NINETEENTH SESSION REPORT
(Villahermosa,
Mexico- 16-20
November 1998)
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
1.
Summary of Recommendations and Requests
2. Introduction
3. Adoption of the Agenda
4. State of Forestry in the Region
a)
Canada
b) United States of America
c) Mexico
5.
Report of the Bureau of Alternates
6. FAO Forestry Strategy and Implications
7. Review of working Group Activities
a)
Forest Genetic Resources
b) Fire Management
c) Forest Insects and Diseases
d) Silviculture
e) Atmospheric Change and Forests
f) Neotropical Migratory Species
g) Forest Products
8)
Technical Items
a)
Application of Criteria and Indicators
for Sustainable Forest Management (SFM)
Field Level (Canada)
c) Forest-related Traditional Knowledge
(Mexico)
d) Forest Resource Assessment and
Monitoring (USA)
9)
Matters of Attention
10) Other Business
11) Business of the Commission
12) Agenda
13)
List of Participants
14)
List of Documents
15)
Printable Version
Back
to Top
|
|
SUMMARY
OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUESTS
Review of working Group Activities (Item 6)
A. Forest Genetic Resources
1.
The Commission recommended that the working group identify
forest genetic activities that could be used to support
the processes of criteria and indicators of sustainable
forest management (para. 41).
B.
Fire Management
2.
The Commission commended the working group for its work
on criteria and indicators, securing funds and recommended
it share its information with other working groups (para.
48).
C.. Forest Insects and Diseases
3.
The Commission recommended that the working group conduct
a survey of capacity in biosystematics in high priority
countries (para. 57).
D.
Silviculture
4.
The Commission recommended closer collaboration with
the Latin America and Caribbean Forestry Commission
on issues of common interest and that FAO facilitate
the exchange of information between the two commissions
(para. 62).
5.
The Commission recommended that a working of burnt-over
area be launched with a view to increase the knowledge
on the physiological and ecological succession of
species (para. 63).e)
Atmospheric Change and Forests
6.
Due to membership turnover and other factors, the group
had not been able to meet on a regular basis. The Commission
noted the importance of continuing activities in this
area and decided to add new members to the group. It
urged the group to name a chairperson as soon as possible
and develop a new program of work for submission to
the BOA (para. 65).
E.
Neotropical Migratory Species
7.
The working group requested the guidance of the Bureau
of Alternates for its future work. in particular with
regard to conservation strategies in the region (para.
70).
F.
Forest Products
8.
As recommended at the 18th session of the NAFC in 1996,
the working group expanded its membership to include a
wider range of technical expertise, in particular with
regard to non-wood forest products. The Commission recommended
that the working group continue to exchange information
and explore the implementation of joint activities with
the FAO Forestry Department's Non-Wood Forest Product
Program (para. 71).
|
|
Technical
Items
Forest-related
Traditional Knowledge
9.
The Commission recommended that working groups consider
incorporating traditional knowledge
in their work program to the greatest extent possible
(para. 85).
Matters
to be Referred to the Attention of the Committee on
Forestry
10.
The Commission recommended that the following matters
be brought to the attention of:
a)
that FAO recognize the critical role forests play
in achieving its goals and give added importance to
the forestry component in its strategic framework.
b) that FAO better integrate activities by emphasizing
the forestry linkages with agriculture, fisheries,
food security and sustainable development and by collaborating
in such cross sectoral issues as water.
c) that FAO increase its support to the NAFC consistent
with that provided to the other regional forestry
commissions.
d) that the FAO Forestry Department support the exchange
of information among the working groups as well as among
the other regional forestry commissions, in particular
the LACFC, including the distribution of reports of
the working groups to the other regional forestry commissions.
e) that FAO continue to emphasize working closely
with research organizations to promote policy decisions
based on good science at the national and international
levels.
f) that FAO look for opportunities to integrate recreation
and urban forestry in its program of work, given that
these issues are becoming increasing
Back
to Top
|
|
INTRODUCTION
1.
The nineteenth session of the North American Forest
Commission (NAFC) was held in Villahermosa, Tabasco
(Mexico) at the kind invitation of the Government of
Mexico, from 16 to 20 November 1998. The session was
attended by 28 participants from the three member countries
of the Commission as well as the Chairman of the Latin
American and Caribbean Forestry Commission and one observer
representing the International Union of Forestry Research
Organizations (IUFRO) and the Centro Agron6mico Tropical
de Investigaci6n y Ensefianza (CATIE). The agenda of
the session is given in Appendix A, the list of participants
in Appendix B and the list of documents submitted for
consideration by the Commission is Appendix C.
2.
Mr. Victor Villalobos, Chairman of the Commission, welcomed
participants to the session on behalf of the NAFC and
Mr. M. Hosny El-Lakany, Assistant Director-General of
the FAD Forestry Department, welcomed participants on
behalf of the Director-General of FAO. Mr. El-Lakany
thanked the Government of Mexico for hosting the session,
recalled the purpose and objectives of the FAO regional
forestry commissions and gave a brief account of the
FAO forestry program. The Mayor of Villahermosa, Ms.
Georgina Trujillo, addressed the session and the Governor
of the State of Tabasco, Mr. Roberto Madrazo Pintado,
formally opened the nineteenth session.
3.
The Minister of Environment, Natural Resources and Fisheries,
H.E. Julia Carabias Lillo, addressed the session on
the third day on environmental issues in Mexico, including
forestry.
Back
to Top
|
|
ADOPTION
OF THE AGENDA (Item 1)
4.
The Commission approved the provisional agenda without
change.
5.
The following were appointed to the Drafting Committee:
Jan
Engert (United States of America)
Rosalie McConnell (Canada)
Oscar Cedeno Sanchez (Mexico)
Yves C. Dube, Secretary of the Commission, assisted
the Drafting Committee.
Back
to Top
|
|
STATE
OF FORESTRY IN THE REGION (Item 2)
a)
Canada
6.
Following the Government of Canada's major review of
programs and services a few years ago, Natural Resources
Canada (NRCan) and the Canadian Forest Service (CFS)
implemented changes to streamline operations. In this
regard, the CFS is continuing to play a leading role
in responding to the challenges ahead by, amongst other
activities, developing tools and methodologies to measure
Canada's progress in sustainably managing its forests.
7.
