|
![]() |
||
![]()
Main
Applications
|
|
Introduction
Surface View of Blowdown Aerial View of Blowdown
BWCAW Fuel Treatment Environmental Impact Statement (2001)
FETM was selected as the landscape disturbance model for evaluating five different fuel treatment alternatives in the Fuel Treatment EIS, including the No Action alternative.
In brief, FETM showed the tradeoff between the various fuel treatment alternatives in terms of the total number of wildfire acres burned annually (see graphs below) and annual smoke emissions from both wildfire and prescribed fire. Alternative B was found to have the lowest impact overall out to about 30 years. Beyond that, the alternatives were virtually identical in terms of wildfire acres burned.
Click here for more information on the BWCAW storm event. The Fuel Treatment EIS can be found online (EIS Document), with sections specifically dealing with FETM on wildfire and vegetation effects (sections 3.3 and 3.7, respectively).
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Copyright © [2003] [US Forest Service] [Revised July 6, 2004]