Index of Species Information
SPECIES: Vaccinium arboreum
SPECIES: Vaccinium arboreum
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION :
Tirmenstein, D. A. 1991. Vaccinium arboreum. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ .
SCS PLANT CODE :
COMMON NAMES :
The currently accepted scientific name of tree sparkleberry is Vaccinium
arboreum Marshall . Kartesz and Kartesz  recognize the
Vaccinium arboreum var. arboreum
Vaccinium arboreum var. glaucescens (Greene) Sarg.
Still, many authorities do not delineate varieties of tree sparkleberry.
Tree sparkleberry is the sole North American representative of the
section Batodendron (Nutt.) A. Gray. L. T. within the family Ericaceae
LIFE FORM :
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS :
No special status
OTHER STATUS :
DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE
SPECIES: Vaccinium arboreum
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION :
Tree sparkleberry grows from central Florida westward to central
Oklahoma, southeastern Missouri, southeastern Kansas, and the Edwards
Plateau of Texas [6,22,38]. It extends northward to southern Illinois,
southern Indiana, and Virginia [22,49]. Tree sparkleberry is rare and
local in Kentucky, Virginia, Illinois, and Indiana . Uttal  has
reported that it occurs in parts of Mexico and the West Indies. The
variety glaucescens grows from Louisiana, Texas, and Oklahoma, northward
to Kentucky, Missouri, and Illinois .
FRES12 Longleaf - slash pine
FRES13 Loblolly - shortleaf pine
FRES14 Oak - pine
FRES15 Oak - hickory
AL AR FL GA IL IN KS KY LA MS
MO NC OK SC TN TX VA MEXICO
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS :
KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS :
K074 Bluestem prairie
K082 Mosaic of K074 and K100
K084 Cross Timbers
K090 Live oak - sea oats
K091 Cypress savanna
K100 Oak - hickory forest
K111 Oak - hickory - pine forest
K112 Southern mixed forest
K113 Southern floodplain forest
K115 Sand pine scrub
K116 Subtropical pine forest
SAF COVER TYPES :
23 Eastern hemlock
40 Post oak - blackjack oak
51 White pine - chestnut oak
53 White oak
69 Sand pine
70 Longleaf pine
71 Longleaf pine - scrub oak
73 Southern redcedar
75 Shortleaf pine
76 Shortleaf pine - oak
78 Virginia pine - oak
79 Virginia pine
80 Loblolly pine - shortleaf pine
81 Loblolly pine
82 Loblolly pine - hardwood
83 Longleaf pine - slash pine
84 Slash pine
85 Slash pine - hardwood
89 Live oak
91 Swamp chestnut oak - cherrybark oak
92 Sweetgum - willow oak
93 Sugarberry - American elm - green ash
104 Sweetbay - swamp tupelo - redbay
111 South Florida slash pine
SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES :
HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES :
Tree sparkleberry is listed as an indicator in the following community
type classification. Blackjack oak (Quercus marilandica) and hickory
(Carya spp.) codominate these often infertile sites.
Area Classification Authority
e OK, n AR southern pine cts Silker 1971
SPECIES: Vaccinium arboreum
WOOD PRODUCTS VALUE :
The wood of tree sparkleberry is brown to reddish-brown, fine-grained,
tough and hard [38,48,52]. Wood weighs an average of 48 pounds per
cubic foot (112 kg/cu m) . It was formerly used to make various
tool handles and craft items [48,52].
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE :
Browse: White-tailed deer browse tree sparkleberry in many areas
[15,21]. It is considered an important summer deer food in parts of
Georgia . Many species of hares and rabbits also feed on the leaves
and twigs of species within this genus .
Fruit and flowers: A wide variety of birds and mammals readily feed on
the fruit of tree sparkleberry [38,48]. Fruits and flowers provide
spring and summer food for the bobwhite quail . Black bear,
chipmunks, and many species of birds, including the American robin,
ruffed grouse, and tanagers, feed on the fruit of Vacciniums .
Flowers are attractive to various bees .
Tree sparkleberry browse is reportedly of "low to medium" palatability
to white-tailed deer . Berries are palatable to many species of
birds and mammals.