Canadians endorsed a new national forest strategy, covering
the period 1998-2003. It builds on the 1992-1997 strategy's
accomplishments and on the findings of two independent
evaluations. National Forest Strategy 1998-2003: Sustainable
Forests, a Canadian Commitment sets out 9 strategic
directions, contains 31 objectives and identifies 121
commitments to action. As with the first strategy,
the new one is the result of extensive consultations
across Canada, involving the range of forest interests:
Aboriginals, academics, environmentalists, industry,
governments, labor, private woodlot owners, research
organizations and others.
8.
In response to federal legislation, NRCan developed
and submitted a sustainable development strategy to
Parliament. Entitled Sustainable Development Strategy:
Safeguarding our
Assets,
Securing our Future, the document summarizes key issues
surrounding the sustainable development of natural resources;
states goals and objectives; and puts forward an action
plan for the next three years.
9.
Similarly, after two years of consultations with staff,
clients and stakeholders, the CFS published a document
entitled Strategic Plan: Beyond the Millenium 1998-2003.
It outlines the environmental context in which the CFS
operates, identifies major challenges and outlines six
broad directions.
10.
Another major initiative the CFS is undertaking is the
identification and assessment of its technological requirements
and capabilities. To this end, it is spearheading an
alliance among industry, universities, provincial and
territorial governments, Aboriginal groups and non governmental
organizations to use evolving communication technologies
to exchange forestry data and knowledge.
11.
A National Forest S&T Course of Action was tabled
at the National Forest Congress in May 1998. It identifies
a strategic agenda for the development and use of scientific
and technical knowledge in the forest sector to help
Canada meet its international commitments such as the
implementation of criteria and indicators for sustainable
forest management. The Course of Action has been incorporated
into the national forest strategy and will guide Canada's
forest science community in the coming years to meet
emerging S&T challenges facing the sector.
12.
With regard to criteria and indicators, implementation
is underway of a national set of six criteria and eighty-three
indicators that help define and measure sustainable
forest management in the Canadian context. Reports describing
Canada's ability to measure the forest values that Canadians
want to sustain and enhance were recently published.
In addition, the Canadian Council of Forest Ministers
(CCFM) approved a plan to collect data and information
to report on a core set of 49 indicators in 2000.
13.
In 1996, NRCan and Indian and Northern Affairs Canada
launched the First Nation Forestry Program in partnership
with First Nations. It has four objectives: enhance
the capacity of First Nations to operate and participate
in forest-based businesses; increase First Nations cooperation
and partnership; investigate different mechanisms for
financing First Nations forestry; and improve the capacity
of First Nations to sustainably manage reserve forests.
14.
Also, the CFS is continuing its active involvement in
the international dialogue on forests taking place in
the Intergovernmental Forum on Forests. In this regard,
Canada and Costa Rica announced a joint initiative to
consider possible elements and work toward building
consensus on future international arrangements such
as a legal instrument on forests. This initiative will
provide a neutral forum to facilitate technical discussion
on this topic.
Back
to Top
b)
United States of America
15.
During the last two years, public debate continued on
the management of natural resources in the United States.
There is widespread public support in the United States
for a balanced approach to environmental, social and
economic concerns about the management of forested lands.
There continued to be honest differences of opinion
about these issues, especially regarding timber harvesting
and road building on national forest lands.
16.
The Forest Service natural resource agenda for the 21st
century focuses on four key areas:
Watershed health and restoration
Sustainable forest ecosystem management
Forest Roads
Recreation
17.
Watersheds are vital to ecosystem health. They absorb
rain and recharge underground aquifers and serve as
habitat for thousands of species and dissipate floods
across floodplains.
18.
Healthy watersheds must be protected and degraded watersheds
restored. The Forest Service will focus on: maintenance
and restoration of watershed health as an overriding
priority in land management planning; restoring desirable
plant conditions through ecosystem restoration; preventing
exotic organisms from entering or spreading in the United
States; reconstructing, relocating and decommissioning
roads to help restore degraded watersheds; restoring
degraded riparian areas; conserving and recovering threatened
and endangered species; completing assessments of watershed
conditions; and helping communities restore and maintain
healthy watersheds.
19.
To keep US watersheds healthy and productive, their
status and condition across all ownership's must be
better understood. State and private owners manage more
than two-thirds of the nation's forests. Sustainable
forest management in the United States connects the
health of the land to people and communities, taking
advantage of what each forest owner can offer toward
achieving sustainability.
20.
The Forest Service will encourage all parties interested
in resource management to collaborate in describing
and measuring sustainable forest management. Actions
will be taken to use the criteria and indicators of
sustainable forest management (the Montreal Process)
to report on the health of all forested landscapes in
the United States by the year 2003. The Forest Service
will link performance by Forest Service managers to
the framework of sustainable forest management. It will
also work with communities through community-based planning
and stewardship on a watershed basis, build urban-rural
links to address forest ecosystem health, and expand
information, education and outreach efforts on sustainable
forest management.
21.
Forest roads are an integral part of many rural areas'
transportation system. They help meet recreation demands
on national forests and grasslands and provide economic
opportunities by linking transportation systems. The
benefits of forest roads are many, but so are the impacts.
22.
The Forest Service's new policy on forest roads will
more carefully consider decisions to build new roads;
eliminate old unneeded roads; upgrade and maintain roads
that are important to public access; and develop new
and dependable funding for forest road management.
23.
Forest Service managed lands provide more outdoor recreation
opportunities than anywhere else in the United States.
The Forest Service is committed to providing superior
customer service and ensuring that the rapid growth
of recreation on national forests does not compromise
the long-term health of the land.
24.
The recreation agenda will focus on four key areas:
providing quality recreation settings and experience;
focusing on customer service and satisfaction; reaching
out to communities to develop recreation opportunities;
and strengthening recreation partnerships, at the national,
regional and local level.
Back
to Top
c)
Mexico
25.
In its presentation, Mexico highlighted the following
main themes:
a)
The central objectives of Mexico's forest policy is
to further the sustainable use of its forests, which
permits use and production in an integrated manner
without endangering conservation.
b)
This principle is maintained and reflected in the
Forestry and Soils Program 1995-2000, which established
strategies and line action accordingly.
c)
Also mentioned were actions in natural forests, emphasizing
that 1998 had been the worst fire season in 30 years.
