hillarsi. 2006. Floristic quality as an indicator of native species diversity in managed grasslands. Natural Areas Journal. 26(2): 149-167. [63292]
74. Johnson, Douglas E. 1999. Surveying, mapping, and monitoring noxious weeds on rangelands. In: Sheley, Roger L.; Petroff, Janet K., eds. Biology and management of noxious rangeland weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press: 19-36. [35707]
75. Joyner, James J.; Chester, Edward W. 1994. The vascular flora of Cross Creeks National Wildlife Refuge, Stewart County, Tennessee. Castanea. 59(2): 117-145. [75373]
76. Kangas, Patrick. 1989. Comparison of two northern white cedar (Thuja) forests. Michigan Botanist. 28(2): 59-66. [13624]
77. Karlik, John F.; Winer, Arthur M. 1999. Comparison of calculated and measured leaf masses of urban trees. Ecological Applications. 9(4): 1168-1176. [75275]
78. Kartesz, John T. 1999. A synonymized checklist and atlas with biological attributes for the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. 1st ed. In: Kartesz, John T.; Meacham, Christopher A. Synthesis of the North American flora (Windows Version 1.0), [CD-ROM]. Chapel Hill, NC: North Carolina Botanical Garden (Producer). In cooperation with: The Nature Conservancy; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service; U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. [36715]
79. Katz, Gabrielle L.; Friedman, Jonathan M.; Beatty, Susan W. 2005. Delayed effects of flood control on a flood-dependent riparian forest. Ecological Applications. 15(3): 1019-1035. [75284]
80. Kim, Kee Dae; Lee, Eun Ju. 2005. Potential tree species for use in the restoration of unsanitary landfills. Environmental Management. 36(1): 1-14. [71966]
81. Kindscher, Kelly; Holah, Jenny. 1998. An old-growth definition for western hardwood gallery forests. Gen. Tech. Rep. SRS-22. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Research Station. 12 p. [50216]
82. Koch, Rudy G. 1970. The vascular flora of Cowley County, Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 73(2): 135-168. [75344]
83. Korschgen, Leroy J. 1959. Food habits of the red fox in Missouri. Journal of Wildlife Management. 23(2): 168-176. [25371]
84. Kostel-Hughes, Faith; Young, Truman P.; McDonnell, Mark J. 1998. The soil seed bank and its relationship to the aboveground vegetation in deciduous forests in New York City. Urban Ecosystems. 2: 43-59. [51882]
85. Krefting, Laurits W.; Roe, Eugene I. 1949. The role of some birds and mammals in seed germination. Ecological Monographs. 19(3): 269-286. [8847]
86. Krochmal, A. 1954. The vanishing white mulberry of northern Greece. Economic Botany. 8(2): 145-151. [75136]
87. LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment. 2005. Reference condition modeling manual (Version 2.1), [Online]. In: LANDFIRE. Cooperative Agreement 04-CA-11132543-189. Boulder, CO: The Nature Conservancy; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; U.S. Department of the Interior (Producers). 72 p. Available: [2007, May 24]. [66741]
88. LANDFIRE Rapid Assessment. 2007. Rapid assessment reference condition models, [Online]. In: LANDFIRE. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Lab; U.S. Geological Survey; The Nature Conservancy (Producers). Available: [2008, April 18] [66533]
89. Leck, Mary Allessio; Leck, Charles F. 2005. Vascular plants of a Delaware River tidal freshwater wetland and adjacent terrestrial areas: seed bank and vegetation comparisons of reference and constructed marshes and annotated species list. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 132(2): 323-354. [60627]
90. Levine, Maureen E.; Greller, Andrew M. 2004. Ecological and floristic analyses of vascular plants along a gradient on disturbed serpentinite on opposing slopes in Staten Island, NY. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society. 131(1): 69-92. [75231]
91. Lewke, Robert E. 1974. Sight record of Bewick's wren in eastern Washington. The Murrelet. 55(3): 42-43. [75289]
92. Lewke, Robert E. 1982. A comparison of foraging behavior among permanent, summer, and winter resident bird groups. The Condor. 84(1): 84-90. [75268]
93. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1939. The vegetation of the Caddo County Canyons, Oklahoma. Ecology. 20(1): 1-10. [64556]
94. Love, Diane; Grzybowski, Joseph A.; Knopf, Fritz L. 1985. Influence of various land uses on windbreak selection by nesting Mississippi kites. The Wilson Bulletin. 97(4): 561-565. [75193]
