Index of Species Information

SPECIES:  Elymus repens


Introductory

SPECIES: Elymus repens
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION : Snyder, S. A. 1992. Elymus repens. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [].

ABBREVIATION : ELYREP SYNONYMS : Agropyron repens (L.) Beauv. Elytrigia repens (L.) Desv. ex Nevski [4] SCS PLANT CODE : AGRE2 COMMON NAMES : quackgrass couchgrass witchgrass quitchgrass quickgrass chiendent TAXONOMY : The currently accepted scientific name for quackgrass is Elymus repens (L.) Gould (Poaceae) [51]. One variety and six forms have been recognized [18]. Short descriptions will follow each here, rather than in GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS. Form Glume Lemma Rachis E. r. aristatum oblong awned smooth E. r. trichorrhachis oblong blunt hairy E. r. pilosum oblong awned hairy E. r. vaillantianum lanceolate awned smooth E. r. heberhachis lanceolate blunt hairy E. r. setiferum lanceolate awned hairy E. r. var. subulatum lanceolate blunt smooth In the laboratory, quackgrass has been successfully crossed with the following species [2,18]: E. r. x E. arenaurius = Agroelymus adamsii Rousseau E. r. x Pseudoroegneria spicata E. r. x Agropyron cristatum. LIFE FORM : Graminoid FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS : No special status OTHER STATUS : NO-ENTRY

DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE

SPECIES: Elymus repens
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION : Quackgrass is widely distributed across North America: from coast to coast, south to the southwestern border states and north to Alaska [44]. It is also widespread throughout eastern Canada [18]. Because quackgrass does not tolerate long, hot summers it is absent from the Gulf Coast States (except northern Texas) [36]. ECOSYSTEMS : FRES10 White - red - jack pine FRES14 Oak - pine FRES15 Oak - hickory FRES18 Maple - beech - birch FRES19 Aspen - birch FRES29 Sagebrush FRES32 Texas savanna FRES36 Mountain grasslands FRES37 Mountain meadows FRES38 Plains grasslands FRES39 Prairie FRES41 Wet grasslands FRES42 Annual grasslands STATES : AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE HI ID IL IN IA KS KY ME MD MA MI MN MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY NF NS ON PQ BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS : 1 Northern Pacific Border 2 Cascade Mountains 3 Southern Pacific Border 4 Sierra Mountains 5 Columbia Plateau 6 Upper Basin and Range 7 Lower Basin and Range 8 Northern Rocky Mountains 9 Middle Rocky Mountains 10 Wyoming Basin 11 Southern Rocky Mountains 12 Colorado Plateau 13 Rocky Mountain Peidmont 14 Great Plains 15 Black Hills Uplift 16 Upper Missouri Basin and Broken Lands KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS : K055 Sagebrush steppe K056 Wheatgrass - needlegrass shrubsteppe K063 Foothills prairie K064 Grama - needlegrass - wheatgrass K065 Grama - buffalograss K066 Wheatgrass - needlegrass K067 Wheatgrass - bluestem - beedlegrass K068 Wheatgrass - grama - buffalograss K069 Bluestem - grama prairie K074 Bluestem prairie K100 Oak - hickory forest SAF COVER TYPES : 1 Jack pine 15 Red pine 16 Aspen 20 White pine - northern red oak - red maple 21 Eastern white pine 27 Sugar maple 19 Grey birch - red maple 51 White pine - chestnut oak 55 Northern red oak 108 Red maple 208 Whitebark pine SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES : NO-ENTRY HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES : NO-ENTRY

MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS

SPECIES: Elymus repens
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE : Quackgrass provides cover for numerous small rodents, birds, and waterfowl [30,45]. PALATABILITY : Many palatable hybrid crosses of quackgrass and other species have been developed and planted for livestock [2]. Feeding trials in Minnesota showed that a quackgrass biotype was as palatable as alfalfa (Medicago spp.) [37]. In cattle grazing trials in Montana, preference was shown for some clonal lines of a quackgrass-bluebunch wheatgrass (Pseudoroegneria spicata) cross [46]. The degree of use shown by livestock for quackgrass in five western states has been rated as follows [14]: CO MT ND UT WY cattle good good good good good sheep fair fair fair good fair horses good good good good good. NUTRITIONAL VALUE : Quackgrass has been rated fair in energy value and poor in protein value [14]. However, food value studies in Minnesota showed that quackgrass had as much crude protein as alfalfa during May [37]. These authors list concentrations of 10 minerals found in quackgrass in Minnesota. Results of Alaskan studies showed that quackgrass did not contain enough magnesium required for ruminant digestion nor did it have a high mineral content. However, digestibility was 64 percent and greater in three harvest trials [38]. COVER VALUE : The degree to which quackgrass provides cover for wildlife has been rated as follows [14]: MT ND UT small mammals good fair good small nongame birds fair good fair upland game birds good good fair waterfowl good good fair VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES : Quackgrass has been used to revegetate mine tailings in Nova Scotia [48]. A quackgrass/Fairway crested wheatgrass hybrid may be useful for revegetating mine spoils and roadsides [2]. OTHER USES AND VALUES : NO-ENTRY OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Although quackgrass is considered an undesirable weed species it is often crossed with other wheatgrasses (Agropryon spp.) to create hybrids for grazing [2,6]. It can be controlled with chemicals such as glyphosate, dichlobenil, and fauzifop [50]. Sometimes, however, chemicals are not effective. In Wisconsin, 2,4-D applied to quackgrass caused a slight increase in quackgrass cover and no effect on stem density [23]. In Midwestern prairies, mowing and raking significantly reduced quackgrass biomass and prevented flowering the following growing season [13]. Mowing, burning, and chemical application combined may be the best way to eradicate quackgrass [33].

BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS

SPECIES: Elymus repens
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS : Quackgrass is a cool-season, exotic, perennial, rhizomatous graminoid. Its stems are erect, decumbent, and may reach heights of 1 to 3 feet (0.3-1 m) but more commonly grow to 0.25 to 1 inch (0.5-2 cm) high [18,21]. Quackgrass is green to whitish, with hirsute to nonhirsute leaves and awned or nonawned lemmas [18,26]. Rhizomes can grow 23 inches (60 cm) or more from the main shoot before sending out stems [36] and grow as deep as 8 inches (20 cm) [26]. Dahlberg [12] described how to identify seeds of the Agropyron genus to distinguish between desirable and undesirable species. RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM : Chamaephyte Geophyte REGENERATION PROCESSES : Quackgrass propagates mainly by rhizomes but also reproduces by seed. Seed production, however, is reported to be as low as 25 viable seeds per plant per season [36]. Studies in Alaska showed that seed viability may vary depending on how deep and long the seeds have been buried; viablity is reduced significantly after burial for 21 months [10]. In greenhouse trials, dormancy of seeds buried 6 inches (15 cm) deep was 16 percent, while dormancy of seeds buried 0.8 inch (2 cm) deep was only 5 percent [9]. Cross-pollination is necessary for seed production [44]. Dormancy in rhizome buds has been related to nitrogen deficiencies, which peak in June [8]. Sod mats can be as dense as 367 meters of rhizomes per square meter [36]. SITE CHARACTERISTICS : Quackgrass invades gardens, yards, crop fields, roadsides, ditches, and just about any disturbed, moist area [21]. It invades mixed-grass prairies as well as oak (Quercus spp.)-hickory (Carya spp.) and whitebark pine (Pinus albicaulis) forests [1,24,49]. It can tolerate some saline conditions in the low-lying valleys of Utah [26]. Salt-tolerant cultivars have been developed by crossing quackgrass with bluebunch wheatgrass [42]. Elevational range in four western states follows [14]: State Elevation Utah 5,100-8,200 feet (1,554-2,499 m) Colorado 4,800-10,000 feet (1,463-3,048 m) Wyoming 4,500-8,000 feet (1,372-2,438 m) Montana 5,000-6,600 feet (1,524-2,012 m) Some associate species of quackgrass include sedge (Carex spp.), bulrush (Scirpus spp.), rush (Juncus spp.), bluebunch wheatgrass, crested wheatgrass, red top (Agrostis alba), indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans), bluestems (Andropogon spp., Schizachyrium spp.), smooth brome (Bromus inermis), poverty oatgrass (Danthonia spicata), panic grass (Panicum spp.), Kentucky bluegrass (Poa pratensis), common ragweed (Ambrosia artemisiifolia), prairie pepperweed (Lepidium densiflorum), prairie dropseed (Sporobolus heterolepis), Canada thistle (Cirsium arvense), Carolina geranium (Geranium carolinianum), and bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum) [1,5,11,15,24,26,28]. SUCCESSIONAL STATUS : Quackgrass is an early seral dominant in disturbed areas [15,22,27]. SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT : Quackgrass flowers from June through August in Colorado, Wyoming, and Montana; and from June through July in North Dakota [14]. Optimum temperatures for growth are between 68 and 77 degrees Fahrenheit (20 and 25 deg C), with no growth occurring above 95 degrees Fahrenheit (35 deg C) or below 35 degrees Fahrenheit (2 deg C) [16,36]. Primary rhizome growth begins in late May or early June and then again in September and October [36]. Rhizome growth seems to be favored by low temperatures [50 deg F(10 deg C)] and long days (18 hours) [36].

