Index of Species Information

SPECIES:  Vaccinium pallidum


SPECIES: Vaccinium pallidum
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Tirmenstein, D. A. 1991. Vaccinium pallidum. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: []. ABBREVIATION : VACPAL SYNONYMS : Vaccinium vacillans SCS PLANT CODE : VAVA COMMON NAMES : hillside blueberry Blue Ridge blueberry TAXONOMY : The currently preferred scientific name of hillside blueberry is Vaccinium pallidum Ait. [32]. Hillside blueberry hybridizes with many species including Darrow's evergreen blueberry (V.darrowii), sweet hurt's blueberry (V. boreale), small cluster blueberry (V. tenellum), highbush blueberry (V. fuscatum), deerberry (V. stamineum), mayberry (V. elliottii), velvetleaf blueberry (V. myrtilloides), downy blueberry (V. atrococcum), low sweet blueberry (V. angustifolium), V. caesariense, and V. virgatum [14,19,58,60]. Hybrid swarms or complexes involving hillside blueberry, swamp highbush blueberry, and black highbush blueberry have been reported [58]. Some researchers suggest that V. alto-montanum may be a derivative of hillside blueberry hybridization [57,58] or, alternately, an autotetraploid of hillside blueberry [19]. Vander Kloet [61] reported that hillside blueberry may be an ancestor of highbush blueberry (V. corymbosum). Hairy-fruited blueberry (V. hirsutum) may be the product of hillside blueberry-deerberry hybridization [61]. LIFE FORM : Shrub FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : NO-ENTRY


SPECIES: Vaccinium pallidum
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Hillside blueberry grows from Minnesota and southern Ontario to Maine, and southward to the uplands of Georgia, Alabama, and Arkansas [58,61]. It occurs abundantly in the Allegheny Plateau but is primarily local to the west in Illinois, Wisconsin, Kansas, and Oklahoma [8,61]. Hillside blueberry grows throughout the Ozarks, southern Appalachians, and Coastal Plain but is restricted to isolated populations to the north in much of New England [55,58]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES10 White - red - jack pine FRES12 Longleaf - slash pine FRES13 Loblolly - shortleaf pine FRES14 Oak - pine FRES15 Oak - hickory STATES : AL AR CT DE GA IL IN IA KS KY MD MA MI MN ME MO NH NJ NY NC OH OK PA RI SC TN VT VA WV WI ON BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : NO ENTRY KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K095 Great Lakes pine forest K100 Oak - hickory forest K104 Appalachian oak forest K110 Northeastern oak - pine forest K111 Oak - hickory - pine forest K112 Southern mixed forest SAF COVER TYPES : 1 Jack pine 40 Post oak - blackjack oak 44 Chestnut oak 45 Pitch pine 52 White oak - black oak - northern red oak 53 White oak 55 Northern red oak 70 Longleaf pine 71 Longleaf pine - scrub oak 76 Shortleaf pine - oak 81 Loblolly pine 82 Loblolly pine - hardwood 110 Black oak SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : Hillside blueberry is a prominent understory species in oak (Quercus spp.) woodlands, red maple (Acer rubrum) swamps, oak-chestnut (Castanea dentata spp.) woodlands, pine (Pinus spp.)-oak communities, ecotonal white pine (P. strobus) thickets, pitch pine (P. rigida) barrens, and open pine savannas [9,23,61,64]. Numerous evergreen and deciduous overstory dominants grow in association with hillside blueberry. Common associates include northern red oak (Q. rubra), black oak (Q. velutina), white oak (Q. alba), post oak (Q. stellata), chestnut oak (Q. prinus), blackjack oak (Q. marilandica), Virginia pine (P. virginia), shortleaf pine (P. echinata), pitch pine (P. rigida), loblolly pine (P. taeda), longleaf pine (P. palustris), jack pine (P. banksiana), eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis), red maple, and black cherry (Prunus serotina) [23,28,30,37,64]. Understory associates: Hillside blueberry grows as a principal species in higher elevation spirea (Spirea corymbosa) meadows of Virginia [26]. In the southern Appalachians, mountain-laurel (Kalmia latifolia), rhododendron (Rhododendron maximum), yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis), black huckleberry (Gaylussacia bacatta), wintergreen (Gaultheria procumbens), and little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium) typically occur with hillside blueberry [64]. Common associates in oak, oak-pine communities, and the Pine Barrens of New Jersey include black huckleberry, melampyrum (Melampyrum lineare), sweet-fern (Comptonia peregrina), cat greenbriar (Smilax glauca), mountain-laurel, dangleberry (Gaylussacia frondosa), yellow sedge (Carex pensylvanica), and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) [12,18,34]. Sweet-fern, black huckleberry, dangleberry, and low sweet blueberry often grow with hillside blueberry in oak woodlands [31]. In the upper Midwest, sedges (Carex spp.), Dichanthelium depauperatum, and dewberry (Rubus hispidus) are common understory associates [2]. Hillside blueberry grows as a "diagnostic understory species" in certain old-growth post oak-black oak communities of the Piedmont [30]. It is listed as an indicator or codominant in the following community type classification system: Old-growth forests within the Piedmont of South Carolina [30]


