USDA Forest Service

Blue Mountains Natural Resources Institute

This research program is no longer active.
Education Links
Information Providers
Managing Disturbance Regimes
Pacific Northwest Research Station
USFS Research & Development
Evaluate Our Service
Your comments and suggestions are very important to our service improvement.

Pacific Northwest Research Station
Blue Mountains National Resources Institute

Forestry and Range Sciences Laboratory
1401 Gekeler Lane
La Grande, OR 97850

United States Forest Service.

BMNRI Home > Publications > Conferences > Seminar Series > Explosion In Slow Motion

Conference Proceedings

Seminar Series

Noxious Weeds: Stemming The Tide

Explosion in Slow Motion

(presented at Stemming the Tide, a BMNRI seminar)

by Jerry Asher, Natural Resource Specialist, Bureau of Land Management, Portland

The first purpose of this presentation is to raise the awareness about rapid spread of these weeds and the impact of them upon our lands. The second purpose is to explain how we can all use the successful wildland fire management thinking process to combat these weeds. There are some identical situations when it comes to managing weeds. Many of us know how to manage fire. Noxious weeds have taken away or severely impaired our ability to manage for healthy rangelands and ecosystems of millions of acres of federal lands in the Northwest. In fact, the weeds continue to expand rapidly. We have an explosion in slow motion underway right now.

The good news is there are many economical and effective measures we can use to control these weeds, and there are many thousands of people who are eager to help us.

There are many fine people who have been attacking these weed problems in the West for some timeBLM, Forest Service, counties, state, highway deptartment, and private landowners. They really deserve a lot of credit and they've had a lot of success.

There is complete and uniform agreement among the university science departments, Agricultural Research Service, Department of Agriculture, experts in the Forest Service and BLM that the weeds are indeed expanding rapidly. There is no criticism intended in the story I will tell. It is my best attempt to explain the situation the way it is.

There are many others who know more about controlling a specific weed than I do, and I recognize that. The goal is to reduce the spread of weeds. I'd like to bring a little reality into the room. I have a bouquet of yellow starthistleit has been microwaved so I'm not spreading viable seeds. We will be seeing pictures of leafy spurgethe worst of worst weeds. Even though it is relatively easy to control in the first couple of years, after that it will send down very deep roots; if the soil profile is deep enough it will go 20 feet below the surface. It sprouts readily from 8 feet below the surface and translocates herbicides poorly; therefore if you get patches of it on a hillside, nobody knows how to get rid of it. The nodules are places where it sprouts and the roots tend to marry up below the surface and really take over the site.

Most of my stories are about federal land in the West, but weeds don't pay any attention to boundaries. Managing for rangeland ecosystem health depends on a wide variety of grasses, forbs, shrubs, and trees. Air, water, and animals are also very important components of the system, but if the vegetative components are functioning properly, those other components will also function properly. Therefore, recognizing the often permanent damage to these plant communities by noxious weeds, these weeds are the single greatest obstacle to managing for rangeland health on much of the western wildlands.

The spread of these weeds began a few centuries ago, but primarily in the late 1800s when people, especially from Eurasia were coming here, and many purposely and accidentally brought plants with them from the home country. Now these weeds were not invasive in the home country, because they evolved over the millenia with the complement of insects, disease pathogens, and competition from other plants. But once brought to this country and released from those controlling factors, they are very aggressive.

Population studies on BLM lands alone showed that in 1985 we had about 2.5 million acres of these weeds, in 1994 about 8.5 million. We know they increase about 14 percent per year. Therefore, by the year 2000 we expect to have between 15 and 20 million acres if we don't increase our weed management efforts. Also, that 14 percent figure tells us they are increasing at about 4,600 acres per day on western federal lands.

So what? These weeds often create monocultures, blocking our ability to manage for biodiversity. Some are poisonous. They are painful and injurious to recreationists. There is loss of livestock and wildlife forage and habitat and increase in erosion. They outcompete rare native plants and reduce adjacent private land value. And they are indicators of and contributors to desertification in eastern Oregon. A 1,300-acre ranch near Klamath Falls, Oregon, is mostly leafy spurge. The ranch was abandoned in 1989, went on the auction block, and sold for less than 10 percent of what it would have otherwise. The following year it was taken off the tax rolls. Severe reductions in livestock forage can occur. Recreation sites are abandoned because of severe infestation. Weeds can outcompete the vegetation wildlife need for survival.

