Forest Regulations are Rigorous throughout much of the Americas, but Implementation Remains a Challenge in Latin America
Although forestry rules and regulations for private land are often stricter and more comprehensive in Central and South America than in the United States, poor implementation in many cases make them ineffective and underscores the need for better enforcement and incentives.
Since the first Earth Summit in 1991, most countries in the Americas have revised their forest laws and regulations significantly to achieve sustainable forest management. Forest Service scientists wanted to know more about the intended and actual effects of these laws on forest sustainability and how they compare among countries. This has not been studied extensively, but is crucial to the effective design and implementation of good forest governance.
A group of forest policy scientists from throughout the Americas and the Forest Service conducted a study that examined key components of natural forest management and how they are addressed through legislation and other policy directives in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Costa Rica, Guatemala, Nicaragua, Paraguay, Uruguay, and the United States. They found that, on paper, Latin America has more rigorous and comprehensive (i.e., stricter thresholds on more environmental, economic, and social aspects) forestry rules for private land than much of the United States.
Overall, the protection of at-risk species and riparian buffers are required in all countries and include specific prescriptions in most; forest management planning and secure, legal land title or tenancy are commonly required; and mandatory processes to protect soil and water quality are customary. Less common requirements include forest monitoring, social and economic aspects; when in place, they are usually voluntary.
Significant efforts have been made to improve governmental forest regulation and to increase the transparency and legality of timber production and commerce in the tropics. However, competing land uses, unclear tenure, and limited institutional capacity for effective implementation and enforcement of forest legislation continue to be significant challenges for advancing the sustainability of forest management in many Latin American countries.
Ultimately, the researchers stress that it is not the number, rigor, or comprehensiveness of rules and regulations related to forest sustainability that matter as much as the implementation and application of sound practices on the ground. These factors ultimately depend on the appropriate mix and balance of mandatory requirements for sustainable forest management, voluntary guidelines, information, education, and laissez faire.
|Regulating the sustainability of forest management in the Americas: Cross-country comparisons of forest legislation||(publication)|
Forest Service Partners