SPECIES: Vaccinium pallidum
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE : The wood of hillside blueberry is soft and white but has no known commercial value [53]. IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Browse: The importance of hillside blueberry browse to wild ungulates appears variable. It is reported to have fair forage value in the Ozarks [47] and receives only light year-round use by white-tailed deer in parts of central Pennsylvania [43]. White-tailed deer seldom feed on hillside blueberry browse during the winter in New Jersey, but in parts of Pennsylvania, it may be eaten during the spring and summer [38]. Hillside blueberry has been described as a preferred white-tailed deer food in parts of Virginia [15]. This preference may be due in part to the presence of juicy, flavorful berries. Fruit: Fruit of hillside blueberry is widely used by numerous species of small birds and mammals [53]. In Virginia and presumably elsewhere, berries are readily consumed by the wild turkey [15]. Blueberry (Vaccinium spp.) fruits are eaten by many species of birds including the rufous-sided towhee, northern mockingbird, gray catbird, brown thrasher, American robin, whimbel, herring gull, Canada goose, ruffed grouse, spruce grouse, eastern bluebird, and various tanagers and thrushes [40,59,63]. The black bear, red squirrel, gray fox, red fox, skunks, and chipmunks also feed on blueberry fruit [40,59,61]. PALATABILITY : Palatability of hillside blueberry browse to deer has not been well documented [12]. Several food habit studies suggest that it is of at least fair palatability to deer in many areas. The juicy, sweet fruit is highly palatable to numerous species of birds and mammals [53]. NUTRITIONAL VALUE : Fruit: Hillside blueberry is characterized by a high soluble solid content [3]. Soluble solids average 13.07 percent, with a titratable acidity of 0.67 [3]. Each berry averages 8 calories [63]. Browse: Leaf nutrient content varies according to phenological development. Killingbeck and Costigan [34] reported the following nutrient values: micrograms per cm -2 N P Cu Fe Zn pre-senescent leaves 57.5 5.5 0.05 0.15 0.07 senescent leaves 2.3 0.4 0.002 0.008 0.013 COVER VALUE : The low-statured hillside blueberry presumably provides minimal cover for large mammals. However, plants form good ground cover for a variety of small mammals [53]. Fallen leaves commonly lodge in dense thickets of this shrub increasing its cover value during late fall and winter [53]. VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : Hillside blueberry can retard erosion on steep slopes [53]. Most blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) can be readily propagated by hardwood cuttings or by seed [65]. The weight of 100 seeds averages 0.001 ounce (34 mg) [60]. Propagation techniques have been examined in detail [65]. OTHER USES AND VALUES : Fruit of hillside blueberry is sweet to bland and of "fair quality" [14,58]. Fruit is eaten fresh or used to make pies and jellies [53]. It receives casual use throughout its range but is harvested commercially in northeastern Alabama, northwestern Georgia, western and northwestern Arkansas, and West Virginia [61]. In many areas, quantities of berries are difficult to collect because the fruit ripens over a relatively long period of time [53]. Hillside blueberry has shown promise for use in breeding hardy, early-ripening, fruit-producing cultivars [4,19]. It has shown particular promise for developing commercial blueberries adapted to upland mineral soils [35]. Hillside blueberry is an attractive shrub and is occasionally grown for its ornamental value as well as its fruit [33]. OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Drought resistance: Hillside blueberry is resistant to drought [19,61] but is not as drought tolerant as many other southern blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) [20]. Radiation: Hillside blueberry is resistant to ionizing gamma radiation [10]. Plants sprouted from rhizomes 0.4 inch (1.0 cm) or greater in depth following aerial exposure to 105 R per day. Plants did not sprout after rhizomes were exposed to 65 to 70 R per day [10]. Disease: The shrub is susceptible to "stunt" virus [19]. Timber harvest: Cover of hillside blueberry is reportedly greater in cut stands (20 percent) than in uncut stands (9 percent) [12].


