FSH 1909.17 - ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL ANALYSIS HANDBOOK 8/85 WO Sec. 38.4, Exhibit 5 Comparison of Social Effects of the Alternatives Alternative A Alternative B Alternative C (High Timber (Low Cost and Amenity (Low Cost, Grazing No-Action Alternative Departure) Emphasis) and Resort) County Seats High population growth Slight increase in Population growth less Similar to No-Action but no major effects population over than No-Action. No Alternative in social outside of communities' No-Action. No major significant effects. effects, except for ability to cope. effects beyond Pineville's growth coping capacity. and some disruption there. West Side Rural Stability, but out- Economic boom and Major negative impacts Negative economic and Areas and migration of young, in-migration for first because of mill closures. community impacts, but Communities and other long-term first 20 years. All aspects of community generally within ability changes. Problems from growth, life impacted. Depression of communities and but prosperity helps and out-migration. Long- families to cope. solve them. Many term effects severe. potential problems in downturn 25 years ahead. East Side Rural Areas Changing nature of Timber activities in- Ranching and forestry Increased stability of and Communities community from ranch- creased, visual disappearing as viable community from revital- ing to retirement. impacts on retirees parts of community. ization of ranching. Conflicts. create conflicts in Retirees becoming dominant Retiree's growth slowed, communities. Ranching group. but their integration community fading. into the community is facilitated. Southern Valley Stabilizing trends Same as No-Action Few direct effects. Major disruption of the Communities after changes and Alternative. Stabilization slowed by community. Large conflicts of the past conflicts and hard times population increase from 20 years. spilling in from neigh- people with very boring areas. different lifestyles and values. Major community conflicts.