| File Code: 1920
Date: December 30, 2002
Greetings,
After reviewing public comments and completing an internal review, I have
determined that no areas on the Hoosier National Forest qualify as a
roadless area. Fourteen areas were reviewed to determine if they met eight
specific roadless characteristics. None of the fourteen areas met all eight
roadless characteristics. Specifically, road density, the presence of non
Forest Service jurisdiction roads, powerlines, pipelines, and inability for
an area to be conducive to the perpetuation of wilderness values
disqualified all the areas.
While reviewing areas on the Hoosier National Forest for possible
inclusion as inventoried roadless areas and recommendations as wilderness, I
have to look closely at what areas meet all the roadless criteria, including
which areas do or do not meet the opportunity to provide solitude based on
information identified in Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS). ROS is a
combination of activities, settings, and probable experience opportunities
that have been arranged along a continuum. There are six classes in ROS that
are defined (primitive, semi-primitive non-motorized, semi-primitive
motorized, roaded natural, rural, and urban) and these classes help planners
identify areas of the National Forest that a certain experience has the
greatest opportunity to occur (USDA 1986). Specifically, we looked at areas
that meet primitive and semi-primitive the ROS class.
A contractor mapped the criteria of the ROS to the Hoosier National
Forest. The results indicated there are no areas on the forest that meet the
primitive ROS class. Three areas on the forest meet semi-primitive ROS
class. These semi-primitive areas are portions of Mogan Ridge, Nebo Ridge,
and the Charles C. Deam Wilderness. However, when all eight criteria were
applied to Mogan Ridge and Nebo Ridge, they did not qualify as roadless.
The Hoosier National Forest did not want to improperly disqualify an area
without taking a hard look at applying the roadless characteristics to all
areas on the forest that had the greatest potential of meeting those
characteristics. For this reason, many areas on the forest were reviewed,
even though it may have appeared they did not to meet the roadless
characteristics. However, I wanted to ensure the forest planning team
applied the roadless characteristics to all areas so I could make a proper
decision regarding roadless areas.
The attached table (Table 1) addresses all fourteen areas reviewed. This
table identifies the existing conditions that disqualified an area from
further consideration as a roadless area. The first four conditions, which
disqualify most of the areas, have to do with items not under Forest Service
control. We mapped Nebo Ridge, the only area not disqualified by the first
four conditions, three different ways to evaluate whether it met the
roadless criteria. We ended up with an area shaped in such a way that it
would not perpetuate wilderness values.
Thank you for your interest regarding the review of potential roadless
areas on the Hoosier National Forest. We look forward to your input on
upcoming Forest Plan revision topics.
If you have any questions, please contact Eric Sandeno at 812-275-5987.
Sincerely,
/s/ Wilma Reed
Marine
KENNETH G. DAY
Forest Supervisor
Enclosure
Table 1 below indicates why an area is not being considered for inclusion
as a roadless area on the Hoosier National Forest.
Table 1
|
Area |
Existing conditions which disqualify an
area for consideration |
|
|
Non-obtainable subsurface rights |
Pipeline or powerline through area |
Non-Forest Service jurisdiction roads |
Does not have 2,500 acres primitive or
semi-primitive |
Exceeds road density |
Exceeds non-native planted vegetation |
Focus of Archaeological research |
Roads needed for barren, forest opening,
or pond maintenance |
Inholdings, private dwellings, or
developed facilities |
Does not perpetuate wilderness values |
|
Happy Hollow |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
Lick Creek |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
Danner Cemetery |
X |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
|
X |
|
Porter Hollow |
|
|
|
X |
X |
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Mogan Ridge |
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
Middle Deer Creek |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
Mt. Pleasant |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Felknor Hollow |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
Nebo Ridge * |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
Hickory Ridge |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
|
X |
|
Mt. Nebo Church |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
Tincher Hollow |
X |
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
Deckard Ridge |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
|
Sam’s Creek |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
X |
X |
X |
* Note – This represents the review of the third re-mapping of Nebo
Ridge.
|