NUTRITIONAL VALUE :
Nutrient content of tree sparkleberry browse varies by season and burn
history of a particular site . Food values are as follows :
Date burn nutrient content (%) at 15% moisture level
sampled history %air dry protein fat fiber N-free ash phos- Ca
(#burns weight extract phoric
spring none 26.4 9.75 3.93 25.46 40.47 5.39 0.23 0.39
spring 1 22.9 13.25 7.85 13.78 47.37 2.75 0.37 0.32
summer none 37.8 6.65 4.45 22.46 48.19 3.24 0.15 0.87
summer 1 32.0 7.50 4.13 17.01 53.52 2.84 0.18 0.52
summer 2 34.6 7.17 -- -- -- -- 0.17 -
summer 3 22.9 11.13 -- -- -- -- 0.32 -
fall none 41.0 6.64 4.66 21.27 48.43 4.00 0.12 1.11
fall 1 45.5 6.29 4.80 20.73 49.75 3.42 0.14 0.79
winter none 48.2 5.31 4.51 26.15 45.60 3.44 0.14 1.01
winter 1 42.9 6.63 4.07 22.19 47.94 4.16 0.20 0.91
winter 2 49.3 5.51 4.07 23.85 48.38 3.18 0.14 0.78
winter 3 44.2 6.35 2.96 21.88 50.44 3.38 0.15 0.61
COVER VALUE :
Stephens  reported that most birds rarely nest in tree sparkleberry
and typically seek out denser vegetation. However, Thackston and others
 noted that shrubby thickets of tree sparkleberry form favored
activity centers for transplanted ruffed grouse in northern Georgia.
VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES :
OTHER USES AND VALUES :
Tree sparkleberry bark was formerly used in tanning leathers .
Extracts obtained from roots were traditionally used to treat diarrhea
. Unlike the fruit of most Vacciniums, the berries of tree
sparkleberry are inedible to humans .
Tree sparkleberry flowers abundantly and is "very ornamental" .
Flowers are a good source of nectar for foraging honey bees . Tree
sparkleberry may have potential value for developing commercial
fruit-producing strains of blueberries . Highbush blueberry
(Vaccinium corymbosum) can be grafted onto the rootstock of tree
sparkleberry. The resulting cultivars are well suited to droughty
upland sites with soils with a relatively high pH .
OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
Fruit production: Fruit production is highly variable in tree
sparkleberry. Yields are generally greater in older burned stands than
in young open stands . Plants in pine plantations may not bear
fruit . [See Fire Management Considerations].
Grazing: Tree sparkleberry apparently decreases in response to heavy
livestock grazing. Cover by grazing intensity was as follows in an
eastern Louisiana study :
light medium heavy
grazed ungrazed grazed ungrazed grazed ungrazed
control control control
.15 .32 .13 .14 .01 .00
Chemical control: Tree sparkleberry is resistant to aerially applied
herbicides . Blueberries (Vaccinium spp.) exhibit variable
susceptibility to herbicides such as 2,4-D, 2,4,5-T, glyphosate,
karbutilate, and picloram .
Drought resistance: Although reportedly resistant to drought ,
plants occasionally succumb during extreme dry periods .
BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SPECIES: Vaccinium arboreum
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS :
Tree sparkleberry grows as a large, much-branched, upright shrub or
small tree [13,34,48]. Individuals may grow as tall plants with rounded
crowns, or as flat-topped shrubs with crooked branches . Shrubby
plants commonly reach only 7 to 10 feet (2-3 m) in height [38,45].
However, on favorable sites, plants may grow to 33 feet (10 m) with a
d.b.h. of up to 14 inches (35 cm) [38,45]. Record trees have been
measured at 64 feet (19 m) in height with circumferences of up to 116
inches (45.9 cm) . Tree sparkleberry is the only member of the
Vaccinium genus to reach tree size . Shrubby plants commonly form
loose thickets .
The outer bark is gray to grayish-brown, thin, and smooth, with narrow
ridges . The slender, rigid twigs are reddish-brown to
reddish-green or gray, and glaucous, glabrous, or glandular-pubescent
[38,44,45]. Stem morphology has been reported in detail . Leaves
of tree sparkleberry are variable in size, shape, and persistence .
Plants tend to be deciduous in the north but evergreen in the southern
part of the species' range [13,48]. The simple, alternate leaves are
coriaceous, glabrous, and lustrous above [38,45]. The lower surface is
glaucous, duller green, and often glandular-pubescent [45,48]. Leaves
are obovate to elliptic, approximately 1 to 3 inches (3-8 cm) in length
with entire or obscurely denticulate margins [44,48].
The showy, white to pinkish flowers of tree sparkleberry grow in
abundance [44,48]. The perfect flowers are borne in leafy-bracted
racemes or panicles that average 0.8 to 2.7 inches (2-7 cm) in length
[13,48]. Inflorescences typically occur on second year growth .