FIRE ECOLOGY

SPECIES: Elymus repens
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS : Quackgrass is adapted to certain seasonal fires because of its rhizomes. POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY : Rhizomatous herb, rhizome in soil

FIRE EFFECTS

SPECIES: Elymus repens
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT : Late spring fires generally reduce quackgrass cover, flowering and biomass, while early spring fires can increase these. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT : A May burn in oak savannas of Wisconsin significantly reduced quackgrass and halted flowering [13]. Similar results (reduction in biomass and cover) have been shown for other areas [23,28]. Burning quackgrass on a biennial schedule for several years has been effective in eradicating this species [1,3]. PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE : Quackgrass cover can increase following fire. DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE : Five annual late April to early May burns in Minnesota resulted in a decrease in quackgrass height but an increase in cover [5]. Plant vigor was reduced and flowering stopped, but quackgrass continued to spread into adjacent areas. At the time of the April burns, plant height was between 3.9 and 5.9 inches (10-15 cm), and during the May burn, heights were between 5.9 and 9.8 inches (15-25 cm). May and June burns on North Dakota grasslands "harmed" quackgrass in the first postburn season, but quackgrass recovered to almost preburn levels by the second postburn season. Following the late June fire, quackgrass showed a slight increase in cover, height, shoot density, production, and flowering [39]. Wisconsin grassland fires in March caused an increase in seed production by July and August [23]. The Research Project Summary, Herbaceous responses to seasonal burning in experimental tallgrass prairie plots provides information on postfire response of quackgrass in experimental prairie plots that was not available when this species review was originally written. FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS : Cool-season grasses such quackgrass are best eliminated with early spring burns [20,31,34]. Cool-season grasses can grow in the fall following summer dormancy; therefore, fall burns might also help reduce undesirable cool-season grasses [41].

