USDA Forest Service - Research & Development
RMRS - Rocky Mountain Research Station (Logo & FS Shield)
Print Page
 

   
Arrow Bullet Order printed copies
Arrow Bullet New Publications
Arrow Bullet FS INFO: Online index of natural resources publications, including Forest Service literature and glossaries.
Arrow Bullet Technical Help: Problems or questions with our site?
   

Rocky Mountain Research Station
240 West Prospect Road
Fort Collins, CO 80526-2098

Switchboard: 970-498-1100
Fax: 970-498-1010

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service.

USA.gov logo USDA Link Forest Service Link

RMRS-GTR-313: Effectiveness of post-fire Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) road treatments: Results from three wildfires


Citation: Foltz, Randy B.; Robichaud, Peter, R. 2013. Effectiveness of post-fire Burned Area Emergency Response (BAER) road treatments: Results from three wildfires. RMRS-GTR-313. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 40 p.

Abstract: Wildland fires often cause extreme changes in the landscape that drastically influence surface runoff and soil erosion, which can impact forest resources, aquatic habitats, water supplies, public safety, and forest access infrastructure such as forest roads. Little information is available on the effectiveness of various post-fire road treatments, thus this study was designed to evaluate common treatments implemented after fire. The 2006 Tripod Complex, 2007 Cascade Complex, and the 2008 Klamath Theater Complex Fires were selected because of their large size and extensive use of road treatments. Two of the three locations had below average precipitation and all three had precipitation that did not achieve the post-fire road treatment design storms. With this amount of precipitation testing, all of the treatments we monitored met the design objectives. All three of the locations had large soil loss in the first year after the fire followed by a quick recovery of ground cover to 40 to 50 percent at the end of year one. Soil loss from roadside hydromulch was not statistically significant from control (no treatment) on the Tripod Complex sites. Soil loss at the Cascade Complex sites was a statistically significant difference on the straw mulch compared to the control (no treatment), but there were no different pairwise differences among straw mulch, Polyacrylamide (PAM), and Woodstraw™. This suggests that the amount of cover is more important than the type of cover. Three studies and 5 years after beginning the studies, we think the best approach to assessing the effectiveness of post-fire BAER road treatments is to gain a limited knowledge of many sites along a road system rather than a detailed knowledge of a few sites.

Keywords: erosion, assessment, values at risk, recovery, road failures

About PDFs: For best results, don't open PDFs in your Web browser. Right-click on the PDF link and download the PDF file to your computer. More PDF help.

Download: http://www.fs.fed.us/rm/pubs/rmrs_gtr313.pdf
PDF File Size: 3.2 MB

USDA Forest Service - Rocky Mountain Research Station Publications
Publish Date: September 9, 2013
Last Modified: September 9, 2013

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.