95. Mack, Richard N.; Simberloff, Daniel; Lonsdale, W. Mark; Evans, Harry; Clout, Michael; Bazzaz, Fakhri A. 2000. Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecological Applications. 10(3): 689-710. [48324]
96. Magee, Dennis W.; Ahles, Harry E. 2007. Flora of the Northeast: A manual of the vascular flora of New England and adjacent New York. 2nd ed. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press. 1214 p. [74293]
97. Matlack, G. R. 1989. Secondary dispersal of seed across snow in Betula lenta, a gap-colonizing tree species. Journal of Ecology. 77: 853-869. [9762]
98. McBride, Joe. 1973. Natural replacement of disease-killed elms. The American Midland Naturalist. 90(2): 300-306. [8868]
99. McClain, William E.; Phillippe, Loy R.; Ebinger, John E. 2005. Floristic assessment of the Henry Allan Gleason Nature Preserve, Mason County, Illinois. Castanea. 70(2): 146-154. [75338]
100. McClendon, John H.; McMillen, G. Gilbert. 1982. The control of leaf morphology and the tolerance of shade by woody plants. Botanical Gazette. 143(1): 79-83. [49523]
101. McCrimmon, Donald A., Jr. 1978. Nest site characteristics among five species of herons on the North Carolina coast. The Auk. 95(2): 267-280. [75279]
102. McVaugh, Rogers. 1947. Establishment of vegetation on sand-flats along the Hudson River, New York. Ecology. 28(2): 189-193. [67550]
103. McVaugh, Rogers. 1957. Establishment of vegetation on sand-flats along the Hudson River, New York.--II. The period 1945-1955. Ecology. 38(1): 23-29. [72539]
104. Mohlenbrock, Robert H. 1966. A floristics study of Ferne Clyffe State Park, Illinois. Castanea. 31(3): 198-235. [75335]
105. Mohlenbrock, Robert H. 1986. [Revised edition]. Guide to the vascular flora of Illinois. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 507 p. [17383]
106. Monson, Clark S. 1996. Mulberry trees: the basis and remnant of the Utah silk industry. Economic Botany. 50(1): 130-138. [75131]
107. Morley, Gordon E. 1964. A floristic study of Republic County, Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 67(4): 716-746. [75345]
108. Muhlenbach, Victor. 1979. Contributions to the synanthropic (adventive) flora of the railroads in St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden. 66(1): 1-108. [71736]
109. Mulhouse, John M.; Galatowitsch, Susan M. 2003. Revegetation of prairie pothole wetlands in the mid-continental United States: twelve years post-reflooding. Plant Ecology. 169(2): 143-159. [52957]
110. Munz, Philip A. 1974. A flora of southern California. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 1086 p. [4924]
111. Murali, K. S. 1997. Patterns of seed size, germination and seed viability of tropical tree species in southern India. Biotropica. 29(3): 271-279. [75271]
112. Myster, Randall W. 1993. Tree invasion and establishment in old fields at Hutcheson Memorial Forest. Botanical Review. 59(4): 251-272. [75282]
113. Neff, Johnson A. 1947. Habits, food, and economic status of the band-tailed pigeon. North American Fauna 58. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 76 p. [64170]
114. Nelson, John L.; Groninger, John W.; Battaglia, Loretta L.; Ruffner, Charles M. 2008. Bottomland hardwood forest recovery following tornado disturbance and salvage logging. Forest Ecology and Management. 256(3): 388-395. [71133]
115. Nixon, Charles M.; Donohoe, Robert W.; Nash, Tom. 1974. Overharvest of fox squirrels from two woodlots in western Ohio. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 38(1): 67-80. [75280]
116. Nusser, Marcus. 2000. Change and persistence: contemporary landscape transformation in the Nanga Parbat region, northern Pakistan. Mountain Research and Development. 20(4): 348-355. [75264]
117. Pavlovic, Noel B.; White, Mark. 1989. Forest restoration of Lincoln Boyhood National Memorial: presettlement, existing vegetation, and restoration management recommendations. Research/Resources Management Report MWR-15. Omaha, NE: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Midwest Region. 106 p. [15375]
118. Plass, William T. 1975. An evaluation of trees and shrubs for planting surface-mine spoils. Res. Pap. NE-317. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 8 p. [46129]
119. Platt, Dwight R. 1973. Vascular plants of the Sand Prairie Natural History Reservation, Harvey County, Kansas. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. 76(1): 51-73. [75343]
120. Post, W. 1990. Nest survival in a large ibis-heron colony during a three-year decline to extinction. Waterbirds. 13(1): 50-61. [75274]