Diverse work was carried out in forest health and
figures of deforestation were reported for the period
1974-1990.
d)
PRODEFOR is a strategy to increase the use of the
forests through subsidies to forest owners. Mexico
is also involved in criteria and indicators for sustainable
forest management and the international model forest
network. Also mentioned were figures for forest land
area in Mexico and the preparation for a forestry
inventory for the year 2000.
e)
Actions were mentioned in the area of commercial plantations,
emphasizing the goal to develop 875 thousand hectares
of commercial plantations through subsidies in the
next 25 years.
f)
The creation of SEMARNAP in 1994 was mentioned, its
organization and budgets. A variety of diverse research
institutions carry out forestry research in Mexico.
g)
With respect to economic aspects of forestry, figures
were given for forests currently under commercial
production, total commercial production potential,
as well as forestry industries established. Also mentioned
were the important but often intangible benefits of
the environment, along with protection of wildlife
and the development of ecotourism.
h)
Mexico has national and state Consultative Councils
which serve as consultant bodies for Mexican society
and the follow-up of the programs of SEMARNAP.
i)
In 1998, El Nino has been a meteorological factor
that has contributed to the risk of fires and hurricanes
in Mexico.
j)
International cooperation includes collaboration with
diverse countries throughout the region, as well as
interactions with international organizations, and
support by FAO of various events.
Back
to Top
|
|
REPORT
OF THE BUREAU OF ALTERNATES (Item 3)
26.
The report of the Bureau of Alternates (BOA) highlighted
activities over the last two years, including its three
inter-sessional meetings and the support it provided
to working groups during the course of their work.
27.
With regard to the inter-sessional meetings, members
used the opportunity to share information on such items
as:
a)
changes taking place within the federal forest services
of each country and the FAO;
b)
the impact of such changes nationally on program and
service delivery; and
c)
the potential implications for future work of the
NAFC.
28.
The BOA also conducted a review of progress in implementing
its medium-term agenda, entitled A Strategic Look Ahead,
adopted at the eighteenth session. It also examined
the proposals for action of the Intergovernmental Panel
on Forests and urged working groups to address items relevant
to their mandates.
29.
As a result of improvements to the NAFC home page on
FAO's Forestry Internet, information is now readily
available worldwide on a range of activities. Additions
include the capability to hyperlink with web sites as
these are established by individual working groups. The
BOA welcomed the USDA Forest Service's initiative of
establishing a regional NAFC home page and noted the
need to harmonize and coordinate efforts with the FAD
Forestry home page.
30.
working groups provided reports to the BOA on their activities,
noting achievements and identifying areas where assistance
would be appreciated. In response to the latter, the
BOA financially supported the participation of specialists
at workshops, the publication of proceedings and the
attendance of resource people at international meetings.
31.
One of the main tasks the BOA will undertake in the
coming year is a review of the mandates, objectives
and activities of each working group with a view to making
recommendations on future work on current and emerging
issues such as watershed restoration, urban forestry
and recreation. An analysis will also be made on how
best to improve communications among working groups and
address cross-cutting issues. To assist with this exercise,
the BOA, in collaboration with the Secretary of the
Commission, will establish a task force to prepare a
report for its consideration.
Back
to Top
|
|
FAO
FORESTRY ACTIVITIES OF INTEREST TO THE REGION, INCLUDING
FOLLOW-UP TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE
EIGHTEENTH SESSION OF THE COMMISSION (Item 4)
32.
The Secretariat presented FAO activities of interest
to the region, including follow-up to the recommendations
of the Commission.
|
|
FAO
FORESTRY STRATEGY AND IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE PROGRAM
OF WORK AND BUDGET (Item 5)
33.
The Secretariat, in presenting FAO's strategic plan
for forestry, recalled the participatory process it
adopted during its formulation and described recent
revisions. This entailed adding three new goals and
eight new strategic directions. The document will be
submitted as part of the FAO Strategic Framework to
the FAO Council in November 1998 and COFO in March 1999.
34.
The Commission commended the FAO Forestry Department
for its efforts in developing its strategic plan for
forestry and its emphasis on emerging issues such as
forest values other than wood products (e.g. water).
The Commission also noted the need for the FAO strategic
plan for forestry to recognize the linkages between
forest fires and unsustainable agriculture as well as
other cross-sectoral linkages relative to sustainable
development.
35.
In response to implementation aspects raised by the
Commission, the Secretariat indicated that the budget
for the Forestry Department was expected to remain at
its present level and that, in future, resources would
be used in a more focused and efficient way as a result
of new forestry goals and strategies.
Back
to Top
|
|
REVIEW
OF working GROUP ACTIVITIES (Item 6)
a)
Forest Genetic Resources
36.
The report of the 1995 Workshop on Genetic Forest Resources
was published. This report represents a valuable contribution
which involves different topics on the genetic conservation,
genetic variation, establishment and management of seed
sources and germo-plasms storage.
37.
The World Directory of Forest Geneticists and Tree Breeders
is being updated in cooperation with the US Department
of Agriculture and IUFRO. The group also launched and
coordinated genetic surveys of several Mexican conifers
such as Picea chiuahuana, Picea martinezii, Picea mexicana,
Pinus ayacahuite and Pinus maximartinezii.
38.
A proposal on "Conservation of Mexican Pinon Pine
Genes, Species and Ecosystems" in light of climate
change was prepared and submitted for funding.
39.
The group held its last meeting from 8 to 10 December
1997 in Merida, Yucatan (Mexico). The next meeting is
scheduled for March 1999 in Merida, in coordination
with the Silviculture working Group.
40.
The Commission noted common activities with other working
groups, in particular the Silviculture working Group and
encouraged the development of more activities in collaboration.
41.
The Commission recommended that the working group identify
forest genetic activities that could be used to support
the processes of criteria and indicators of sustainable
forest management.
42.
The Commission welcomed the USDA Forest Service and
the USDA Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) support
of new collaborative research in the genetics of mahogany
and cedar between the Forest Research Institute of Mexico
(INIFAP), the International Institute of Research in
Agroforestry (ICRAF) regional offices in Mexico, the
Centro Agron6mico Tropical de Investigaci6n y Ensefianza
(CATIE) and the International Institute of Tropical
Forestry in Puerto Rico.
Back
to Top
b)
Fire Management
43.
Fire activity in 1997 in Canada and Mexico was very
low while that in the United States was normal. There
were four fire-related fatalities in the US. In Canada,
the Canadian Committee on Forest Fire Management was
reorganized as an S&T Working Group under the Canadian
Interagency Forest Fire Center. In the United States,
a new Federal Wildland Fire Policy was developed and
five federal fire agencies are now funded through one
budget appropriation.