Palser  has examined floral morphology in detail. Fruit is a black,
lustrous, globose berry 0.2 to 0.4 inch (5-9 mm) in diameter [34,45,48].
Berries are sweet but dry, hard, and mealy [2,48]. The fruit typically
persists well into the winter months [44,48]. Each berry contains 8 to
10 stony, shiny, black to golden-brown seeds [2,38,48,52]. The
variously-shaped, deeply pitted seeds average 0.08 inch (2 mm) in length
The variety glaucescens is distinguished by a larger inflorescence and
glaucescent leaves .
RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM :
REGENERATION PROCESSES :
Tree sparkleberry normally fruits after attaining "the height of a large
shrub or tall tree" . Fruit production is apparently somewhat
erratic. In some years fruit production is prolific, but in other
years, plants produce no fruit . Stephens  reported that even
plants that flower in abundance commonly produce only sparse amounts of
fruit. Various birds and mammals serve as dispersal agents. Seedling
establishment presumably occurs when conditions are favorable.
Germination characteristics are unknown.
Although many ericaceous shrubs sprout after aboveground foliage is
damaged or destroyed, sprouting has apparently not been documented in
SITE CHARACTERISTICS :
Tree sparkleberry grows on sand dunes, hammocks, granitic outcrops, dry
sterile hillsides, in rocky woods, abandoned fields, and meadows
[37,38,41,45,49]. It also occurs on a variety of moist sites such as in
wet bottomlands and along creek banks [37,41,45]. Tree sparkleberry is
common throughout much of the Coastal Plain and in the Piedmont .
In the southern Appalachians, plants generally grow below 2,591 feet
(790 m) in elevation .
Tree sparkleberry grows in many plant communities including mixed
swamps, cypress heads or domes, bayheads, and sand hills [19,28,29,30].
It also occurs in many xeric mixed pine-hardwood forests, pine
flatwoods, post oak savanna, and sand-pine scrub [19,37,45]. Common
overstory dominants include longleaf pine (Pinus palustris), loblolly
pine (P. taeda), slash pine (P. elliottii), shortleaf pine (P.
echinata), turkey oak (Quercus laevis), live oak (Q. virginana),
blackjack oak, hickory, black swamp tupelo (Nyssa sylvatica), and
sweetgum (Liquidambar styraciflua) [5,7,9,12,26,36,40]. Toward the
northern portion of its range in Missouri and Illinois, tree
sparkleberry may be an important mid-canopy species in eastern redcedar
(Juniperus virginiana) or eastern redcedar-post oak (Quercus stellata)
Understory associates: Common understory associates in longleaf pine
and longleaf-slash pine communities include deerberry (Vaccinium
stamineum), flameleaf sumac (Rhus copallina), poison-ivy (Toxicodendron
radicans), southern bayberry (Myrica cerifera), bluejack oak (Quercus
incana), gum bumelia (Bumelia languginosa), yaupon (Ilex vomitoria), and
muscadine grape (Vitis rotundifolia) [5,24,39]. Flowering dogwood
(Cornus florida), possumhaw (Ilex decidua), yaupon, saw greenbriar
(Smilax bona-nox), common greenbrier (S. rotundifolia), rusty blackhaw
(Viburnum rufidulum), muscadine grape, and various oaks are common
components of loblolly-shortleaf pine forests [4,7,40]. Other common
associates include hawthorne (Crataegus spp.), common persimmon
(Diospyros virginiana), sweet bay (Magnolia grandiflora), red bay
(Persea borbonia), hackberry (Celtis spp.), water oak (Quercus nigra),
and coast laurel oak (Q. laurifolia) [9,14,37].
SUCCESSIONAL STATUS :
Tree sparkleberry grows in many successional stages in pine-oak-hickory
and evergreen oak-hardwood forests of Florida . It is an important
component of "subclimax" communities in loblolly pine-shortleaf pine
stands  and grows in successional cypress dome and flatwood
communities . Tree sparkleberry invades mesic sites in longleaf
pine-turkey oak sandhill communities of Florida . It also assumes
prominence in some "young" forest-grassland communities of eastern Texas
Tree sparkleberry grows in all successional phases of many pine-hardwood
communities . It occurs as an understory dominant with deerberry,
flameleaf sumac, poison-ivy, southern bayberry, and American
beauty-berry (Callicarpa americana) on "less frequently burned" sites in
longleaf pine-shortleaf pine forests . Where fires occur at frequent
intervals, bluejack oak, post oak, blackjack oak, sweetgum, flowering
dogwood, and loblolly pine are more common .