121. Putnam, Loren S. 1949. The life history of the cedar waxwing. The Wilson Bulletin. 61(3): 141-182. [75281]
122. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606]
123. Rasmussen, Steven D. 1990. No need to renovate--management is the answer! In: Great Plains Agricultuiral Council, compiler. Windbreaks: Living with the wind: Proceedings, windbreak renovation workshop; 1990 October 23-25; Hutchinson, KS. Great Plains Agriculture Council Publ. No. 133. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University, Cooperative Extension Service: 42-50. [15255]
124. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
125. Richter, Rebecca; Stromberg, Juliet C. 2005. Soil seed banks of two montane riparian areas: implications for restoration. Biodiversity and Conservation. 14(4): 993-1016. [60044]
126. Roberts, Warren G.; Howe, J. Greg; Major, Jack. 1980. A survey of riparian forest flora and fauna in California. In: Sands, Anne, ed. Riparian forests in California: Their ecology and conservation: Symposium proceedings; 1977 May 14; Davis, CA. Institute of Ecology Publication No. 15. Davis, CA: University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences: 3-19. [5271]
127. Rosburg, Thomas R.; Jurik, Thomas W.; Glenn-Lewin, David C. 1994. Seed banks of communities in the Iowa Loess Hills: ecology and potential contribution to restoration of native grassland. In: Wickett, Robert G.; Lewis, Patricia Dolan; Woodliffe, Allen; Pratt, Paul, eds. Spirit of the land, our prairie legacy: Proceedings, 13th North American prairie conference; 1992 August 6-9; Windsor, ON. Windsor, ON: Department of Parks and Recreation: 221-237. [24697]
128. Rosson, James F., Jr. 1994. Quercus stellata growth and stand characteristics in the Quercus stellata-Quercus marilandica forest type in the Cross Timbers region of central Oklahoma, [Online]. In: Fralish, James S.; Anderson, Roger C.; Ebinger, John E.; Szafoni, Robert, eds. Living in the edge: 1994 proceedings of the North American conference on savannas and barrens; 1994 October 15-16; Normal, IL. [Chicago, IL]: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Great Lakes Ecosystems (Producer). Available: [2007, April 24]. [41817]
129. Rothenberger, Steven J. 1985. Community analysis of the forest vegetation in the lower Platte River Valley, eastern Nebraska. Prairie Naturalist. 17(1): 1-14. [2031]
130. Rothenberger, Steven J. 1995. Plant community analysis of Schultz Prairie, Webster County, Nebraska. In: Hartnett, David C., ed. Prairie biodiversity: Proceedings, 14th North American prairie conference; 1994 July 12-16; Manhattan, KS. Manhattan, KS: Kansas State University: 35-41. [28225]
131. Rowell, Chester M. 1957. Summer flora of the Gene Howe Wildlife Management Area, Hemphill County, Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist. 2(4): 155-171. [75374]
132. Rundell, Hannelore; Woods, Michael. 2001. The vascular flora of Ech Lake, Alabama. Castanea. 66(4): 352-362. [75321]
133. Schneider, Jennifer; Maehr, David S.; Alexy, Karen J.; Cox, John J.; Larkin, Jeffery L.; Reeder, Brian C. 2006. Food habits of reintroduced elk in southeastern Kentucky. Southeastern Naturalist. 5(3): 535-546. [75259]
134. Schwartz, Mark W. 1994. Natural distribution and abundance of forest species and communities in northern Florida. Ecology. 75(3): 687-705. [49554]
135. Sheley, Roger; Manoukian, Mark; Marks, Gerald. 1999. Preventing noxious weed invasion. In: Sheley, Roger L.; Petroff, Janet K., eds. Biology and management of noxious rangeland weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press: 69-72. [35711]
136. Smith, D. Max; Kelly, Jeff F.; Finch, Deborah M. 2006. Wildfire, exotic vegetation, and breeding bird habitat in the Rio Grande bosque. In: Aguirre-Bravo, C.; Pellicane, Patrick J.; Burns, Denver P.; Draggan, Sidney, eds. Monitoring science and technology symposium proceedings: unifying knowledge for sustainability in the western hemisphere; 2004 September 20-24; Denver, CO. RMRS-P-42CD. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station: 230-237. [67910]
137. Spaulding, Perley. 1958. Diseases of foreign forest trees growing in the United States: An annotated list. Agriculture Handbook No. 139. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 118 p. [9945]
138. Sprackling, John A.; Read, Ralph A. 1979. Tree root systems in eastern Nebraska. Nebraska Conservation Bulletin Number 37. Lincoln, NE: The University of Nebraska, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Conservation and Survey Division. 71 p. [50196]