44.
Fire activity in 1998 in the United States was about
normal except for an extreme situation in Florida. Canada
and Mexico reported all-time record expenditures and
resource use. Tragically, there were 14 fire-related
fatalities in the US and 70 in Mexico. The US provided
substantial technical assistance and financial aid to
Mexico during its worst fire season in this century.
A CL-415 from Quebec saved the lives of 70 fire fighters
that had been trapped by fire.
45.
A three-year joint US/Mexico fire training program has
been established, the development of North American
criteria and indicators for wildland fire has begun,
a US/Mexico cross-border mutual-aid agreement will be
signed, and an agreement to protect emergency frequencies
will be signed.
46.
Mexico and the United States have entered into a cooperative
program on training and technical assistance for the
next three years. With funding from the US Agency for
International Development the program emphasizes training
in several topics, including restoration of burned areas.
47.
The Ministry of Agriculture of Mexico, together with
SEMARNAP, will host in 1999 an international meeting
in Mexico on the causes of fires in agriculture and
their contribution to forest fires.
48.
The Commission recognized the level of cooperation and
support amongst the three member countries during the
difficult fire season in Mexico. It commended the working
group for its work on criteria and indicators, securing
funds and recommended it share its information with
other working groups. The Commission also noted Canada's
interest in supporting the establishment of a forest
fire prediction system in Mexico.
Back
to Top
c)
Forest Insects and Diseases
49.
An exotic pest information system (EPIS), begun three
years ago to provide a comprehensive list of non-native
insects and diseases for North America that are of regulatory
concern, was released on November 12 1998.
50.
A pitch canker risk assessment was completed in 1998
in response to concerns about the loss of Monterey pine
in California and the potential for spread in North
America.
51.
The working group provides technical advice to the Forest
Panel of the North American Plant Protection Organization
(NAPPO). Group members were instrumental in the development
of dunnage standards to reduce the threat of non-native
insects and disease to North American Forests.
52.
Forest Pathology in Mexico, the companion book to Forest
Insects of Mexico is nearing completion. The final funding
need is US$10,000. Anew book entitled Mistletoes of
North American Conifers is well underway, with an expected
publication date in late 1999. Funding needed for this
publication is US$60-80,000.
53.
Technical exchanges included a risk assessment on Radiata
pine logs imports from Mexico and aerial survey assistance
to Mexico. Future assistance to Mexico to address forest
decline in the monarch butterfly habitat will be provided
in 1999.
54.
The working group provided resolutions to the NAFC regarding:
appreciation to NAPPO Forest Panel for pursuing the
dunnage standards; concerns for the increased threat
to North American forests by the Asian long-homed beetle
and other wood boring insects; concerns that aggressive
action to reduce the spread of European and Asian gypsy
moth strains be continued and enhanced; and concerns
about the decline of entomology and pathology capabilities
throughout North America.
55.
The Commission noted the working group's intention to
work closely with working groups dealing with fire management
and atmospheric changes.
56.
The Commission also noted the USDA Forest Service's
publication of forest ecosystem health issues, intended
to inform the general public and encouraged the working
group to consider working on a similar document for
North America.
57.
The Commission also recommended that the working group
conduct a survey of capacity in bio systematics in high
priority countries.
Back
to Top
d)
Silviculture
58.
In 1997, the group held meetings in Merida (Yucatan)
and Veracruz (Veracruz) to discuss pests and diseases
and the impact of tropical forest production on the
environment.
59.
The group finalized the last three monographs (Eucalyptus
grandis, Cedrela odorata, Cecropia peltata), completing
the first volume on the useful trees of tropical North
America.
60.
The production of a manual on tropical tree seeds is
continuing and will include information on 160 native
and naturalized species.
61.
A workshop on forest biology will be organized in the
year 2000 in Merida, Yucatan, in conjunction with the
forest genetic working group and the Society of American
Foresters.
62.
The Commission recommended closer collaboration with
the Latin America and Caribbean Forestry Commission
on issues of common interest and that FAO facilitate
the exchange of information between the two commissions.
63.
The Commission also recommended that a working of burnt-over
area be launched with a view to increase the knowledge
on the physiological and ecological succession of species.
64.
The Commission noted the offer of the representative
from CATIE to participate with INIFAP in the international
meeting on Low Tree Dry Tropical Forests.
Back
to Top
e)
Atmospheric Change and Forests
65.
Due to membership turnover and other factors, the group
had not been able to meet on a regular basis. The Commission
noted the importance of continuing activities in this
area and decided to add new members to the group. It
urged the group to name a chairperson as soon as possible
and develop a new program of work for submission to
the BOA.
Back
to Top
f)
Neotropical Migratory Species
66.
Due to financial constraints, the group has been unable
to meet regularly. Since its last session, in 1994,
changes have occurred in the conservation scene in North
America as a result of activities related to such initiatives
as the Convention on Biodiversity, the North American
Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the establishment of the
Commission on Environmental Cooperation (CEC) and the
inclusion of Mexico in the North American Waterfowl
Management Plan (NAWMP).
67.
The group published a catalogue of shared migratory
species between the three countries and initiated migratory
bird research projects.
68.
The group proposes to:
- organize
two meetings in 1999 to better define the group's
objectives particularly with reference to the North
American Strategy for Bird Conservation;
- identify
the needs and priorities of the group, including opportunities
for the conservation of neotropical migratory species;
- formulate
a plan of action, including project proposals;
- define
financial resources required to support group activities
and seek assistance from the BOA.
69.
The Commission commended the working group for its work
and noted the potential for partnership with many external
organizations, particularly non-governmental organizations
associated with bird and waterfowl conservation in the
three member countries.
70.
The working group requested the guidance of the Bureau
of Alternates for its future work, in particular with
regard to conservation strategies in the region.
Back
to Top
g)
Forest Products
71.
As recommended at the 18th session of the NAFC in 1996,
the working group expanded its membership to include a
wider range of technical expertise, in particular with
regard to non-wood forest products. The Commission recommended
that the working group continue to exchange information
and explore the implementation of joint activities with
the FAO Forestry Department's Non-Wood Forest Product
Program.
72.