In the 1800s, yellow starthistle found its way from a foreign country into the San Francisco Bay area, spread into northern California and in the last 15 years has spread from I million acres to 10 million acres in northern California. It then spread into southern Oregon along the Klamath River. There is a substantial population south of Mitchell, Oregon, making the surrounding lands at risk of invasion.

At a site a few miles north of Lewiston, Idaho, yellow starthistle was first identified in 1938. The danger was not recognized, and today it infests hundreds of thousands of acres in southern Washington and Idaho blocking our ability to manage for healthy rangelands and biodiversity. In today's technology, on steep slopes it is impractical or not economical to restore those sites. Primarily in the last 8 years, the amount of land in the BLM Cottonwood Resource area that is now infested in yellow starthistle is approaching 30 percent. An explosion in slow motion!

In Nature Conservancy lands, habitat of the rare Calichortis plant, found only in the Hells Canyon Area, is being attacked by yellow starthistle. On the Salmon River, the area manager explained that yellow starthistle has taken away his ability to manage the area of critical environmental concern.

Yellowstar, before it flowers in late June or early July, can be identified in the distance by its green cast. Many of our valuable lands in the lower Salmon and Snake Rivers are becoming infested by yellow starthistle affecting elk range, critical deer winter range, bird hunting, watersheds, and salmon habitat. To the north on the Oregon/Washington border, yellowstar has increased over 100,000 acres in the last 30 years. Yet, it has just begun to infest the hundreds of thousands of acres susceptible, and we are doing little to control it.

Another big problem weed, leafy spurge, is almost impossible to get rid of after the first year or two. There have been a few small patches found on the Grande Ronde River in recent years. It's in BLM land in Klamath County; every time folks go out they find some more. We need to get on top of those small patches. They like to become bigger. In today's technology, it is either impractical or impossible to restore a site once infested with leafy spurge.

Whitetop. We need to find the small patches and control them because they like to become larger patches. In Baker County, whitetop is going up the draws; it was not there 13 years ago on the critical deer winter range near Keating.

Rush skeletonweed was so named because of the almost complete absence of leaves. It was first found in Banks north of Boise in 1954. In 1964 there were 40 acres; today there are over 4 million acres. Baker County has one patch. Union County has one patch. Thanks to the Department of Agriculture, those are under control. Where they are just moving in they are very manageable at that point.

Squarrose knapweed is like other knapweeds except that the seed head is smaller, and it has down-curved bracts like a cockleburr. The seedhead easily breaks off and clings to clothes and animals. Squarrose likes a wide amplitude of growing conditions. Near Tintic Junction, Utah, it was first noticed in 1954. Now it occupies 140,000 acres leapfrogging across the desert. It continued to expand during a drought. It also likes the ponderosa pine type.

Diffuse knapweed is a problem in the wilderness near Prineville. Spotted knapweed has a beautiful purple flower. Montana has over 4 million acres of spotted knapwecd, and it continues to expand there as well as in Idaho, Washington, and Oregon. It was first noticed in Northern Nevada in 1993. Those are a few biocrises in the West.

These weeds really prefer disturbed sites; that's where they get established and grow fastest. Recreation sites, highway right-of-ways, overgrazed areas, mining areas, forestry activity areas; that is where they become established. Healthy communities with desirable vegetation and good husbandry of the land is our first line of defense. However, we need to recognize that as the recent scientific literature describes and my pictures show, they also appear in some of the best lands. We don't know that they are necessarily taking over, but they are certainly moving into some of our best land.

For example, in the heart of the Sellway Bitterroot Wilderness, estimates range up to 40,000 acres of spotted knapweed. There was no livestock grazing there in over 50 years; much of it was never grazed; no logging, no mining. So we have an excellent learning laboratory of what can happen in these conditions.

I found a slope dominated by spotted knapweed above the Selwood River, which has prime salmon habitat. With an infestation like this, you get an increase in sedimentation. It is spreading rapidly there and other places after fire. The Ranger would love to be authorized to send in a crew for 2 or 3 years in a row to search out that spotted knapweed and keep it under control while the native vegetation reestablishes itself. And if he were authorized to do that, it would cost a mere pittance of what is spent to put the fire out.