References for species: Elymus repens


1. Anderson, Roger C. 1973. The use of fire as a management tool on the Curtis prairie. In: Proceedings, annual Tall Timbers fire ecology conference; 1972 June 8-9; Lubbock, TX. Number 12. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 23-35. [8461]
2. Asay, K. H. 1983. Promising new grasses for range seedings. In: Monsen, Stephen B.; Shaw, Nancy, compilers, Managing Intermountain rangelands--improvement of range and wildlife habitats: Proceedings of symposia; 1981 September 15-17; Twin Falls, ID; 1982 June 22-24; Elko, NV. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-157. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 110-115. [356]
3. Bailey, Arthur W. 1978. Effects of fire on the mixed prairie vegetation. In: Proceedings: Prairie prescribed burning symposium and workshop; 1978 April 25-28; Jamestown, ND. [Place of publication unknown]: [Publisher unknown]: [5 pages]. On file with: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT. [3598]
4. Barkworth, Mary E.; Dewey, Douglas R. 1985. Genomically based genera in the perennial Triticeae of North America: identification and membership. American Journal of Botany. 72(5): 767-776. [393]
5. Becker, Donald A. 1989. Five years of annual prairie burns. In: Bragg, Thomas A.; Stubbendieck, James, eds. Prairie pioneers: ecology, history and culture: Proceedings, 11th North American prairie conference; 1988 August 7-11; Lincoln, NE. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska: 163-168. [14037]
6. Beetle, Alan A. 1955. Wheatgrasses of Wyoming. Bull. 336. Laramie, WY: Wyoming Agricultural Experiment Station. 24 p. [415]
7. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals, reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p. [434]
8. Chancellor, R. J. 1974. The development of dominance amongst shoots arising from fragments of Agropyron repens rhizomes. Weed Research. 14: 29-38. [16858]
9. Conn, Jeffery S. 1990. Seed viability and dormancy of 17 weed species after burial for 4.7 years in Alaska. Weed Science. 38: 134-138. [11815]
10. Conn, Jeffery S.; Farris, Martha L. 1987. Seed viability and dormancy of 17 weed species after 21 months in Alaska. Weed Science. 35: 524-529; 1987. [5]
11. Crow, T. R.; Mroz, G. D.; Gale, M. R. 1991. Regrowth and nutrient accumulations following whole-tree harvesting of a maple-oak forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 21: 1305-1315. [16600]
12. Dahlberg, Robert C. 1914. Identification of the seeds of species of Agropyron. Journal of Agricultural Research. 3(3): 275-289. [4147]
13. Diboll, Neil. 1986. Mowing as an alternative to spring burning for control of cool season exotic grasses in prairie grass plantings. In: Clambey, Gary K.; Pemble, Richard H., eds. The prairie: past, present and future: Proceedings, 9th North American prairie conference; 1984 July 29 - August 1; Moorhead, MN. Fargo, ND: Tri-College University Center for Environmental Studies: 204-209. [3574]
14. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
15. Dziadyk, Bohdan; Clambey, Gary K. 1983. Floristic composition of plant communities in a western Minnesota tallgrass prairie. In: Kucera, Clair L., ed. Proceedings, 7th North American prairie conference; 1980 August 4-6; Springfield, MO. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri: 45-54. [3194]
16. Evans, Raymond A.; Young, James A. 1987. Seedbed microenvironment, seedling recruitment, and plant establishment on rangelands. In: Frasier, Gary W.; Evans, Raymond A., eds. Proceedings of symposium: "Seed and seedbed ecology of rangeland plants"; 1987 April 21-23; Tucson, AZ. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service: 212-220. [3354]
17. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
18. Fernald, Merritt Lyndon. 1950. Gray's manual of botany. [Corrections supplied by R. C. Rollins]. Portland, OR: Dioscorides Press. 1632 p. (Dudley, Theodore R., gen. ed.; Biosystematics, Floristic & Phylogeny Series; vol. 2) [14935]
19. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others]. 1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
20. Glenn-Lewin, David C.; Johnson, Louise A.; Jurik, Thomas W.; [and others]. 1990. Fire in central North American grasslands: vegetative reproduction, seed germination, and seedling establishment. In: Collins, Scott L.; Wallace, Linda L., eds. Fire in North American tallgrass prairies. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press: 28-45. [14194]