A workshop was held in Merida in June 1998 in conjunction
with the Forest Product Society. Perspectives were presented
in the areas of wood product standards, fiber supply,
non wood forest products and forest certification.
73.
The working group will link with the NAFC home pages and
other sites to disseminate its information.
Back
to Top
|
|
TECHNICAL
ITEMS (Item 7)
a)
Applications of criteria and indicators for sustainable
forest management (SFM) at the field level (Canada)
74.
This report presents an independent review of various
sets of criteria and indicators of sustainable forestry.
The review was conducted under the auspices of the Center
for International Forestry Research (CIFOR) by the USDA
Forest Service Institute for Monitoring and Inventory.
The test, sponsored by the Boise National Forest, was
conducted in southwest, Idaho, USA. The focus of the
test was to review the applicability of criteria and
indicators at the forest management unit level.
75.
The sets of criteria and indicators selected for evaluation
during the North American test included:
a)
those that emerged from the CIFOR Phase I synthesis;
b)
CIFOR's basic assessment guide for human well-being;
c)
Canadian Council of Forest Ministers (CCFM) Criteria
and Indicators of Sustainable Forest Management in
Canada (which are similar, but not the same as, the
Montreal Process);
d)
local/regional indicators including the Idaho Forest
Practices Act; and,
e)
the Greater Fundy Ecosystem Guidelines developed for
the Fundy Model Forest.
76.
The group tested 207 indicators in detail and scanned
another 200. Seventy-one of the original 207 criteria
and indicators tested were accepted, or accepted with
revision. Sixty-five of the 207 were rejected because
they were conceptually weak, impossible to use operationally,
or irrelevant to the North American context. Five new
indicators were proposed, of which three were in the
areas of conserving genetic diversity and two in economics.
77.
The application of criteria and indicators is still
in the development phase and there remain considerable
difficulties to their use. Some indicators are well
developed while others are weak. There were also difficulties
integrating indicators across disciplines, despite the
best efforts of the team to work in an interdisciplinary
manner. Although the basic theory of sustainability
that crosses sectoral lines is still lacking, criteria
and indicators have developed to the point where they
can be applied at the forest management unit level.
78.
The Commission, while commending the progress on criteria
and indicators, suggested further field tests to ascertain
their reliability and the cost of gathering data. In
this regard, it noted Mexico's interest in conducting
a field test at the Chihuahua model forest.
79.
The Commission noted the efforts of the USDA Forest
Service to use the extensive research and analysis on
criteria and indicators processes as a basis for establishing
land-based performance standards for forest managers.
Back
to Top
b)
Forest-related Traditional Knowledge (Mexico)
80.
Indigenous people and local communities have been working
with a knowledge base that has enabled them to live
and prosper in the forest in a sustainable manner for
thousands of years. Traditional knowledge is a way of
life, a way of relating to Creation, rather than simply
being an accumulated set of knowledge about the environment.
It is an important tool of the past and holds the key
to resolving problems of the present and future.
81.
Until recently, traditional knowledge has received little
attention from governments, industry and scientists.
Increasingly, its potential to contribute to improving
sustainable forest management is recognized and international
discussions are highlighting the need to resolve complex
issues such as those related to access, land tenure
and the equitable sharing of benefits arising from the
use of traditional knowledge.
82.
In Mexico, there are some sixty ethnic groups, each
with a history and reservoir of knowledge still unknown
to many. Because of rapid changes taking place, mainly
the elderly hold traditional knowledge and this capacity
is declining. Some examples of traditional lifestyles
are found in the way the Seris, the desert people, live
along the coast of Sonora; the way the Mayas in Meso-America
integrated resource management of tropical ecosystems,
and the way the Purepechas, in the state of Michoacan,
support a large population using resources tied to lakes,
forests and land.
83.
In the United States, the contribution of traditional
knowledge to sustainable forest management has increased
since the USDA Forest Service initiated joint activities
with native tribes. A case working of the Hopi Tribe demonstrates
the application of this unique relationship with nature
in collaborative projects with the Forest Service and
other federal agencies. Given that reciprocity is a
principal social concept for the Hopi, as it is with
many American Indian tribes, the Hopi have accepted
many scientific notions and technical land management
strategies, implementing them on their lands on reservations.
Likewise, the Hopi's view of the world as being spiritually
and physically intertwined, with the past still living
and the future connected to the present are important
considerations when making decisions on the stewardship
of ecosystems.
84.
In Canada, many forest regions that, today, are assumed
to be untouched wilderness were actually fully inhabited
landscapes. In recent years, the value of traditional
knowledge is increasingly recognized in a variety of
contexts, including the National Forest Strategy (1998-2003).
The role of Aboriginal traditional knowledge has also
been supported in recent legal and jurisdictional developments
of importance to forest management. For example, a landmark
ruling of the Supreme Court of Canada in the Delgamuukw
case, in December 1997, recognized that the Aboriginal
perspective on land and traditional Aboriginal laws
governing land use are relevant in establishing occupation
for proving Aboriginal title where such title has never
been extinguished. 85. The Commission recommended that
working groups consider incorporating traditional knowledge
in their work program to the greatest extent possible.
Back
to Top
c)
Forest Resource Assessment and Monitoring (USA)
86.
Forest inventory and monitoring is critical to maintaining
the sustainability of forest conditions and assessing
the effects of policies and management practices. Only
by measuring and monitoring over time can the impacts
of actions be tracked and behavior adapted accordingly.
87.
All three NAFC countries are now revising their forest
inventory and monitoring systems. There is a significant
opportunity to collaborate and share information on
approaches, interests and methods; to learn from each
others' experience; and to expand partnerships to make
better use of available resources. There is also an
opportunity to adopt common approaches at some level
in order to create as much consistency as is reasonable
across all three countries to support assessments which
span national boundaries.
88.
In addition, many NAFC working groups deal with inventory
and monitoring-related issues, such as monitoring forest
fire occurrence, insect and disease status, forest health,
atmospheric change, and migratory species. All working
groups would benefit from some integrated consideration
of inventory and monitoring issues.
89.
The Commission supported, in principle, the establishment
of a working group on forest inventory and monitoring
and invited the participants of the Salt Lake City workshop
to submit a proposal to the BOA for consideration.
Back
to Top
MATTERS
TO BE REFERRED TO THE ATTENTION OF THE COMMITTEE ON
FORESTRY
(Item 8)
90.
