PLANNING PROCESS - STAGE TWO
Last year, as we continued to meet with community leaders and interested stakeholders (in particular those with a fondness for recreation in the monument), it became clear we needed to formulize a plan for the next steps for the collaborative planning process. We were developing desired conditions and identifying a decision framework for addressing values and issues, but we were not prepared to delve into the other major issues the management plan needed to address. For us to fully develop an environmental document that analyzes the social, economic, and environmental aspects of management, we need to disclose and identify information gaps.
The forest realizes much of the discussion and debate about management in the monument focuses on how we treat vegetation and where we implement fire or fuels treatments on the landscape. But information is needed as it relates to who visits the monument, where they come from, how people like to recreate, and what are the impacts of our management on the local community? We have some of this information from national recreation surveys, but it would be helpful to have a local survey implemented. We also need to understand what are in the groves.
It is important to note science
advisories were developed in 2003 when the
Besides starting a couple of
research projects, we also have instituted two pilots to improve how we
communicate with the public and integrate others into the analysis
process. The
The enclosed powerpoint showcases all the elements of stage two for development of a Giant Sequoia National Monument Plan.