Your Comments Are Needed!
PLEASE share this information widely with your networks and others who might like to share their comments with the Access Board.
Your comments concerning the Access Board's proposed Outdoor Developed Areas accessibility guidelines are needed. Our Forest Service Outdoor Recreation Accessibility Guidelines and Forest Service Trail Accessibility Guidelines accessibility will remain in place as legally mandated in the National Forest System... even after the Access Board's guidelines finalize. EXCEPT...the Forest Service (FS) will have to change any technical specifications in our FS guidelines that are a lower standard then the Access Board's ....where the Forest Service has taken exceptions that the Access Board’s guidelines do not take. All other areas and formats where the FS is equal to or higher than the Access Board will stay the same.
There are 9 Access Board technical specifications that are higher or different about which the FS is very concerned. If these specifications are not changed by the Access Board in their final guidelines, they will have serious impacts on the natural settings of FS trails and developed recreation sites. Those 9 specifics are explained in the attached document.
If you share the Forest Service's concern that accessibility should be maximized but the natural setting should not be changing when doing so......please send your comments... in your own words... to the Access Board. The comment period closes on October 18th. Please send in your comments before the time slips away.
Also...if you personally feel strongly about these issues....you are free to comment from your personal/home e-mail system, as a member of the public and to share these issues with your family and friends for them to comment as well. The comment opportunities are not limited to official organizations only, although those comments are also important.
You may submit comments, identified by Docket No. 2007–02, by any of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments.
E-mail: email@example.com. Include Docket No. 2007–02 in the subject line of the message.
Fax: (202) 272–0081.
Mail or Hand Delivery: Office of Technical and Information Services, Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, 1331 F Street, NW., suite 1000, Washington, DC 20004–1111.
submissions received must include "U.S. Access Board" and
"Docket No. 2007–02" (the docket number for this rulemaking). All
comments received will be posted without change to http://www.access-board.gov, including any personal
information provided. All comments must be submitted by
Differences between the Proposed Access Board Guidelines and
Forest Service Trail Accessibility Guidelines (FSTAG) and
· More detail addressing the unique aspects of trails is needed in the final Access Board proposed guidelines. For example, the proposed guidelines only include 3 definitions related to trails while there are 32 definitions related to trails in the FSTAG.
· The proposed Access Board guidelines have added the definition for alteration that applies to buildings but does not fit trails. The final Access Board guidelines need to clarify that definition of alteration does not apply to trails.
· The definitions for alteration and for maintenance of trails in the original Regulatory Negotiation Committee’s 1999 Report (page 6) must be included in the definitions section of the final Access Board guidelines, just as they are in the definitions section of the FSTAG. Those original report definitions are clear and applicable to the trails.
· In the proposed Access Board guidelines, there is no exception provided for protruding objects below 80 inches in height when they occur on a trail where placing a warning barrier would block passage down the trail. Such an exception is needed in the final Access Board guidelines.
· The proposed Access Board guidelines include the International Symbol of Accessibility (the ISA, which is the wheelchair symbol) in each of the sample trail signs. The use of that symbol in relation to trails will lead the public to expect an ease of access that will not be there even when a trail complies fully with the guidelines because grades up to 12.5 percent are appropriately allowable under the guidelines. Instead, the final Access Board guidelines should not use the ISA, but should require information be to be posted that is useful to all trail users in determining which trail best meets their skills and available resources, including maximum grade, cross slope, minimum width and so forth, as detailed in the FSTAG 7.3.10.
· The Access Board has rewritten the 2nd General Exception. It no longer states what the Regulatory Negotiation Committee Report intended. As it currently written it is confusing and appears to imply that only 15 percent of the length of a trail ever needs to be accessible, which is not correct. The final Access Board guidelines must go back to the original Regulatory Negotiation Committee’s language for the 2nd General Exception.
· The Interagency Trail Data Standards (ITDS) have been adopted by the Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, National Park Service, Fish and Wildlife Service and Bureau of Outdoor Recreation. The ITDS include standardized trail terminology, definitions, and standardized management concepts including Trail Classes, Designed Uses and Managed Uses. The final Access Board guidelines must integrate the ITDS terminology, definitions and trail-management concepts of trail classes, designed use and designated use, including within the Conditions of Departure, in order for the final Access Board guidelines to be useable within the federal agencies trails structure. The ITDS website is http://www.nps.gov/gis/trails.
· Outdoor Recreation Access Routes (ORARs) should not be required in areas that are not developed recreation sites. In areas where facilities/constructed features such as fire-rings or pit toilets are placed primarily because they are needed for resource protection, including adjacent to trails and in undeveloped areas, the trail specifications should apply to the route to the facilities rather than the ORAR specifications, in order to blend the route to those facilities into the undeveloped setting. Facilities constructed or altered anywhere, including adjacent to trails or in undeveloped areas, must be both appropriate to the setting and accessible, in compliance with the Architectural Barriers Act requirement of facility access for all.
The proposed Access Board guidelines only address the routes to facilities in developed recreation areas. The final Access Board guidelines need to make a distinction between developed recreation areas and undeveloped areas where facilities are placed primarily for resource protection. Unless that distinction is made, the FSORAG will have to be changed so that facilities in undeveloped areas would be required to be connected to an ORAR and that would have negative impact on undeveloped areas.
However, the proposed Access Board guidelines do not permit any exceptions to the ORARs technical specifications, regardless of the terrain, historic, cultural or environmental factors, even in alteration/reconstruction situations. The final Access Board guidelines need to include an exception for ORARs in alterations of existing sites, so when a section of an ORAR in those alteration locations can’t meet the ORAR maximum-grade specifications there is an exception available.
If the final Access Board guidelines do not include such an exception, the FSORAG will have to be changed to not permit any exceptions to meeting the ORAR specifications in alterations of existing sites. That change would have a negative impact on incorporating accessibility while protecting the natural environment at existing recreation areas
Any questions concerning this summary document should be directed to Janet Zeller, USDA Forest Service National Accessibility Program Manager, at firstname.lastname@example.org.