SPECIES: Vaccinium pallidum
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Hillside blueberry is a variable, erect, deciduous shrub that commonly reaches 9 to 21 inches (23-51 cm) in height [14,48,61]. On some sites, plants reach maximum heights of only 3 inches (8 cm), but on extremely favorable sites, individuals may grow to 39 inches (100 cm) [61]. This rhizomatous shrub forms small to extensive colonies [14,61]. The terete to slightly angled twigs are pale green, reddish, yellow, or pale gray [33,48,48,53]. The variable twigs are glabrous to pubescent [58]. Stem morphology has been examined in detail [45]. Smooth, slightly ridged bark is greenish-brown or red [53]. Roots are finely textured [20]. The simple, alternate leaves are variable in both color and morphology [53]. Leaves are ovate, obovate, spatulate, or broadly elliptic and 0.8 to 2.3 inches (2.0-6 cm) in length [48,58]. Margins are entire, minutely serrulate, or ciliate [53,58]. The glabrous upper surface is yellow-green, pale green, or dark blue green, whereas leaves are paler and glaucous to pubescent beneath [25,58,61]. Leaves turn scarlet or crimson in the fall [33]. Cylindric to urceolate-campanulate inflorescences are borne in groups of 4 to 11 on axillary or terminal racemes [25,48,58]. The perfect flowers are pink, greenish-white, or occasionally white [53,61] and average 0.25 inch (6 mm) in length [33]. Floral morphology has been reported in detail [46]. Fruit is a sweet, juicy, globular berry 0.2 to 0.5 inch (4-12 mm) in diameter [25,33,48,58]. Average berry weight has been estimated at approximately 0.01 ounce (0.28 g) [3]. Berries are blue and glaucous to black and shiny [25,61]. White-fruited forms, although rare, have also been reported [33]. Each berry contains 8 to 14 variable, irregular seeds [25,53]. Of this number, approximately four are viable [63]. Viable seeds tend to be brown or reddish-brown [25,53]. The glossy, pitted seeds average 0.04 to 0.06 inch (1-1.6 mm) in length [53]. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Chamaephyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Hillside blueberry can regenerate through seed or by vegetative means. Seed: In some areas, fruit is produced in abundance [33,53], but elsewhere yields are more often small [16]. Vander Kloet and Austin-Smith [63] reported that plants produce fruit "en masse" in the Appalachians and Ozarks but produce fruit sporadically near the Atlantic Coast. Little is known about specific germination requirements. Radicles generally emerge within 13 days, dicotyledons develop within 23 days, and true leaves are produced within 38 days after planting [60]. The seeds of most blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) germinate only on good sites in favorable years. Ballington and others [4] observed only a few surviving hillside blueberry seedlings. Vegetative regeneration: Hillside blueberry spreads by means of rhizome expansion to form extensive colonies [43,61]. Plants sprout readily from underground rhizomes after aboveground vegetation is damaged or destroyed. Most rhizomes are concentrated in the top 1.9 inches (5 cm) of the A horizon of the soil, but some extend to depths of 6 inches (15 cm) [10]. Buds nearest the stem apex typically sprout first after disturbance [10]. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Hillside blueberry grows on dry, rocky hillsides, upland ridges, rocky outcrops and ledges, sandy knolls, and in shale barrens [14,58,61,53]. It commonly occurs on a variety of disturbed sites, such as abandoned pastures and farmlands, along roadsides, and in clearcuts [14,44,58,61]. Hillside blueberry is a common component of dry, open woods but also grows in hardwood swamps [51,61]. It generally occurs below 3,500 feet (1,061 m) in elevation [14]. Soils: Hillside blueberry grows on dry, sandy or gravelly soils, as well as on heavy clay [17,25,30]. It grows well on acidic soils [53]. Parent materials are variable but include chert, granite, gneiss, and schist [25,30]. Climate: Hillside blueberry grows in a humid mesothermal climatic regime [34]. Average annual precipitation amounts have been reported as ranging from 39 to 47 inches (100-120 cm) [6,34,50]. SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : Hillside blueberry is reported to have "ruderale tendencies" [57,58]. It commonly invades disturbed sites, such as abandoned farms and clearcuts [58,61]. In parts of New England, it has become widely established on abandoned