Tree sparkleberry is a component of seasonally flooded bayheads and
southern mixed hardwood swamps which are considered climax communities
. It also grows in southern mixed hardwood forests which represent
the dominant climax upland vegetation over most of the southeastern
Coastal Plain . Tree sparkleberry occurs in dry, old growth upland
stands with such species as bluejack oak, loblolly pine, longleaf pine,
sweetgum, and gum bumelia .
SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT :
Tree sparkleberry flowers in late spring or summer. Some plants flower
much earlier than others at the same geographic location . Fruit
ripens over a relatively long period , with ovules maturing in
approximately 200 days . Fruit commonly persists into the winter
months . Flowering and fruiting by geographic location is as
Location Flowering Fruiting Authority
SC, NC late April-June Sept.-Oct. Radford and other 1968
FL March-April Aug.-Oct. Ward 1974
(infreq. in Feb., July)
Great Plains May-June Aug.-Sept. Great Plains Flora
c Great Plains late May Sept.-Oct. Stephens 1973
VA April-May June-Nov. Uttal 1987
se U.S. March-July ---- Duncan and Duncan 1988
SPECIES: Vaccinium arboreum
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS :
Tree sparkleberry occurs in many pine flatwood and sand pine scrub
communities that are essentially maintained by fire . During recent
years, fire suppression has contributed to the decline of these
communities . Many of these communities are now being replaced by
southern mixed hardwood forests, bayheads, and swamps . However,
tree sparkleberry also occurs in these communities and often assumes
greater relative prominence in areas with longer fire-free intervals.
In longleaf pine-shortleaf pine communities, tree sparkleberry reaches
greatest abundance on less frequently burned sites .
Individuals on relatively nonflammable microsites, such as in moist
areas or on rocky sites lacking fuels, may be somewhat protected from
the effects of fire. Vegetative regeneration is not known to occur in
this species, but many Vacciniums are capable of sprouting after
aboveground foliage is damaged by fire. Tree sparkleberry presumably
reoccupies a site through bird- and mammal- dispersed seed.
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY :
off-site colonizer; seed carried by animals or water; postfire yr 1&2
SPECIES: Vaccinium arboreum
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT :
Tree sparkleberry can be girdled and killed by fire . Following a
prescribed burn near Nacogdoches, Texas, mortality of important
understory species, including tree sparkleberry, ranged from 11 to 31
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT :
PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE :
The fire response of tree sparkleberry has not been well documented.
Average height was reduced by a winter fire near Nacogdoches, Texas, but
the average number of stems per plant increased . Response was as
winter burn - March 1974 control
1973 1975 1973 1975
avg. ht. (cm) 243 214 288 317
avg. # stems/
plant 1.15 1.69 1.07 1.00
Many ericaceous shrubs sprout from the root crown or rhizomes after
aboveground vegetation is destroyed by fire. The postfire increase in
stems per plant suggests that sprouting may sometimes occur. However,
sprouting in tree sparkleberry has not been discussed in the available
Reestablishment presumably occurs through seedling establishment where
plants are killed by fire. Many birds and mammals transport seed from
adjacent unburned areas.
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE :
FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
Wildlife management: Prescribed fire can be an effective means of
managing tree sparkleberry thickets for wildlife habitat in some areas
. Prescribed fire can promote livestock forage and deer browse 
and may have some potential for increasing fruit production . Deer
utilization of tree sparkleberry before and after a prescribed fire in
Texas was as follows :
1958 1959 1960 1958 1959 1960
(before fire) (after fire)
6 17 11 4 57 18
However, researchers caution that excessive burning for wildlife can
result in loss of overstory and midstory hardwoods .
Prescribed fire: Managers frequently spray herbicides on southern pine
forests and allow 2 years for the release of native bunchgrasses .
Bunchgrass development provides a uniform fuel for subsequent prescribed
fires. Backfires can then be used to kill "low quality" hardwoods such
as tree sparkleberry . However, researchers note that blackjack
oak-hickory-tree sparkleberry associations commonly occur on poor sites
. Limited growth potential on these sites may make prescribed
burning for hardwood control uneconomical .
Nutrient content: Nutrient content of tree sparkleberry browse may be
altered by burning. [See Food Value].