The Commission recommended that the following matters
be brought to the attention of COFO:
a)
that FAO recognize the critical role forests play
in achieving its goals and give added importance to
the forestry component in its strategic framework.
b) that FAO better integrate activities by emphasizing
the forestry linkages with agriculture, fisheries,
food security and sustainable development and by collaborating
in such cross-sectoral issues as water.
c) that FAO increase its support to the NAFC consistent
with that provided to the other regional forestry
commissions,
d) that the FAO Forestry Department support the exchange
of information among the working groups as well as among
the other regional forestry commissions, in particular
the LACFC, including the distribution of reports of
the working groups to the other regional forestry commissions.
e) that FAO continue to emphasize working closely
with research organizations to promote policy decisions
based on good science at the national and international
levels.
f) that FAO look for opportunities to integrate recreation
and urban forestry in its program of work, given that
these issues are becoming increasingly important.
Back
to Top
|
|
OTHER
BUSINESS (Item 9)
91.
The Commission supported Canada's bid to FAO to host
the next World Forestry Congress in 2003.
92.
The Commission supported the invitation of FAO to report
on the status and progress of national forest programs
(nfps) at the next session of the Inter-governmental
Forum on Forests in May 1999 and each member country
agreed to provide FAO with information in this regard
Back
to Top
|
|
BUSINESS
OF THE COMMISSION (Item 10)
a)
Election of Officers
93.
The following officers were confirmed by the Commission
to hold office during the forthcoming biennium:
Chairperson:
Yvan Hardy (Canada)
First
Vice-Chairperson: Michael Dombeck (USA)
Second
Vice-Chairperson: Victor Villalobos (Mexico)
94.
The Commission designated Gordon Miller as Chairperson
of the Bureau of Alternates.
b)
Date and Place of Next Meeting
95.
Canada invited the Commission to hold its next session
in central or eastern Canada, in the fall of the year
2000. The Commission thanked Canada for its kind invitation.
Back
to Top
|
|
ANNEX
A
AGENDA
1.
Adoption of the Agenda.
2.
State of forestry in the region
Canada
United
States of America
Mexico
3.
Report of the Bureau of Alternates
4.
FAO forestry activities of interest to the region, including
follow-up to the recommendations of the Eighteenth Session
of the Commission
5.
FAO Forestry Strategy and implications for future
Programme of Work and Budget
6.
Review of working Group activities
Forest
Genetic Resources
Fire
Management
Forest
Insects and Diseases
Sivilculture
Atmospheric
Change and Forests
Neotropical
Migratory Species
Forest
Products
7.
Technical Items
Applications
of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest
management (SFM)at
the field level (Canada)
Forest-related Traditional Knowledge (Mexico)
Forest Resource Assessment and Monitoring (USA)
8.
Matters to be referred to the attention of the Committee
on Forestry
9.
Other Business
10.
Business of the Commission
Election
of officers
Date
and place of next meeting
Adoption of meeting
Back
to Top
|
|
Annex
B
LIST
OF PARTICIPANTS - MEMBERS
OF THE COMMISSION
CANADA
Yvan
Hardy
Assistant Deputy Minister
Canadian Forest Service
Natural Resources Canada
580 Booth St., 8th Floor
Ottawa, ON K1A OE4
Tel.: +1613 947 7301
Fax: +1613 947 7395
E-mail: vhardy@nrcqn.gc.ca
|
Gordon
Miller
Director General, Science Branch
Canadian Forest Service
Natural Resources Canada
580 Booth St., 7th Floor
Ottawa, ON K1A OE4
Tel.: +1613 947 8984
Fax: +1613 947 9090
E-mail: gmiller@nrcan.gc.ca
|
Ms.
Rosalie McConnell
Senior Policy Advisor
International Affairs
Canadian Forest Service
Natural Resources Canada
580 Booth St., 8th Floor
Ottawa, ON K1A OE4
Tel.: +1613 947 7379
Fax: +1613 947 9033
E-mail: rmcconne@nrcan.gc.ca |
Albert
Simard
Science Adviser
Canadian Forest Service
Natural Resources Canada
580 Booth St., 7th Floor
Ottawa, ON K1A OE4
Tel.: +1613 947 9023
Fax: +1613 947 9090
E-mail: alsimard@nrcan.gc.ca |
Stephen
Woodley
Forest Ecologist
Parks Canada
25 Eddy Street, Hull
Quebec, ON K1A OM5
Tel: +1 819 994 2446
Fax: +1 819 997 3380
E-mail: Stephen.Woodley@pch.gc.ca
|
|
Back
to Top
|
|
MEXICO
Sra
Julia Carabias Lillo
Secretaria de Medio Ambiente,
Recursos Naturales y Pesca
Periferico Sur No. 4209, Piso 6
Col. Jardines en la Montania
CP 11420 Mexico D.F.
Tel.: +525 628-06-23/24
Fax: +525 628-06-00
|
Victor
M. Villalobos A.
Subsecretario Recursos Naturales
Secretaria de Medio Ambiente,
Recursos Naturales y Pesca
Periferico Sur No. 4209
Col. Jardines en la Montana.
Deleg.Tlalpan
CP 11420 Mexico D.F.
Tel.: +525 628-06-23/24
Fax: +525 628-06-00 Ext.2043/45
E-mail: ecasas@buzon.semamap.gob.mx |
Victor
Sosa Cedillo
Director General Forestal Presidente de la Mesa
de Alternos de la COFAN
Secretaria de Medio Ambiente,
Recursos Naturales y Pesca
Avenida Progreso No. 5
Col. del Carmen, Coyoacin
CP 04100 Mexico D.F.
Tel: +525 554 0625/554 5620
Fax: +525 554 3955
E-mail: Vsosa@buzon.semarpan.gob.mx |
Sra
Laura Lara Granados
Representante de Mexico en el Grupo de
Enlace
SEMARNAP Avenida Progreso
No. 5 Col. del Carmen, Coyoacon
CP 04 100 Mexico D.F.
Tel: +525 658 3112/658 6324
Fax: +525 554 3590
E-mail: Ilfrausto@laneta.apc.org |
Sra
Silvia del Amo Rodriguez
Presidente del Programa de Accion Forestal
Tropical
PROAFT A.C.