pasturelands. Hillside blueberry, black huckleberry, and roundleaf greenbrier (Smilax rotundifolia) have assumed dominance in these relatively stable plant communities [44]. In many areas, it becomes more abundant on plots burned at frequent intervals [27]. Hillside blueberry also grows in several climax communities. It occurs in climax stands in pine-oak communities of New Jersey and in old-growth post oak-black oak communities of the South Carolina Piedmont [30,37]. SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : Flowers generally appear before the leaves are "half grown" [33]. The mean interval between flowering and fruiting is approximately 66 days [24]. Vander Kloet [61] reported a period of 60 days until seed set. Hillside blueberry often ripens over a relatively long period of time [53], although much geographic variation has been observed. In the foothills of the Appalachian and Ozark mountains, populations often fruit synchronously [63]. However, in coastal regions, fruit ripens sporadically [63]. Ballington and others [4] observed peak ripeness in early June, although berries could be harvested from July 12 to July 29. Generalized flowering and fruiting dates are as follows: Location Flowering Fruit ripe Authority VA ---- July - August Uttal 1987 Great Plains April - June July - September Great Plains Flora Flora Assoc. 1986 n-c Great Plains mid-April early July Stephens 1973 NC, SC March - April June - July Radford and others 1964 OH ---- July 16-28 Gorchov 1987 New England May 10 - June 14 ---- Seymour 1985


SPECIES: Vaccinium pallidum
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : Fire is a dominant influence in many Coastal Plain forests in which hillside blueberry occurs [41]. Historic fire intervals have been estimated at approximately 65 years in the Pine Barrens of New Jersey [6]. Fire intervals are estimated at 40 years in oak-pine stands and as frequent as every 8 years in pitch pine stands of New Jersey [6]. Hillside blueberry is well represented in these communities. Although it can survive during fairly long fire-free intervals, this shrub is particularly well adapted to frequent fires. In the New Jersey Pine Barrens, it typically assumes importance under a regime of frequent fires [10,12]. Burning more than once within 5 years can produce increases in the relative abundance of hillside blueberry. Buell and Cantlon [12] observed no "regular trend in cover until burns became more frequent than every 3 years." However, plants may be reduced by annual burning. On annually burned plots, hillside blueberry cover was approximately one-half that of less frequently burned plots [12]. Hillside blueberry is well adapted to fire [10]. It readily regenerates in postfire communities [14] from rhizomes, root crowns, or surviving portions of aerial stems [10]. As with other lowbush blueberries, clones of hillside blueberry are rejuvenated as fire removes decadent material and stimulates sprouting [52]. Birds and mammals may transport some seed from off-site, but establishment is probably limited to good sites in favorable years. POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : Small shrub, adventitious-bud root crown Rhizomatous shrub, rhizome in soil Initial-offsite colonizer (off-site, initial community)


SPECIES: Vaccinium pallidum
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Most aboveground stems are presumably killed by fire. However, buds are resistant to heat damage [10]. Brayton and Woodwell [10] observed a "few" surviving aboveground stems after a "heavy burn" in New York. Underground regenerative structures are generally well protected by overlying layers of soil. Postfire mortality is apparently low. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : NO-ENTRY PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Hillside blueberry sprouts readily after fire [10,14] from underground rhizomes, buds located on the root collar, and buds located on portions of surviving aerial stems [10,42]. Surviving buds located nearest the stem apex generally sprout to produce the new shoots [10]. Plants commonly sprout from underground rhizomes after aboveground foliage is consumed by fire. Sprouts often originate from root collar buds after only light damage [42]. Sprouting ability may be reduced by severe damage or by fires at too frequent intervals [10]. After wildfires in white oak-scarlet oak (Quercus coccinea)-pitch pine forests of New Jersey, shoot elongation of hillside blueberry was reduced by "heavy" as