|
|
|
class 1 White/Red/JackPine {eastern_white_pine, eastern hemlock}
class 2 Spruce/Fir {balsam fir, northern white cedar}
class 3 Longleaf/Slash_Pine {slash_pine, longleaf_pine}
class 4 Loblolly/Shortleaf {shortleaf_pine, loblolly_pine,
Virginia_pine}
class 5 Oak/Pine {eastern_white_pine, shortleaf_pine,
Virginia_pine, northern_red_oak,southern_red_oak,
loblolly_pine, water_oak, willow_oak,
post_oak, scarlet_oak}
class 6 Oak/Hickory {hickory, bitternut_hickory, pignut_hickory,
shagbark_hickory, mockernut_hickory,
white_oak, scarlet_oak, chestnut_oak,
northern_red_oak, post_oak, black_oak,
sweetgum, tulip_tree}
class 7 Oak/Gum/Cypress {swamp_red_oak, willow_oak, sweetgum,
American_elm, baldcypress, pond_cypress,
red_maple, water_tupelo, swamp_tupelo}
class 8 Elm/Ash/Cottonwood {red_maple, American_elm, black_ash,
white_ash, sycamore, eastern_cottonwood,
willow, black_willow}
class 9 Maple/Beech/Birch {red_maple, sugar_maple, American_beech,
yellow_birch, black_cherry, black_walnut}
class 10 Aspen/Birch {quaking_aspen, bigtooth_aspen, paper_birch}
An additional rule set was needed for the oak/pine forest type, because
it was a sum of many major oaks and pines, yet the class was intended to
reach those with mixtures of at least 50% oak and 25-50% pine species (Merz,
1978). For this, if the above algorithm determined the class to be oak/pine,
the following statements were applied:
* if loblolly/shortleaf (class 4) was greater than oak/hickory
(class 6), then the county would be reclassed from oak/pine to loblolly/shortleaf,
because pine component is >50%;
* if oak/hickory (class 6) was greater than twice that
of loblolly/shortleaf (class 4), then the county would be reclassed from
oak/pine to oak/hickory, because there was likely less than 25% pine component;
* if neither of the above apply, the county remains classed
as oak/pine (class 5).
This is the average forest type map by averaging the IVs for each species for all 5 GCM scenarios and applying the rules above to get the forest type map.
Another map of interest would be the Forest type agreement - which show
how many of the 5 GCMs agree the forest type to be. There are areas of
major confluence as well as disparity among the models.
Merz, R.W., compiler. 1978. Forest Atlas of the Midwest. North
Central Forest
Experiment Station, USDA Forest Service. St. Paul, MN. 48 pp.