Ponente de Tema Tecnico
Avenida Progreso No. 5
Col. del Carmen, Coyoacan
|
Felipe
de J. Jimenez Duran
Presidente del Grupo de Estudio de Manejo de Productos
Forestales
SEMARNAP Avenida Progreso No. 5
Col. del Carmen, Coyoacan
CP 04100 Mexico D.F.
Tel: +525 6585918
E-mail: Bosnat@buzon.semamap.gob.mx |
Oscar
Cedeno Sanchez
Presidente de Grupo de Estudio de
Manejo de Incendios Forestales
SEMARNAP
Avenida Progreso No. 5
Col. del Carmen, Coyoacin
CP 04 100 Mexico D.F.
Tel: +525 5540612
Fax: +525 5547097 |
Aurelio
Fierros Gonzalez
Director de Plantaciones Forestales
SEMARNAP
Avenida Progreso No. 5
Col. del Carmen, Coyoacan
CP 04100 Mexico D.F.
Tel: +525 5540612
Fax: +525 5547097
|
Jesuis
R. Rivas Osuna
Director General de Proyectos Forestales
Desarrollo Forestal, S. A. de C. V.
Rio Caura # 358 Ote.Col.del Valle
Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon
CP.66220
Tel:+(52) (8) 3990807
Fax:+ (52) (8) 3990812
E-mail: jrivas@agrop.com.rnx |
Fernando
Patino Valera
Presidente del Grupo de Estudio de
Silvicultura
Mexico INIFAP-SAGAR
Km 24 Carretera Merida a Motul-Mococha
Yucatan
Tel: +52 (991) 30000
Fax: +52 (991) 30001
E-mail: fpvalera@sureste.com |
Francisco
Rivera Hernandez
SEMARNAP
Paseo de la Sierra 613. Col. Reforma
Villahermosa, Tabasco
Tel: +52(93) 10-14-52/10/14-55
|
Juan
Carlos Gonzales Ozuna
SEMARNAP
Paseo de la Sierra 613. Col. Reforma
Villahermosa, Tabasco
Tel: +52(93) 10-14-52/10/14-55
|
Basilio
Bermejo Velasquez
Presidente del Grupo de Estudio de
Recursos Geneticos Forestales
Km 38.5 Carretera Mexico-Texcoco-DCF
UACH, Chapingo, Edo. de Mexico
Tel: +52 595 42200 Ext. 5061
Fax: +52 595 42723
|
Pablo
Navarro
Subdirector de Evaluaci6n y Manejo
Instituto Nacional de Ecologia.SEMARNAP
Av. Revoluci6n # 1425
Colonia Tlacopac San Angel
Delegacion Alvaro Obregon
CP. 0 1040 Mexico, D.F.
Tel: +525 6243302
Fax: +525 6243588
E-mail: Pnavarro@ine.gob.mx |
Israel
Gomez Torres
Jefe de Programa
Fracc. Jardines de la Montafia
Periferico Sur # 4209
Delegacion TIalpan
Mexico D.F.CP. 14210
Tel: 6280875 al 78
E-mail: Igomez@buzon.semarvap.gob.mx
|
Leydy
Gonzalez Morales
Jefe del Departamento Forestal
SEDAFOP
Prolongaci6n de Paseo Tabasco No. 1504
Tabasco 2000
Villahermosa, Tabasco
CP.86030
Tel:+ 52 93163562
Fax:+52 93163537
|
Osmar
Escobar Burguete
Subdelegado de Recursos Naturales
SEMARNAP
Paseo de la Sierra # 613
Colonia Reforma
Villahermosa, Tabasco
Tel: +52 (93) 52-06-26
Fax: +52 93 10-14-55
E-mail:tab-recnat@buzon.semarnap.gob.mx
|
Sra
Ofelia Bustamante Moreno
Coordinadora de Apoyo Tecnico
SEMARNAP
Avenida Progreso No. 5
Col. del Carmen, Coyoacan
CP 04100 Mexico D.F.
Tel: +525 658-31-12
Fax: +525 658-63-24
|
Jesus
Pereyra Alferes
Jefe de la Unidad Forestal. SEMARNAP
Paseo de la Sierra # 613. Col. Reforma
Villahermosa, Tabasco
Tel: 52 (93) 10-14-52
Fax: 52 93 10-14-55
E-mail:tab-recnat@buzon.semarnap.gob.mx |
Margarito
Contreras Franco
Profesional Ejecutivo de Servicios
Especiales
SEMARNAP
Paseo de la Sierra # 613
Colonia Refonna
Villahermosa, Tabasco
Tel:+52 93 520626
Fax:+ 52 93 101455
E-mail: tab-recnat@buzon.semarnap.gob.mx |
Edgar
R. de la Cruz Segovia
Tecnico de Campo
Prolong. Paseo Tabasco # 1504
Tabasco 2000
Villahermosa, Tabasco
Tel:+ 52 93 163562
Fax:+52 93 163537 |
Sra
Martha Velazquez
Unidad de Politica Internacional
Subsecretaria de Recursos Naturales
SEMARNAP.
Lateral Perif6rico Sur No.4209,
Col.Jardines en la Montana.
Del.Tlalpan
C.P. 11420 Mexico, D.F.
Tel. 525 628-08-77/75
Fax: 525 628 08-77
Email:pol.intera@buzon.semarnap.gob.mx |
Sra
Irma Patricia Meza Rosas
SEMARNAP
Lateral del Periferico Sur No.4209, ler.piso
Col.Jardines en la Montana. Del.Tlalpan
C.P. 11420 Mexico, D.F.
Tel. 525 628-06-23
Fax: 525 628-06-00 Ext.2045
Email: ecasas@buzon.semarnap.gob.mx
|
|
Sra
Rosa Elena Rodriguez Reyes
SEMARNAP
Paseo de la Sierra 613. Col. Reforma,
Villahermosa, Tabasco
Tel: +52(93) 10-14-52/10/14-55 |
Dinnorah
Vazquez Velarde
Direcci6n General Forestal
SEMARNAP
Av.Progreso No.5, Col.del
Carrnen.Coyoacdn
C.P.04100 Mexico, D.F.