compared to "light" burns. However, greater population increases were noted after "heavy" burns. Comparative values were as follows [10]: stems/ m sq burn 117 light 138 heavy Some seedling establishment may occur as birds and mammals transport seed from off-site. However, seedling establishment in most blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) is generally limited to favorable sites in good years. Recovery of hillside blueberry is typically rapid. By the second year after a prescribed fire in a clearcut jack pine stand in northern lower Michigan, plants exhibited significant increases in cover [1]. Hillside blueberry was considered dominant in both burned and unburned stands [1]. Cover was documented as follows [1,2]: 1979 1980 1981 cover freq. cover freq. cover freq. mature jack pine stand 27.2 30.0 -- -- -- -- unburned clearcut 11.3 43.3 20.5 44.0 19.2 44.4 burned clearcut 14.3 34.2 9.0 41.0 19.4 43.9 Although hillside blueberry generally increases after fire, small reductions have been noted on certain sites. Ten to 26 months after a burn in north-central New York, Swan [54] reported average frequencies on unburned plots of 47 percent, whereas the average frequency on burned plots was 36 percent. Similarly, Brown [11] observed relative densities of 37.58 percent on burned sites and 43.92 percent on unburned sites in Rhode Island woodlands. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : The following Research Project Summaries provide information on prescribed fire and postfire response of plant community species, including lowbush blueberry, that was not available when this species review was written: FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Prescribed fire: Clones of lowbush blueberries such as hillside blueberry persist for years on undisturbed sites. However, fruit production and overall vigor typically decline with age [52]. Fire has been widely used to rejuvenate decadent clones and improve wildlife habitat [52]. Biomass: Estimates of hillside blueberry biomass in New Jersey Pine Barrens were as follows [6]: (kg/ha) control wildfire wildfire pres. burn pres. burn ---- + 1 162 35 Environmental consideration: Hillside blueberry is able to persist in chestnut-oak woodlands of Pennsylvania adjacent to zinc smelters [31]. Studies in these contaminated communities indicated that many species, normally favored by fire, were weakened by exposure to high soil levels of zinc and did not assume prominence on burned sites. However, hillside blueberry, although also weakened by exposure to soil contaminants, nevertheless increased on burned plots. Percent cover was as follows [31]: burned unburned (sampled 14-15 years after fire) control 7.8 1.2 smelter site 4.7 0.9


SPECIES: Vaccinium pallidum
REFERENCES : 1. Abrams, Marc D.; Dickmann, Donald I. 1982. Early revegetation of clear-cut and burned jack pine sites in northern lower Michigan. Canadian Journal of Botany. 60: 946-954. [7238] 2. Abrams, Marc D.; Dickmann, Donald I. 1984. Floristic composition before and after prescribed fire on a jack pine clear-cut site in northern lower Michigan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 14: 746-749. [7236] 3. Ballington, J. R.; Ballinger, W. E.; Swallow, W. H.; [and others]. 1984. Fruit quality characterization of 11 Vaccinium species. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 109(5): 684-689. [10725] 4. Ballington, J. R.; Ballinger, W. E.; Mainland, C. M.; [and others]. 1984. Ripening period of Vaccinium species in southeastern North Carolina. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 109(3): 392-396. [10724] 5. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434] 6. Boerner, Ralph E. J. 1981. Forest structure dynamics following wildfire and prescribed burning in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. American Midland Naturalist. 105(2): 321-333. [8649] 7. Bramble, W. C.; Goddard, M. K. 1943. Seasonal browsing of woody plants by white-tailed deer in the bear oak forest type. Journal of Forestry. 41(7): 471-475. [3298] 8. Braun, E. Lucy. 1936. Forests of the Illinoian till plain of southwestern Ohio. Ecological Monographs. 6(1): 91-149. [8379] 9. Braun, E. Lucy. 1942. Forests of the Cumberland Mountains. Ecological Monographs. 12(4): 413-447. [9258] 10. Brayton, R. D.; Woodwell, G. M. 1966. Effects of ionizing radiation and fire on Gaylussacia baccata and Vaccinium vacillans. American Journal of Botany. 