SPECIES: Vaccinium arboreum
1. Abrahamson, Warren G. 1984. Post-fire recovery of Florida Lake Wales
Ridge vegetation. American Journal of Botany. 71(1): 9-21. 
2. Ballinger, W. E.; Maness, E. P.; Ballington, J. R. 1982. Anthocyanins in
ripe fruit of the sparkleberry, Vaccinium arboreum Marsh. Canadian
Journal of Plant Science. 62(3): 683-687. 
3. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
4. Blair, Robert M.; Brunett, Louis E. 1976. Phytosociological changes
after timber harvest in a southern pine ecosystem. Ecology. 57: 18-32.
5. Bridges, Edwin L.; Orzell, Steve L. 1989. Longleaf pine communities of
the west Gulf Coastal Plain. Natural Areas Journal. 9(4): 246-263.
6. Camp, W. H. 1945. The North American blueberries with notes on other
groups of Vacciniaceae. Brittonia. 5(3): 203-275. 
7. Harlow, Richard F.; Bielling, Paul. 1961. Controlled burning studies in
longleaf pine-turkey oak association on the Ocala National Forest.
Proceeding, Annual Conference of Southeastern Association of Game and
Fish. 15: 9-24. 
8. Clary, Warren P. 1979. Grazing and overstory effects on rotationally
burned slash pine plantation ranges. Journal of Range Management. 32(4):
9. Daubenmire, Rexford. 1990. The Magnolia grandiflora-Quercus virginiana
forest of Florida. American Midland Naturalist. 123: 331-347. 
10. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. 
11. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. 
12. Golden, Michael S. 1979. Forest vegetation of the lower Alabama
Piedmont. Ecology. 60(4): 770-782. 
13. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains.
Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. 
14. Hartley, Jeanne J.; Arner, Dale H.; Hartley, Danny R. 1990. Woody plant
succession on disposal areas of the Tennessee-Tombigbee Waterway. In:
Hughes, H. Glenn; Bonnicksen, Thomas M., eds. Restoration '89: the new
management challenge: Proceedings, 1st annual meeting of the Society for
Ecological Restoration; 1989 January 16-20; Oakland, CA. Madison, WI:
The University of Wisconsin Arboretum, Society for Ecological
Restoration: 227-236. 
15. Johnson, A. Sydney; Landers, J. Larry. 1978. Fruit production in slash
pine plantations in Georgia. Journal of Wildlife Management. 42(3):
16. Kartesz, John T.; Kartesz, Rosemarie. 1980. A synonymized checklist of
the vascular flora of the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume
II: The biota of North America. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North
Carolina Press; in confederation with Anne H. Lindsey and C. Richie
Bell, North Carolina Botanical Garden. 500 p. 
17. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. 
18. Kurz, Herman. 1944. Secondary forest succession in the Tallahassee Red
Hills. Proceedings, Florida Academy of Science. 7(1): 59-100. 
19. Laessle, Albert M. 1958. The origin and successional relationship of
sandhill vegetation and sand-pine scrub. Ecological Monographs. 28(4):
20. Hodgkins, Earl J. 1958. Effects of fire on undergrowth vegetation in
upland southern pine forests. Ecology. 39(1): 36-46. 
21. Lay, Daniel W. 1967. Browse palatability and the effects of prescribed
burning in southern pine forests. Journal of Forestry. 65(11): 826-828.
22. Little, Elbert L., Jr. 1979. Checklist of United States trees (native
and naturalized). Agric. Handb. 541. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 375 p. 
23. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession
following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall
Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council
fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No.
14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. 
24. Matos, J. A.; Rudolph, D. C. 1985. The vegetation of the Roy E. Larsen
Sandylands Sanctuary in the Big Thicket of Texas. Castanea. 50(4):
25. May, Dennis M. 1990. Big trees of the midsouth forest survey. Res. Note
SO-359. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Southern Forest Experiment Station. 17 p. 
26. McGinty, Douglas T.; Christy, E. Jennifer. 1977. Turkey oak ecology on a
Georgia sandhill. American Midland Naturalist. 98(2): 487-491. 
27. Monk, Carl D. 1965. Southern mixed hardwood forest of northcentral
Florida. Ecological Monographs. 35: 335-354. 
28. Monk, Carl D. 1966. An ecological study of hardwood swamps in
north-central Florida. Ecology. 47: 649-654. 
29. Monk, Carl D. 1968. Successional and environmental relationships of the
forest vegetation of north central Florida. American Midland Naturalist.
