Demonstration of Ecosystem Management Options Study

DEMO Home > Publications > General

Publications and Presentations

GENERAL

Published Papers

Abbott, R.; White, J.; Woodard, B. 1999. The benefits and challenges of large-scale silvicultural experiments: perspectives from forest managers on the Demonstration of Ecosystem Management Options (DEMO) study. Northwest Science. 73(Special Issue): 118-125.

Amaranthus, M.; DeBell, D.; White, J.; Woodard, B. 1993. Demonstration of Ecosystem Management Options (DEMO): a cooperative effort between NFS and research in the Pacific Northwest. In: Silviculture: from the cradle of forestry to ecosystem management. Proceedings of the national silviculture workshop. Gen. Tech. Rep. SE-GTR-088. Asheville, NC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station: 124-130.

Anderson, D. 1994. The Little River AMA: a different way of doing business. Western Forester. 39(8): 8-9.

Aubry, K.; Amaranthus, M.; Halpern, C.; White, J.; Woodard, B.; Peterson, C., Jr.; Lagoudakis, C.; Horton, A. 1999. Evaluating the effects of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention: experimental design of the DEMO study. Northwest Science. 73(Special Issue): 12-26.

Aubry, K.; Halpern, C.; Maguire, D. 2004. Ecological effects of variable-retention harvests in the Northwestern United States: the DEMO study. Forest Snow and Landscape Research. 78: 119-134.

Aubry, K.B.; Halpern, C.B.; Peterson, C.E. 2009. Variable-retention harvests in the Pacific Northwest: a review of short-term findings from the DEMO study. Forest Ecology and Management 258: 398-408.

DeBell, D.; Curtis, R. 1993. Silviculture and new forestry in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Forestry. 91(12): 25-30.

Esterholdt, K.; White, J. 1995. DEMO: a Research/NFS cooperative effort. Forestry Research West. August: 4-7.

Franklin, J.; Berg, D.; Thornburgh, D.; Tappeiner, J. 1997. Alternative silvicultural approaches to timber harvesting: variable retention harvest systems. In: Kohm, K.; Franklin, J., eds. Creating a forestry for the 21st century: the science of ecosystem management. Washington, DC: Island Press: 111-139.

Franklin, J.; Norris, L.; Berg, D.; Smith, G. 1999. The history of DEMO: an experiment in regeneration harvest of Northwestern forest ecosystems. Northwest Science. 73(Special Issue): 3-11.

Halpern, C.; Raphael, M., eds. 1999. Retention harvests in Northwestern forest ecosystems: the Demonstration of Ecosystem Management Options (DEMO) study. Northwest Science. 73(Special Issue).

Maguire, D.; Canavan, S.; Halpern, C.; Aubry, K. 2005. Fate of taxa after variable-retention harvesting in Douglas-fir forests of the Northwestern United States. In: Peterson, C.; Maguire, D., eds. Balancing ecosystem values: innovative experiments for sustainable forestry. Proceedings of a conference. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-635. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: 271-279.

Peterson, C.; Maguire, D., eds. 2005. Balancing ecosystem values: innovative experiments for sustainable forestry. Proceedings of a conference. Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-635. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station. 389 p..

Peterson, C.; Szaro, R., eds. 2006. Building a foundation for sustainable science-based forest management: long-term multi-purpose experiments in the forest sector. Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung. 177(6/7): 97-98 [Special Issue].

Peterson, C.E.; Anderson, P.D. 2009. Large-scale interdisciplinary experiments inform current and future forestry management options in the U.S. Pacific Northwest. Forest Ecology and Management. 258: 409-414.

Szaro, R.; Peterson, C. 2004. Evolving approaches toward science-based forest management. Forest Snow and Landscape Research. 78: 9-20.

Szaro, R.; Peterson, C.; von Gadow, K.; Kräuchi, N., eds. 2004. Creating a legacy for sustainable science-based forest management: lessons learned from field experiments. Forest Snow and Landscape Research. 78 (1/2). 208 p.

Szaro, R.; Peterson, C. 2005. Balancing ecosystem values: innovative experiments for sustainably managing forests. Proceedings of the 22nd IUFRO world congress. Forests in the balance: linking tradition and technology. International Forestry Review. 7(5): 414 [Abstract].

Szaro, R.; Peterson, C.; von Gadow, K. 2006. Operational experiments for sustainably managing forests (Grossflächige Feldversuche für die nachhaltige Waldnutzung). Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung. 177(6/7): 98-104. [Special Issue].

Thompson, J. 2007. Green-tree retention in harvest units: boon or bust for biodiversity. PNW Science Findings. 96. 5 p.

Presentations/Posters

Abbott, R.; Nakae, J. 1999. DEMO: a study of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention in western Oregon and Washington. Central Cascades AMA Workshop: Ecosystem Management: Beyond the Buzzwords, Springfield, OR.

Abbott, R.; Nakae, J. 2001. DEMO: a study of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention in western Oregon and Washington. USFS National Silvicultural Workshop, Hood River, OR.

Aubry, K.; Halpern, C.; Maguire, D. 2003. Ecological effects of variable-retention harvests in the Northwestern United States: the DEMO study. IUFRO conference: Applied Forest Ecological Experiments, Swiss Federal Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland.

Aubry, K.; Peterson, C. 2008. Ecological and aesthetic effects of variable-retention harvests in the northwestern United States: initial results from the DEMO study. 9th conference in the Sir Mark Oliphant International Frontiers of Science and Technology Series: Old Forests, New Management. CRC for Forestry and Forestry Tasmania, with support from IUFRO, Hobart, Tasmania.

Maguire, D.; Canavan, S.; Halpern, C.; Aubry, K.; Peterson, C. 2003. Ecological responses to variable-retention harvesting in Douglas-fir forests: synthesis and integration. IUFRO Conference: Applied Forest Ecological Experiments, Swiss Federal Institute for Snow and Avalanche Research SLF, Davos, Switzerland.

Peterson, C. 2004. Variable retention and other alternative silviculture treatments in the Pacific Northwest. Variable Retention (VR) Forestry Science Forum, Nanaimo, British Columbia, Canada.

Szaro, R.; Peterson, C.E. 2005. Balancing ecosystem values: innovative experiments for sustainably managing forests. 22nd IUFRO world congress: Forests in the Balance: Linking Tradition and Technology. Brisbane, Australia.

White, J. 1993. DEMO: a study of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention in western Oregon and Washington. National Silviculture Conference, Asheville, NC.

White, J. 1994. DEMO: a study of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention in western Oregon and Washington. Regional Alternative Silviculture Council, Blue River, OR.

White, J. 1995. DEMO: a study of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention in western Oregon and Washington. Meeting of Timber Measurements Society, Clackamas, OR.

White, J. 1995. DEMO: a study of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention in western Oregon and Washington. USFS Regional Silviculture Meeting, The Dalles, OR.

White, J.; Couche, D.; Lagoudakis, C.; DeBell, D.; Amaranthus, M. 1993. DEMO: a study of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention in western Oregon and Washington. Forestry for the 21st Century Conference, Portland, OR.

White, J.; Horton, A. 1996. DEMO: a study of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention in western Oregon and southwest Washington. Society of America Foresters Meeting, Hoffstadt Visitor Center, Mount St. Helens, WA.

White, J.; Lagoudakis, C. 1994. DEMO: a study of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention in western Oregon and Washington. Society of American Foresters Meeting, Stevenson, WA.

White, J.; Lagoudakis, C. 1997. DEMO: a study of varying levels and patterns of green-tree retention in western Oregon and Washington. USFS Wildlife/Silviculture Conference, Spokane WA.