53(8): 816-820. [9074] 11. Brown, James H., Jr. 1960. The role of fire in altering the species composition of forests in Rhode Island. Ecology. 41(2): 310-316. [5935] 12. Buell, Murray F.; Cantlon, John E. 1953. Effects of prescribed burning on ground cover in the New Jersey pine region. Ecology. 34: 520-528. [9262] 13. Camp, W. H. 1942. On the structure of populations in the genus Vaccinium. Brittonia. 4(2): 189-204. [9512] 14. Camp, W. H. 1945. The North American blueberries with notes on other groups of Vacciniaceae. Brittonia. 5(3): 203-275. [9515] 15. Carlile, D. W.; Tipton, A. R.; Whelan, J. B.; Sharik, T. L. 1978. Changes in prod. of food for white-tailed deer & wild turkey following a forest thinning operation in the Ridge & Valley Prnd province of VA. Virginia Journal of Science. 29(2): 58. [10119] 16. Chandler, F. B.; Hyland, Fay. 1941. Botanical and economic distribution of Vaccinium L. in Maine. Proceedings of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 38: 430-433. [9665] 17. Chapman, William K.; Bessette, Alan E. 1990. Trees and shrubs of the Adirondacks. Utica, NY: North Country Books, Inc. 131 p. [12766] 18. Collins, Scott L.; Good, Ralph E. 1986. Canopy-ground layer relationships of oak-pine forests in the New Jersey Pine Barrens. American Midland Naturalist. 117(2): 280-288. [8636] 19. Darrow, George M. 1960. Blueberry breeding, past, present, future. American Horticultural Magazine. 39(1): 14-33. [9126] 20. Erb, W. Alan; Draper, Arlen D.; Swartz, Harry J. 1988. Screening interspecific blueberry seedling populations for drought resistance. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 113(4): 599-604. [11420] 21. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905] 22. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998] 23. Golden, Michael S. 1979. Forest vegetation of the lower Alabama Piedmont. Ecology. 60(4): 770-782. [9643] 24. Gorchov, David L. 1987. Sequence of fruit ripening in bird-dispersed plants: consistency among years. Ecology. 68(1): 223-225. [3395] 25. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603] 26. Hall, Christine N.; Kuss, Fred R. 1989. Vegetation alteration along trails in Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Biological Conservation. 48: 211-227. [9306] 27. Hall, I. V. 1955. Floristic changes following the cutting and burning of a woodlot for blueberry production. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Science. 35: 143-152. [9012] 28. Hemond, Harold F.; Niering, William A.; Goodwin, Richard H. 1983. Two decades of vegetation change in the Connecticut Arboretum Natural Area. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 110(2): 184-194. [9045] 29. Johnson, Leo J.; Law, Jay R. 1989. A five year record of change for a declining scarlet oak stand in the Missouri Ozarks. In: Rink, George; Budelsky, Carl A., eds. Proceedings, 7th central hardwood conference; 1989 March 5-8; Carbondale, IL. Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-132. St. Paul, MN: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, North Central Forest Experiment Station: 103-107. [9373] 30. Jones, Steven M. 1988. Old-growth forests within the Piedmont of South Carolina. Natural Areas Journal. 8(1): 31-37. [11008] 31. Jordan, Marilyn J. 1975. Effects of zinc smelter emissions and fire on a chestnut-oak woodland. Ecology. 56: 78-91. [3461] 32. Kartesz, John T.; Kartesz, Rosemarie. 1980. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume II: The biota of North America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press; in confederation with Anne H. Lindsey and C. Richie Bell, North Carolina Botanical Garden. 500 p. [6954] 33. Keeler, Harriet L. 1969. Vacciniaceae--huckleberry family. In: Our northern shrubs and how to identify them. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.: 315-342. [9272] 34. Killingbeck, Keith T.; Costigan, Steve A. 1988. Element resorption in a guild of understory shrub species: niche differentiation and resorption thresholds. Oikos. 53: 366-374. [8973] 35. Korcak, Ronald F. 1988. Nutrition of blueberry and other calcifuges. Horticultural Reviews. 10: 183-227. [9612] 36. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384] 37. Little, S.; Moore, E. B. 1949. The ecological role of prescribed burns in the pine-oak forests of southern New Jersey. Ecology. 30(2): 223-233. [11107] 38. Little, Silas; Moorhead, George R.; Somes, Horace A. 1958. Forestry and deer in the Pine Region of New Jersey. Station Pap. No. 109. Upper Darby, PA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. 