Skip navigational links  About Us Contact FS FAQ'S Newsroom
[Header with links to]: USDA Forest Service
[Header]: logos and links to USDA and Forest Service
link to USDA homepagelink to Forest Service homepage

 WFW Home
 Endangered Species

 Appeals & Litigation
 Acronyms & Terms
 Continuing Education
 Career Information
 Publications & Literature

 Public Participation
 For the Kids
 WFRP Management System
 Burned Area Emergency Rehabilitation (BAER)

WFW Home
 WFW Site Index
 Contact WFW

Ecology Units & Teams

Wildlife Ecology Unit

Fish & Aquatic Ecology Unit

Stream Systems Technology Center

Watershed, Fish, Wildlife, Air & Rare Plants

Wildlife Ecology Unit


Two papers that describe the PIF process for identifying species at risk (submitted by Kathy Paulin, Ashley NF):

  • Carter, Hunter, Pashley and Rosenburg. 2000. Setting conservation priorities for landbirds in the United States:The Partners in Flight approach. Auk 117(2):541-548.(USFS access to provided by DigiTop)

  • Beissinger, Reed, Wunderle, Robinson and Finch. 2000. Report of the AOU conservation committee on the Partners in Flight species prioritization plan. Auk 117(2):549-561. (USFS access to provided by DigiTop)

The following paper is not new, but it's an excellent review of different classes of PVA techniques, with caveats for applying them in a management context. Fred Samson hands this out at every viability meeting, so it's time you read it! (submitted by Christina Hargis for Fred Samson):

  • Beissinger, S. R. and M. I. Westphal. 1998. On the use of demographic models of population viability in endangered species management. J. Wildl. Manage. 62:821-841. (USFS access to JSTOR provided by National Forest Service Library/NFSL)

This paper provides criteria for selecting focal species. I'm not sure I agree with all the criteria, but it is thought-provoking. (submitted by Clint McCarthy, R4):

  • Caro, T. M. and G. O'Doherty. 1999. On the use of surrogate species in conservation biology. Cons. Bio. 13:805-814.

A recent review of road effects. This is just one paper in a volume on this subject (submitted by Christina Hargis):

  • Trombulak, S. C. and C. A. Frissell. 2000. Review of ecological effects of roads on terrestrial and aquatic communities. Cons. Bio. 14:18-30. (USFS access to provided by DigiTop)

Disclaimers | Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) | Privacy Notice

Wildlife Ecology Unit
Author: Christina D. Vojta
Expires: none

USDA Forest Service
1400 Independence Ave., SW
Washington, D.C.
(202) 205-8333