North American Test of Criteria and Indicators of Sustainable Forestry
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Why use Criteria and Indicators? Do they have value?
1.2 CIFOR - History of the C&I Testing Project
1.2.1 Criteria and Indicators Testing
1.2.2 Summary of Previous CIFOR Tests
1.3 The North American Test
1.4 Which Sets of Indicators Were Tested
1.5 Support for the Project
1.6 Scale Issues how big is a forest management unit?
2.0 Testing Methodology
2.1 Assessment Team
2,2 Description of Methods
3.0 The Boise Test Site
3.1 Description
3.2 Landowners and Land Management Objectives
3.3 Ecosystem Management in the Boise Study Area
4.0 Results
Table 3. Summary of the results for the testing of individual criteria and indicators.
Table 4. Amalgamation of Criteria and Indicators Appropriate for the North American Test (Includes C&I From All Sets Tested.)
5.0 Discussion
5.1 Ecological C&I -- Strengths and Weaknesses
5.1.1 C&I related to Carbon and Global Climate Change
5.2 Economic C&I -- Strengths and Weaknesses
5.3 Management C&I -- Strengths and Weaknesses
5.4 Social C&I -- Strengths and Weaknesses
6.0 Conclusions
6.1 Recommendations for Further Indicator Development
References
Appendix A
. The Concept of C&I In Sustainable Forestry.
Appendix B
. C&I Sets Evaluated by the Boise Test Team
Center for International Forestry research (CIFOR)
CIFOR BAG (Basic Assessment Guide for Human Well-being)
Canadian Council of Forest Ministers (CCFM)
RULES PERTAINING TO THE IDAHO FOREST PRACTICES ACT
FOREST MANANAGEMENT GUIDELINES TO PROTECT NATIVE BIODIVERITY IN THE FUNDY MODEL FOREST
Appendix C
. List of Acronyms
Appendix D
. List of Definitions
Appendix E
. Form 1
Appendix F
. Form 2
Appendix G
. Agenda for the Initial Workshop
Appendix H
. C&I for Ecological and Social System Sustainability
Appendix I.
Background Information
Appendix J.
Results of Previous CIFOR C&I Tests to Date
Appendix K.
Detailed Criteria and Indicator Evaluations
Appendix L
. Acknowledgments