At the mouth of the Grande Ronde River in 1993, we accidentally found a few yellow starthistle plants, some tall whitetop (the closest are 10 miles away), and one spotted knapweed (the closest 20 miles away). These tiny infestations were controlled, but in 1994 we went back to check and found new populations of rush skeleton weed. The point is, those were found accidentally. We all need to get organized, in agencies and others, so that people are trained to recognize the weeds. There are a lot of eyes out there, and if they just understand, they can report weed sightings so we can control them while they are small.

Figure 1. Purpose: To emphasize the importance of immediate action.

After arrival into an area, weed infestations often remain quite small for a number of years, producing seed but not expanding significantly. Then, when conditions are favorable, exponential growth often occurs. We must minimize the time between introduction and detection so inexpensive and effective control is possible.

Mediterranean sage is expanding rapidly. New weeds are coming all the time. Sulphur cinquefoil can be found near Minam and is on the increase in Oregon. Dalmatian toadflax was found along the Lower John Day River along with diffuse knapweed. Medusahead, once we get a severe infestation of it, is so difficult to get rid of. In areas where it is just beginning to show up, it is quite manageable. Purple loosestrife will devastate the wildlife habitat of our wetter areas. It grows even in areas of Utah and is rampant in wet areas. Some weeds can spread very rapidly. In 1993, Pittsburgh Landing in Hells Canyon was surveyed by weed experts who found no noxious weeds. In 1994 there was a wall of purple loosestrife on that site. We really need to have people trained and alert because these things can happen fast. We need the public trained to help identify them.

The Wilderness Act tells us to manage for the community of life untrammeled by man, and that natural conditions should be preserved. We have two other laws that direct us to destroy noxious plants and to establish and adequately fund an undesirable plants management plan.

First, recognize that most of the public land does not look like the ugly pictures I showed. That was a concentration of the worst I could find to make the point of what can happen and the direction things are going. We have vast areas where weeds are just arriving, and they are easily controlled at this stage. In fact, approximately 95 percent of the public lands are not yet significantly infested. So we can get at managing these lands by using the fire model of prevention, coordination, control, and containment. AlI the tools including herbicides and biological controls are very important and can be used in conjunction with each other depending on the situation. However, preventioneducation, training, and inventory with everyone working together for control of the small outbreakscomes first because it is the cheapest, easiest, and most effective. However, therein is the greatest challenge: to get enough of the key people, landowners, and agencies, to put that kind of energy and effort up front before it's too late.

The curve (fig. 1) illustrates that by the time lots of people recognize the problem, it has expanded beyond the stage where it can be easily controlled. There is only about 5 percent of the public land at the top of the curve where the weeds are widespread. But guess where we spend most of our effort. It is good that we are attempting to control the seed source to protect other lands, but we need a much greater effort at the bottom of the curve to minimize the time between introduction and detection so we can use the cheap and easy techniques to protect the 95 percent of the land not yet severely affected.

Another big reason why we need to operate at the bottom of the curve is that if we let the weeds get to the top of the curve, we are going to need lots of herbicides and biological control agents, which are commonly either not practical, not effective, or not available.

There are people who are encouraging us to do that. "When concern rises, the battle is lost," says Tommy Gooch, Idaho Falls BLM District.

We can use the presuppression and initial attack fire model to think about it: prevention, training, detection, and initial attack. In prevention, we can train employees, educate the public, teach school children, and review our authorized activities. In detection, we can do aerial surveillance, use global positioning mapping, and ask employees and the public to report weeds and recognize the importance. Initial attack includes spotting infestations and giving priority to controlling small spots quickly, and rechecking infestations repeatedly for control.

We need to inventory, because if we are to fight the enemy we need to know where it is. With a trained eye and binoculars, one can spot patches over large areas.

Weeds are spread by vehicles, wildlife, livestock, pantlegs, wind, water, and equipment. Knowing that, we can undertake various management activities: quarantine hay, remove weeds from gravel pits before distributing gravel, clean weeds from entrances to wilderness areas, train and ask recreation workers to control weeds along with their other duties, train managers who work routinely in the field to recognize and report or control weeds (BLM alone has 5,000 field-going employees), cordon off weeds in fire camp so they aren't spread by firefighters, ask "adopt-a-highway" groups to identify and report or control weeds.