Tel.525 554-26-90
Fax: 525 554-39-55
Email: vsosa@buzon.semarnap.gob.mx |
|
Back
to Top
|
|
UNITED
STATES
Michael
Dombeck
Chief, USDA Forest Service
Department of Agriculture
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C. 20090-6090
Tel: +1202 205 1661
Fax: +1202 205 1765
|
Valdis
E. Mezainis
Director, International Programs
USDA Forest Service
Department of Agriculture
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C. 20090-6090
Tel.: +1202 205 1650
Fax: +1202 205 1603
E-mail: v.mezainis@if.arctic.com |
Ms
Ann Bartuska
Director, Forest Health Protection
USDA Forest Service
Department of Agriculture
P.O. Box 96090
Washington, D.C. 20090-6090
Tel.: +1202 205 1592
Fax: +1202 205 1139
E-mail: ann.bartuska/wo@fs.fed.us |
Andrew
Gillespie
Forest Inventory National
Program Leader
USDA Forest Service
P.O. Box 96090
Washington D.C. 20090-6090
Tel: +1202 205 1507
Fax: +1202 205 1551
E-mail: agillesp/wo@fs.fed.us
|
Jan
Engert
Mexico and Brazil Program Coordinator
International Programs
USDA Forest Service
Department of Agriculture
1099 14th St. NW Suite 5500W
Washington, D.C. 20005
Tel.: +1202 273 4752
Fax: +1202 273 4749
E-mail: j.engert@if.arctic.com |
|
Back
to Top
|
|
Representative
of the Latin American and Caribbean Forestry Commission
(LACFC)
|
|
Fidel
Ramos Perera
Vice Minister
Chairman, LACFC
MINAGRI
Habana, Cuba
Tel: +582 818313
Fax: +582 819731
|
|
NON-GOVERNMENTAL
ORGANIZATIONS
|
International
Union of Forestry Research Organizations (IUFRO)
Miguel Caballero Deloya
Jefe. Area de Capacitacion
Programa de Proyeccion Extema
Centro Agronomico Tropical de
Investigacion y Ensenanza (CATIE)
Turrialba 7170
Costa Rica
Tel.: +506 556 6021
Fax: +506 556 0176
E-mail: caballer@catie.ac.cr |
Centro
Agronomico Tropical de Investigaci6n y Ensefianza
(CATIE)
Miguel Caballero Deloya
Jefe. Area de Capacitacion
Programa de Proyecci6n Externa
Centro Agronomico Tropical de
Investigaci6n y Ensenanza (CATIE)
Turrialba 7170
Costa Rica
Tel.: +506 556 6021
Fax: +506 556 0176
E-mail: caballer@catie.ac.cr |
|
HOST
GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT
|
Victor
Sosa Cedillo
Director General Forestal
Presidente de la Mesa de Alternos
de la COFAN
Secretaria de Medio Ambiente,
Recursos Naturales y Pesca
Avenida Progreso No. 5 Col. del Carmen, Coyoacan
CP 04 100 Mexico D.F.
Tel: +525 554 0625/554 5620
Fax: +525 554 3955
E-mail: Vsosa@buzon.semarnap.gob.mx |
Sra
Laura Lara Granados
Representante de Mexico en el
Grupo de Enlace
SEMARNAP
Avenida Progreso No. 5
Col. del Carmen, Coyoacan
CP 04100 Mexico D.F.
Tel: +525 658 3112/658 6324
Fax: +525 554 3590
E-mail: Ilfrausto@laneta.apc.org
|
|
FAO
SECRETARIAT
|
M.
Hosny El-Lakany
Assistant Director-General
Forestry Department FAO
00100 Rome, Italy
Tel.: +39 06 57055879
Fax: +39 06 5705 2151
E-mail: hosny.ellakany@fao.org
|
Augusto
Simoes Lopes Neto
FAO Representative in Mexico
Cerro de Maika No.115,
Lomas de Chapultepec
C.P. 11000 Mexico, D.F.
Tel. 525 520-11-33
Fax: 525 520-57-55
Email: FAO-MEX@field.fao.org
|
Kyran
0. Thelen
Senior Forestry Officer
FAO Regional Office for Latin America
and the Caribbean
Casilla 10095
Santiago, Chile
Tel.: +562 337 2214
Fax: +562 337 2101 E-mail: Kyran.Thelen@fao.org |
Ms
Isabella Pontecorvo
Meetings Assistant
FAO Forestry Department
00 100 Rome, Italy
Tel.: +39 06 5705 6663
Fax: +39 06 5705 2151
E-mail: isabella.vontecorvo@fao.org
|
Yves
C. Dube
Forestry Officer (Planning)
Forestry Policy and Planning Division
FAO Forestry Department
00 100 Rome, Italy
Tel: +39 06 5705 3299
Fax: +39 06 5705 5514
E-mail: yves.dube@fao.org |
|
Back
to Top
|
|
LIST
OF DOCUMENTS
| Agenda
Item |
Code
|
Title |
| 1 |
NAFC/98/1
|
Provisional
Agenda |
| 2 |
NAFC/98/2
|
State
of Forestry in Canada |
| 2 |
NAFC/98/3 |
State
of Forestry in the United States of America |
| 2 |
NAFC/98/4
|
State
of Forestry in Mexico |
| 3 |
NAFC/98/5 |
Report
of the Bureau of Alternates |
| 4 |
NAFC/98/6 |
Review
of FAO regular and field programmes, including follow-up
to the requests and recommendations of the 18th
Session of the Commission |
| 5 |
NAFC/98/7
|
FAOs
strategic plan for forestry |
| 6a |
NAFC/98/8/a
|
Report
of working Group on Forest Genetic Resources |
| 6b |
NAFC/98/8/b
|
Report
of working Group on Fire Management |
| 6c |
NAFC/98/8/c
|
Report
of working Group on Forest Insects and Diseases |
| 6d |
NAFC/98/8/d |
Report
of working Group on Silviculture |
| 6e |
NAFC/98/8/e |
Report
of working Group on Atmospheric Change and Forests |
| 6f |
NAFC/98/8/f
|
Report
of working Group on Neotropical Migratory Species |
| 6g |
NAFC/98/8/g
|
Report
of working Group on Forest Products |
| 7a |
NAFC/98/9
|
Applications
of criteria and indicators for Sustainable Forest
Management (SFM) at the field level (Canada) |
| 7b |
NAFC/98/10
|
Forest-related
traditional knowledge (Mexico) |
| 7c |
NAFC/98/11
|
NAFC
Workshop on Forest Resource Assessments |
|
NAFC/98/INF.1 |
Information
Note |
| NAFC/98/INF.2 |
Provisional
timetable |
| NAFC/98/INF.3 |
List
of documents |
Back
to Top
|
|