| [Jump to the main content of this page] |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
USDA Forest Service |
Limits of Acceptable Change: January 2007 NewsletterView word version of this newsletter View pdf version of this newsletter Dear Friend of the Red River Gorge, We have completed Step 5 of the LAC process and initiated Step 6! Step 5 was “specify measurable standards for resource & social indicators for each opportunity zone”. We developed a table of resource standards for each of the six opportunity zones and a similar table of social standards. Step 5 was a key component of the entire LAC process. To update yourself on what was accomplished in Step 5, see the article in this newsletter. Step 6 workshops began in late fall of 2006. Step 6 is “identify alternative opportunity zone allocations”. During Step 6, we will select alternatives for mapping the opportunity zones identified in Step 2 by reviewing all the previous steps. The alternatives should relate back to the original issues. There is no set number of alternatives that we should select, often it is somewhere between three and six. Maps showing locations for the six opportunity zones will be produced for each alternative. The next LAC workshop on Step 6 has been scheduled for Tuesday, January 23, at TrueNorth Outfitters in Wolfe County. We have also scheduled an LAC informational meeting for Tuesday, January 16, at TrueNorth Outfitters. This informational meeting will be a review of Steps 1-6 and what has been accomplished thus far. This will be a great opportunity for people that have not been involved in the LAC process to get caught up and see what LAC is all about! Thank you for your continued involvement in the LAC process. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. Sincerely, Tim Eling
To bring interested public up to date, there will
be an LAC informational meeting on January 16, 2007. This meeting
will be held at TrueNorth Outfitters from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m.
STEP 5 OF LAC PROCESS Using data collected in Step 4, it was possible to specify standards
that describe the acceptable and appropriate conditions for each indicator
in each opportunity zone. For instance, a standard for condition class of system trails may be “no worse than cc 4” for the roaded natural opportunity zone. What this means is that we will allow system trails in the roaded natural zone up to a condition class of 4. If the trail moves into a condition class 5, then we have exceeded our limit of acceptable change and some sort of action is needed to bring the condition back into standard. Before selecting standards for indicators, the descriptions of the six opportunity zones were reviewed in order to understand what the overall desired future condition is for that zone. For example, the description for the pristine opportunity zone states that there are no official system trails. There was no standard developed for condition class since there should be no trails.
How standards were developed during Step 5:
LOOKING AHEAD TO STEP 7 The final product of Step 7 is a list or maps of all places where existing conditions are worse than standard and identification of what management actions would best bring conditions up to standard. STEP 6 OF LAC PROCESS The purpose of this step is to decide what resource and social conditions are to be maintained or achieved in specific areas of the Gorge. This is a prescriptive step (it is concerned with establishing what should be), and input from both the Forest Service and the public should be used to make these decisions. Step 6 involves an analysis of inventory data collected in Step 4, along with area issues and concerns identified in Step 1. Some issues might prove mutually contradictory (“increase opportunities for easier access into most portions of the wilderness” and “provide greater opportunities for solitude”). During Step 6, we will select alternatives for mapping the opportunity
zones by reviewing all the previous steps. The alternatives should relate
back to the original issues. There is no set number of alternatives that
we should select, often it is somewhere between three and six. Maps
showing locations for the six opportunity zones identified in Step 2
will be produced for each alternative.
Address: Daniel
Boone National Forest Daniel
Boone National Forest E-mail: Phone: Tim
Eling, LAC Coordinator: Fax: (859)
744-1568 Winchester Website: http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/boone/lac Author: Tim Eling |
||||||||||||||||||||||