USDA Forest Service
 

Pacific Southwest Research Station

 

Pacific Southwest Research Station
800 Buchanan Street
West Annex Building
Albany, CA 94710-0011

(510) 559-6300

United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service. USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.

Programs and Projects

(RWU-4202)

Sierra Nevada Research Center

Topic

Science Consistency Review Final Report of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) for the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan.

On 30-31 July 2003, a science consistency review (SCR) team was convened by the Pacific Southwest Research Station in Davis CA, to evaluate the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (DSEIS) for the Sierra Nevada Forest Plan. A Science Consistency Review is defined as the process used to determine whether an analysis or decision document is consistent with the best available science. That review is accomplished by judging whether scientific information of appropriate content, rigor, and applicability has been considered, evaluated, and synthesized in the documents that underlie and that implement land management decisions.

Team members were given copies of the DSEIS prior to the SCR review meeting. At the meeting, discussions were held among the team, the technical experts and designated representatives of the Pacific Southwest Regional Forester responsible for the DSEIS, and the review administrators. Those discussions led to the identification and development of specific elements or topics within the DSEIS that warranted individual scrutiny by one or another of the team members. These elements represent a distillation of the crucial scientific topics addressed in the DSEIS, as viewed by the team. The context for that scrutiny was the standardized set of science consistency evaluation criteria (Guldin and others, in press):

1) Has applicable and available scientific information been considered?
2) Is the scientific information interpreted reasonably and accurately?
3) Are the uncertainties associated with the scientific information acknowledged
and documented?
4) Have the relevant management consequences, including risks and uncertainties,
been identified and documented?

The team's report is available below as well as an appendix that contains all of the original reviews submitted to the review administrators by each team member.

Science Consistency Review Final Report

Science Consistency Review Final Report Appendix

 

Last Modified: Aug 9, 2005 07:14:39 AM