139. Springer, Joseph Tucker. 1988. Individual responses of some small mammals to a prairie fire. In: David, Arnold; Stanford, Geoffrey, eds. The prairie: roots of culture; foundation of our economy: Proceedings, 10th North American prairie conference; 1986 June 22-26; Denton, TX. Dallas, TX: Native Prairie Association of Texas: 20.03: 1-6. [25571]
140. Stapanian, Martin A. 1982. Evolution of fruiting strategies among fleshy-fruited plant species of eastern Kansas. Ecology. 63(5): 1422-1431. [12142]
141. Stark, N. 1966. Review of highway planting information appropriate to Nevada. Bulletin No. B-7. Reno, NV: University of Nevada, College of Agriculture, Desert Research Institute. 209 p. In cooperation with: Nevada State Highway Department. [47]
142. Steenhof, Karen; Berlinger, Stephen S.; Fredrickson, Leigh H. 1980. Habitat use by wintering bald eagles in South Dakota. The Journal of Wildlife Management. 44(4): 798-805. [75199]
143. Stephens, H. A. 1973. Woody plants of the North Central Plains. Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas. 530 p. [3804]
144. Steury, Brent W; Davis, Charles A. 2003. The vascular flora of Piscataway and Fort Washington National Parks, Prince Georges and Charles Counties, Maryland. Castanea. 68(4): 271-299. [73054]
145. Stevens, Lawrence E.; Ayers, Tina. 2002. The biodiversity and distribution of exotic vascular plants and animals in the Grand Canyon region. In: Tellman, Barbara, ed. Invasive exotic species in the Sonoran region. Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum Studies in Natural History. Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press; The Arizona-Sonora Desert Museum: 241-265. [48667]
146. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species comprising secondary plant succession in Northern Rocky Mountain forests. FEIS workshop: Postfire regeneration. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. 10 p. [20090]
147. Stieber, Michael T. 1971. The vascular flora of Anne Arundel County, Maryland: an annotated checklist. Castanea. 36(4): 263-312. [75361]
148. Strausbaugh, P. D.; Core, Earl L. 1977. Flora of West Virginia. 2nd ed. Morgantown, WV: Seneca Books, Inc. 1079 p. [23213]
149. Sundriyal, Manju; Sundriyal, R. C. 2001. Wild edible plants of the Sikkim Himalaya: nutritive values of selected species. Economic Botany. 55(3): 377-390. [75261]
150. Suzuki, Takeo; Kohno, Kiyoshi. 1987. Effects of pruning on the branching habit of Morus alba L. and the abscission of the apices of the short shoots. New Phytologist. 106(4): 753-758. [75130]
151. Swanson, David L.; Carlisle, Heather A.; Liknes, Eric T. 2003. Abundance and richness of neotropical migrants during stopover at farmstead woodlots and associated habitats in southeastern South Dakota. The American Midland Naturalist. 149(1): 176-191. [75253]
152. Swanson, David L.; Liknes, Eric T.; Dean, Kurtis L. 1999. Differences in migratory timing and energetic condition among sex/age classes in migrant ruby-crowned kinglets. The Wilson Bulletin. 111(1): 61-69. [75276]
153. Swearingen, J.; Reshetiloff, K.; Slattery, B.; Zwicker, S. 2002. Plant invaders of mid-Atlantic natural areas. [Washington, DC]: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service; Fish and Wildlife Service. 82 p. Available online: [2009, November 19]. [54192]
154. Taylor, Carl A. 1941. Germination behavior of tree seeds as observed in the regular handling of seed at the Seed Extractory and Nursery, Norfolk, Nebraska. Norfolk, NE: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Prairie States Forestry Project. 63 p. [47240]
155. Thomas, Lindsey Kay, Jr. 1980. The impact of three exotic plant species on a Potomac island. National Park Service Scientific Monograph Series No. 13. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service. 179 p. [41748]
156. Thompson, Ralph L. 1980. Woody vegetation and floristic affinities of Mingo Wilderness Area, a northern terminus of southern floodplain forest, Missouri. Castanea. 45(3): 194-212. [71732]
157. Thompson, Ralph L.; Vogel, Willis G.; Taylor, David D. 1984. Vegetation and flora of a coal surface-mined area in Laurel County, Kentucky. Castanea. 49(3): 111-126. [75263]
158. Tracy, Benjamin F.; Sanderson, Matt A. 2000. Patterns of plant species richness in pasture lands of the northeast United States. Plant Ecology. 149(2): 169-180. [75273]
159. Tu, Mandy; Hurd, Callie; Randall, John M., eds. 2001. Weed control methods handbook: tools and techniques for use in natural areas. Davis, CA: The Nature Conservancy. 194 p. [37787]