79(2): 441-457. 
30. Monk, Carl D.; Brown, Timothy W. 1965. Ecological consideration of
cypress heads in north-central Florida. American Midland Naturalist. 74:
31. Nelson, Paul; Ladd, Douglas. 1983. Preliminary report on the
identification, distribution and classification of Missouri glades. In:
Kucera, Clair L., ed. Proceedings, 7th North American prairie
conference; 1980 August 4-6; Springfield, MO. Columbia, MO: University
of Missouri: 59-76. 
32. Odell, A. E.; Vander Kloet, S. P.; Newell, R. E. 1989. Stem anatomy of
Vaccinium section Cyanococcus and related taxa. Canadian Journal of
Botany. 67(8): 2328-2334. 
33. Palser, Barbara F. 1961. Studies of floral morphology in the Ericales.
V. Organography and vascular anatomy in several United States species of
the Vacciniaceae. Botanical Gazette. 123(2): 79-111. 
34. Radford, Albert E.; Ahles, Harry E.; Bell, C. Ritchie. 1968. Manual of
the vascular flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of
North Carolina Press. 1183 p. 
35. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. 
36. Silker, T. H. 1971. Prescribed burning for southern pine management. In:
National Meeting American Society of Agricultural Engineering; 1971 June
27 - June 30; Pullman, WA. [Place of publication unknown]. [Publisher
unknown]. 15. 
37. Simpson, Benny J. 1988. A field guide to Texas trees. Austin, TX: Texas
Monthly Press. 372 p. 
38. Stephens, H. A. 1973. Woody plants of the North Central Plains.
Lawrence, KS: The University Press of Kansas. 530 p. 
39. Stewart, Aberdeen, W.; Hurst, George A. 1987. Vegetation in the
longleaf-slash pine forest, Biloxi District, Desoto National Forest,
Mississippi. In: Pearson, Henry A.; Smeins, Fred E.; Thill, Ronald E.,
compilers. Ecological, physical, and socioeconomic relationships within
southern National Forests; 1987 May 26-27; Long Beach, MS. Gen. Tech.
Rep. SO-68. New Orleans, LA: United States Department of Agriculture,
Forest Service, Southern Experiment Station: 149-155. 
40. Stransky, John J.; Halls, Lowell K. 1979. Effect of a winter fire on
fruit yields of woody plants. Journal of Wildlife Management. 43(4):
41. Streng, D. R.; Harcombe, P. A. 1982. Why don't east Texas savannas grow
up to forest?. American Midland Naturalist. 108(2): 278-294. 
42. Thackston, Reginald E.; Hale, Philip E.; Johnson, A. Sydney; Harris,
Michael J. 1982. Chemical composition of mountain-laurel Kalmia leaves
from burned and unburned sites. Journal of Wildlife Management. 46(2):
43. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982.
National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names.
SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. 
44. Uttal, Leonard J. 1987. The Genus Vaccinium L. (Ericaceae) in Virginia.
Castanea. 52(4): 231-255. 
45. Vander Kloet, S. P. 1988. The genus Vaccinium in North America.
Publication 1828. Ottawa: Research Branch, Agriculture Canada. 201 p.
46. Vander Kloet, S. P. 1989. Typification of some North American Vaccinium
species names. Taxon. 38: 129-134. 
47. Veno, Patricia Ann. 1976. Successional relationships of five Florida
plant communities. Ecology. 57: 498-508. 
48. Vines, Robert A. 1960. Trees, shrubs, and woody vines of the Southwest.
Austin, TX: University of Texas Press. 1104 p. 
49. Ward, Daniel B. 1974. Contributions to the flora of Florida - 6,
Vaccinium (Ericaceae). Castanea. 39(3): 191-205. 
50. Fralish, James S.; Jones, Steven M.; O'Dell, R. Kent; Chambers, Jim L.
1978. The effect of soil moisture on site productivity and forest
composition in the Shawnee Hills of southern Illinois. In: Balmer,
William E., ed. Proceedings: Soil moisture...site productivity
symposium; 1977 November 1-3; Myrtle Beach, SC. Atlanta, GA: U.S.
Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Area, State and
Private Forestry: 263-285. 
51. Bovey, Rodney W. 1977. Response of selected woody plants in the United
States to herbicides. Agric. Handb. 493. Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. 101 p. 
52. Duncan, Wilbur H.; Duncan, Marion B. 1988. Trees of the southeastern
United States. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Press. 322 p.
53. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. 
FEIS Home Page