TABLE 1. MATRIX OF FACTORS AND INDICATORS
High Cascades Physiographic Region
|
FACTORS
|
INDICATORS |
PROPERLY FUNCTIONING |
AT RISK |
NOT PROPERLY FUNCTIONING |
Water Quality |
Temperature |
2nd-3rd order basins: <52 degrees F 4th and larger basins: <55 " " |
2nd-3rd order: 52-55 degrees F 4th+ order: 55-58 degrees F |
2nd-3rd order basins: >55 degrees F 4th order and larger: > 58 degrees F |
|
|
Sediment/ Turbidity * |
<12% fines (<0.85 mm) in gravel, turbidity low, or cobble embeddedness <35% |
12-17% fines (<0.85mm) in gravel |
> 17% fines (<0.85mm) in gravels, turbidity high, or cobble embeddedness >35% |
|
|
Chemical Contamination/ Nutrients |
Low levels of chemical contaminants from agricultural, industrial and other sources, no excess nutrients, no CWA 303d | designated reaches (5) |
|
Mod+ levels of chemical contamination from agricultural, industrial and other sources, any level of excess nutrients, one or more CWA 303d designated reaches (5) |
Habitat Access |
Physical Barriers |
Any man-made barriers present in watershed allow upstream and downstream fish passage at all flows of age 1+ salmonids |
|
Any man-made barriers present in watershed do not allow upstream and/or downstream fish passage at a range of flows of age 1+ salmonids |
Habitat Elements |
Substrate * |
Dominant substrate is gravel or cobble (interstitial spaces clear), embeddedness <20% |
Gravel and/or cobble is sub-dominant, or if dominant, embeddedness 20-35% (3) |
Bedrock, sand, silt, or small gravel dominant, or if gravel and cobble dominant, embeddedness >35% (2) |
|
|
Large Woody Debris1) |
>30 pieces/mile, >12" diameter and >35 feet in length. Adequate sources of future LWD to maintain the above standard. Little evidence of stream clean-out or management related debris flows. |
20-30 pieces/mile, >12" and >35 ft. in length or lacks potential sources of LWD sufficient to maintain or achieve the fully fuctioning standard. |
Does not meet standards for properly functioning and lacks potential sources of LWD. Evidence of stream clean-out and/or management related debris flows. |
|
|
Pool Characteristics2) * |
>30% pool habitat by area. Little reduction in pool volume due to filling by fine sediment or unsorted substrates. |
>30% pool habitat by area but with obvious filling by fines or unsorted substrates or <30% pool habitat by area and little reduction in pool volume due to filling. |
<30% pool habitat by area and obvious reduction in pool volume due to filling with fines and/or unsorted substrates. |
|
|
Off-channel Habitat * |
Water velocity refugia present. Backwaters frequent and the result of structural influence (LWD). Side channel connectivity maintained. |
|
Little or no velocity refugia. Few or no backwaters, no off-channel ponds. Evidence of abandoned side channels due to past management activities. |
|
Habitat Elements (Con't) |
Refugia (important remnant habitat for sensitive aquatic species) |
Habitat refugia exist and are adequately buffered (e.g. by intact riparian reserves); existing refugia are sufficient in size, number and connectivity to maintain viable populations or sub-populations. |
Habitat refugia exist but are not adequately buffered (e.g.by intact riparian reserves); existing refugia are insufficient in size, number and connectivity to maintain viable populations or sub-populations. |
Adequate habitat refugia do not exist. |
|
Channel Condition and Dynamics |
Width/Depth Ratio |
W/D ratio and channel types are within historic ranges and site potential as per Rosgen typing. |
|
W/D ratios and channel types are outside of historic ranges and site potentials. |
|
|
Streambank Condition * |
Basinwide, in low gradient reaches, > 90% stable; i.e., on average, less than 10% of banks are actively eroding. |
Basinwide, in low gradient reaches, stream banks 80-90% stable. Active erosion limited to outcurves. |
<80% of streambanks are stable. Active erosion widespread throughout basin in low gradient reaches. |
|
|
Floodplain Connectivity * |
Off-channel areas are frequently hydrologically linked to main channel; overbank flows occur and maintain wetland functions, riparian vegetation and succession. |
|
Obvious reduction in hydrologic connectivity between off-channel, wetland, floodplain and riparian areas; wetland extent noticably reduced and riparian vegetation/ succession altered significantly. |
Flow/Hydrology |
Drainage Network |
Little increase in drainage network due to roads. |
|
Substantial increases in drainage network density due to roads (e.g. ~20-25%) |
Watershed Conditions |
Road Density & Location |
<2 mi/mi2, with no valley bottom roads. |
2-3 mi/mi2, with some valley bottom roads. |
>3 mi/mi square and/or substantial amount of valley bottom roads. |
|
|
Disturbance History |
<5% ECA/decade (entire watershed) with no concentration of disturbance in unstable or potentially unstable areas, and/or refugia, and/or riparian reserves. |
|
>5% ECA/decade (entire watershed) and disturbance concentrated in unstable or potentially unstable areas, and/or refugia, and/or riparian reserves. |
|
|
Riparian Reserves |
Riparian Reserves are intact, with >80% in late seral condition. |
|
Riparian Reserves are fragmented, poorly connected or provide inadequate protection of habitats and refugia for sensitive aquatic species. <80% are in late seral condition. |
|
|
Landslide Rates |
Within 20% of historic natural rates. Stream conditions not evidently altered due to management | related landslides. |
|
Not within 20% of historic natural rates. Stream conditions obviously altered by management related landslides. |
1) LWD numerics are not applicable in meadow reaches.
2) Pool characteristic numerics are applicable to 3rd order or larger basins.
*= Numeric values for Elements followed with the "*" symbol will be determined by measurements or estimates taken in
low-gradient (<2%) , adjustable segments. These elements are not applicable if none are present.