160. Tyser, Robin W.; Worley, Christopher A. 1992. Alien flora in grasslands adjacent to road and trail corridors in Glacier National Park, Montana (U.S.A.). Conservation Biology. 6(2): 253-262. [19435]
161. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 2004. Avian, arthropod, and plant communities on unburned and wildfire sites along the Middle Rio Grande--2004 annual report to Middle Rio Grande Conservancy District; Bosque del Apache National Wildlife Refuge. Albuquerque, NM: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 32 p. [61054]
162. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 2001. Guide to noxious weed prevention practices. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 25 p. Available online: /invasivespecies/documents/FS_WeedBMP_2001.pdf [2009, November 19]. [37889]
163. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2009. PLANTS Database, [Online]. Available: /. [34262]
164. Van Auken, O. W.; Ford, A. L.; Stein, A. 1979. A comparison of some woody upland and riparian plant communities of the southern Edwards Plateau. The Southwestern Naturalist. 24(1): 165-180. [10489]
165. Van Driesche, Roy; Lyon, Suzanne; Blossey, Bernd; Hoddle, Mark; Reardon, Richard, tech. coords. 2002. Biological control of invasive plants in the eastern United States. USDA Forest Service Publication FHTET-2002-04. [Washington, DC]: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 413 p. Available online: [2009, November 19]. [54194]
166. Varbalow, Theodore H. 1965. A study of the Tacony Creek Park area. The American Biology Teacher. 27(5): 371-376. [75368]
167. Vidra, Rebecca L.; Shear, Theodore H.; Wentworth, Thomas R. 2006. Testing the paradigms of exotic species invasion in urban riparian forests. Natural Areas Journal. 26(4): 339-350. [65080]
168. Voss, Edward G. 1985. Michigan flora. Part II. Dicots (Saururaceae--Cornaceae). Bulletin 59. Bloomfield Hills, MI: Cranbrook Institute of Science; Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Herbarium. 724 p. [11472]
169. Wales, Bruce A. 1972. Vegetation analysis of north and south edges in a mature oak-hickory forest. Ecological Monographs. 42(4): 451-471. [75157]
170. Wall, Dennis P.; Darwin, Steven P. 1999. Vegetation and elevational gradients within a bottomland hardwood forest of southeastern Louisiana. The American Midland Naturalist. 142(1): 17-30. [36450]
171. Weber, J. S.; Gibson, K. D. 2007. Exotic plant species in old-growth forest in Indiana. Weed Science. 55(4): 299-304. [75233]
172. Wells, Elizabeth Fortson; Brown, Rebecca Louise. 2000. An annotated checklist of the vascular plants in the forest at historic Mount Vernon, Virginia: a legacy from the past. Castanea. 65(4): 242-257. [47363]
173. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. The Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
174. White, David J.; Haber, Erich; Keddy, Cathy. 1993. Invasive plants of natural habitats in Canada: An integrated review of wetland and upland species and legislation governing their control. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Wildlife Service. 121 p. [71462]
175. Whitney, Gordon G.; Runkle, James R. 1981. Edge versus age effects in the development of a beech-maple forest. Oikos. 37(3): 377-381. [75187]
176. Wilson, Linda M.; McCaffrey, Joseph P. 1999. Biological control of noxious rangeland weeds. In: Sheley, Roger L.; Petroff, Janet K., eds. Biology and management of noxious rangeland weeds. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press: 97-115. [35715]
177. Wofford, B. Eugene. 1989. Guide to the vascular plants of the Blue Ridge. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press. 384 p. [12908]
178. Wolden, L. G.; Stromberg, J. C.; Patten, D. T. 1995. Flora and vegetation of the Hassayampa River Preserve, Maricopa County, Arizona. Journal of the Arizona-Nevada Academy of Science. 28(1/2): 76-111. [76988]
179. Wunderlin, Richard P. 1982. Guide to the vascular plants of central Florida. Tampa, FL: University Presses of Florida. 472 p. [13125]
180. Wunderlin, Richard P.; Hansen, Bruce F. 2003. Guide to the vascular plants of Florida. 2nd edition. Gainesville, FL: The University of Florida Press. 787 p. [69433]
181. Wyman, Donald. 1950. Fruiting habits of certain ornamental plants. Arnoldia. 10(13): 81-85. [51894]
182. Yost, Susan E.; Antenen, Susan; Harvigsen, Gregg. 1991. The vegetation of the Wave Hill Natural Area, Bronx, New York. Torreya. 118(3): 312-325. [16546]

FEIS Home Page