Control includes hand-pulling with some species, herbicides, and continued monitoring. On some sites it also helps to replace removed weeds with desirable species. In canyon areas, some folks are using mules and a hand wand to apply herbicides selectively. Where there is a will, there is a way.

Of course we need to work together, and an outstanding guide is the Guidelines for Coordinated Management of Noxious Weeds in the Greater Yellowstone Area produced by BLM, USDA Forest Service, and Park Service. It describes detailed steps for coordination among federal agencies, counties, and the states.

Who is responsible in the public agencies? Everyone. All activities spread weeds and all activities should share in funding weed control.

For a cooperative effort to be successful it takes somebody to step forward and be the catalyst.

The Tri-County Weed Management Area has just formed in Union, Wallowa, and Baker Counties. There are two other proposed Demonstration Weed Management Areas in the Northwest. The Idaho-Oregon-Washington area surrounding the Snake River includes Forest Service, private, BLM, and Nature Conservancy areas. The need is there because that area has outstanding resource values, and the weeds are moving in: skeletonweed, yellow starthistle, leafy spurge, purple loosestrife, and spotted knapweed. Another demonstration area is proposed for the John Day River System. So far they are only ink on paper, and we hope they will be implemented.

You may be feeling overwhelmed; it is a big topic to consider all weeds everywhere. On a local watershed basis, working cooperatively, reaching weed management goals can be rewarding and reasonable.

If we can stop fires, surely we can spend as much energy stopping weeds. Nature often helps us put out firesit doesn't help us put out the weeds. Fires are often helpfulweeds are never helpful. Negative effects from fire are usually short term; negative effects from weeds are long term. So if we are to invest in avoiding permanent damage to our lands, weed management deserves just as much, if not more, attention as stopping fires.

For about 5 to 10 percent of what we wisely spend each year just getting ready for fire, we could stop the spread of most of the weeds on most of the places we want to.

In conclusion, we need to move rapidly and cooperatively to reduce the spread of weeds.

To get involved, contact the Pacific Northwest Exotic Pest Plant Council, c/o Lou Whiteaker, 2795 Anderson Ave, #25, Klamath Falls, OR 97603.

Characteristics of Noxious Weeds: The Ultimate Biological Pollutant:

  • Native plant communities are often permanently changed.
  • Many wildlife species are adversely affected both directly and indirectly.
  • The appearance can be deceivingly attractive and desirable.
  • Only a few ounces of the pollutant can regenerate tons of itself in only months.
  • Its spread is predominantly by almost invisible means: seeds.
  • The pollutant is spread by wildlife, livestock, recreationists, wind, water, vehicles, and other equipment.
  • The initial contamination and propagation are inconspicuous, noticed only by experts.
  • Increased erosion, increased fire hazard, and reduced water quality are a direct result of infestations.
  • New varieties continue to arrive.
  • The public is largely unaware of the potential and actual damage attributable to the pollutant.
  • Weeds have the ability to lie dormant and undetected underground for years, then reappear and spread.
  • The manager's ability to manage for biodiversity and ecosystem health is thwarted and often blocked totally.
  • Threatened and endangered plants are especially vulnerable.
  • Contact can be toxic, painful, and injurious to humans.
  • The effects are often not apparent until the spread is already out of control.

Noxious Weeds: Stemming the Tide

The Blue Mountains Natural Resources Institute presented a seminar series on noxious weeds in May of 1995 at Eastern Oregon State College Ed-Net. The broadcast was viewed at Pendleton, John Day, Enterprise, Baker, Ontario, Burns, Heppner, Mitchell, Monument, Halfway, Prineville, Lakeview, and Seneca, Oregon, and Walla Walla, Washington. This special issue of the Natural Resource News includes material presented at the seminars or as submitted by the speakers in written form.

Other sponsors for this series included Bureau of Land Management, The Nature Conservancy, Union County, Umatilla County, Crook County, Morrow County, Ochoco National Forest, Oregon Department of Agriculture, Oregon State University, and Eastern Oregon State College.

US Forest Service - Pacific Northwest Research Station, Blue Mountains National Resources Institute
Last Modified: Monday, 16 December 2013 at 14:18:44 CST

USDA logo which links to the department's national site. Forest Service logo which links to the agency's national site.