33 p. [11681] 39. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496] 40. Martin, Alexander C.; Zim, Herbert S.; Nelson, Arnold L. 1951. American wildlife and plants. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc. 500 p. [4021] 41. Matlack, G. R.; Good, R. E. 1989. Plant-scale pattern among herbs and shrubs of a fire-dominated coastal plain forest. Vegetatio. 82: 95-103. [9829] 42. Miller, Melanie. 1976. Shrub sprouting response to fire in a Douglas-fir/western larch ecosystem. Missoula, MT: University of Montana. 124 p. Thesis. [8945] 43. Minore, Don. 1975. Observations on the rhizomes and roots of Vaccinium membranaceum. Res. Note PNW-261. Portland, OR: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station. 5 p. [4879] 44. Niering, William A.; Goodwin, Richard H. 1974. Creation of relatively stable shrublands with herbicides: arresting "succession" on rights-of-way and pastureland. Ecology. 55: 784-795. [8744] 45. Odell, A. E.; Vander Kloet, S. P.; Newell, R. E. 1989. Stem anatomy of Vaccinium section Cyanococcus and related taxa. Canadian Journal of Botany. 67(8): 2328-2334. [8944] 46. Palser, Barbara F. 1961. Studies of floral morphology in the Ericales. V. Organography and vascular anatomy in several United States species of the Vacciniaceae. Botanical Gazette. 123(2): 79-111. [9032] 47. Paulsell, Lee K. 1957. Effects of burning on Ozark hardwood timberlands. Res. Bull. 640. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri, College of Agriculture, Agricultural Experiment Station. 24 p. [11885] 48. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press. 1183 p. [7606] 49. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843] 50. Schier, George A. 1986. Seedling growth and nutrient relationships in a New Jersey Pine Barrens soil treated with "acid rain". Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 16: 136-142. [8631] 51. Seymour, Frank Conkling. 1982. The flora of New England. 2d ed. Phytologia Memoirs 5. Plainfield, NJ: Harold N. Moldenke and Alma L. Moldenke. 611 p. [7604] 52. Sharp, Ward M. 1971. The role of fire in ruffed grouse habitat management. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1970 August 20-21; Fredericton, NB. No. 10. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 47-61. [11120] 53. Stephens, H. A. 1973. Woody plants of the North Central Plains. Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas. 530 p. [3804] 54. Swan, Frederick R., Jr. 1970. Post-fire response of four plant communities in south-central New York state. Ecology. 51(6): 1074-1082. [3446] 55. Uhe, George Jr. 1957. The influence of certain factors on the acidity and sugar content of the Jersey blueberry. Economic Botany. 11(4): 331-343. [9008] 56. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1994. Plants of the U.S.--alphabetical listing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 954 p. [23104] 57. Uttal, Leonard J. 1986. Updating the genus Vaccinium L. (Ericaceae) in West Virginia. Castanea. 51(3): 197-201. [10706] 58. Uttal, Leonard J. 1987. The Genus Vaccinium L. (Ericaceae) in Virginia. Castanea. 52(4): 231-255. [6240] 59. Van Dersal, William R. 1938. Native woody plants of the United States, their erosion-control and wildlife values. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture. 362 p. [4240] 60. Vander Kloet, S. P. 1983. The taxonomy of Vaccinium and cyanococcus: a summation. Canadian Journal of Botany. 61 1: 256-266. [9009] 61. Vander Kloet, S. P. 1988. The genus Vaccinium in North America. Publication 1828. Ottawa: Research Branch, Agriculture Canada. 201 p. [11436] 62. Vander Kloet, S. P. 1983. Seed and seedling characters in Vaccinium Myrtillus. Naturaliste Canadien. 110: 285-292. [10592] 63. Vander Kloet, S. P.; Austin-Smith, P. J. 1986. Energetics, patterns and timing of seed dispersal in Vaccinium section Cyanococcus. American Midland Naturalist. 115: 386-396. [12523] 64. Whittaker, R. H. 1956. Vegetation of the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecological Monographs. 26(1): 1-79. [11108] 65. Crossley, John A. 1974. Vaccinium L. Blueberry. In: Schopmeyer, C. S., ed. Seeds of woody plants in the United States. Agric. Handb. 450. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 840-843. [7774] 66. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090] 67. U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Survey. [n.d.]. NP Flora [Data base]. Davis, CA: U.S. Department of the Interior, National Biological Survey. [23119]

FEIS Home Page