21. Great Plains Flora Association. 1986. Flora of the Great Plains. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas. 1392 p. [1603]
22. Gross, Katherine L.; Werner, Patricia A. 1982. Colonizing abilities of "biennial" plant species in relation to ground cover: implications for their distributions in a successional sere. Ecology. 63(4): 921-931. [12143]
23. Halvorsen, Harvey H.; Anderson, Raymond K. 1983. Evaluation of grassland management for wildlife in central Wisconsin. In: Kucera, Clair L., ed. Proceedings, 7th North American prairie conference; 1980 August 4-6; Springfield, MO. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri: 267-279. [3228]
24. Henderson, Richard A. 1986. Response of seedling and sapling trees to a spring fire in a Wisconsin oak opening. In: Koonce, Andrea L., ed. Prescribed burning in the Midwest: state-of-the-art: Proceedings of a symposium; 1986 March 3-6; Stevens Point, WI. Stevens Point, WI: University of Wisconsin, College of Natural Resources, Fire Science Center: 81-85. [16272]
25. Hitchcock, A. S. 1951. Manual of the grasses of the United States. Misc. Publ. No. 200. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Administration. 1051 p. [2nd edition revised by Agnes Chase in two volumes. New York: Dover Publications, Inc.]. [1165]
26. Holmgren, Arthur H. 1958. Weeds of Utah. Special Report 12. Logan, UT: Utah State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. 85 p. [2935]
27. Huang, Chih-Lin; del Moral, Roger. 1988. Plant-environment relationships on the Montlake wildlife area, Seattle, Washington, USA. Vegetatio. 75: 103-113. [9742]
28. Hughes, H. Glenn. 1985. Vegetation responses to spring burning in an improved pasture in central Pennsylvania. In: Long, James N., ed. Fire management: the challenge of protection and use: Proceedings of a symposium; 1985 April 17-19; Logan, UT. [Place of publication unknown]. [Publisher unknown]. 3-9. [3033]
29. Kauffman, J. Boone; Krueger, W. C.; Vavra, M. 1983. Effects of late season cattle grazing on riparian plant communities. Journal of Range Management. 36(6): 685-691. [16965]
30. Kirsch, Leo M.; Higgins, Kenneth F. 1976. Upland sandpiper nesting and management in North Dakota. Wildlife Society Bulletin. 4(1): 16-20. [14949]
31. Kucera, Clair L. 1981. Grasslands and fire. In: Mooney, H. A.; Bonnicksen, T. M.; Christensen, N. L.; [and others], technical coordinators. Fire regimes and ecosystem properties: Proceedings of the conference; 1978 December 11-15; Honolulu, HI. Gen. Tech. Rep. WO-26. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service: 90-111. [4389]
32. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York: American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
33. Liegel, Konrad; Lyon, Jonathon. 1986. Prairie restoration program at the International Crane Foundation. In: Clambey, Gary K.; Pemble, Richard H., eds. The prairie: past, present and future: Proceedings, 9th North American prairie conference; 1984 July 29 - August 1; Moorhead, MN. Fargo, ND: Tri-College University Center for Environmental Studies: 190-194. [3567]
34. Linne, James M. 1978. BLM guidelines for prairie/plains plant communities to incorporate fire use/management into activity plans and fire use plans. In: Fire management: Prairie plant communities: Proceedings of a symposium and workshop; 1978 April 25-28: Jamestown, ND. [Place of publication unknown]: [Publisher unknown]: I-1 to IV-2. [Sponsored by: North Dakota Chapter of The Wildlife Society; U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management; Fire in Multiple Use Management RD&A Program; and others]. [3600]
35. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No. 14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496]
36. Majek, Bradley A.; Erickson, Clair; Duke, William B. 1984. Tillage effects and environmental influences on quackgrass (Agropyron repens) rhizome growth. Weed Science. 32(3): 376-381. [17590]
37. Marten, G. C.; Sheaffer, C. C.; Wyse, D. L. 1987. Forage nutritive value and palatability of perennial weeds. Agronomy Journal. 79: 980-986. [3449]
38. Mitchell, W. W. 1982. Forage yield and quality of indigenous and introduced grasses at Palmer, Alaska. Agronomy Journal. 74: 899-905. [16172]
39. Olson, Wendell W. 1975. Effects of controlled burning on grassland within the Tewaukon National Wildlife Refuge. Fargo, ND: North Dakota University of Agriculture and Applied Science. 137 p. Thesis. [15252]
40. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
41. Risser, P. G.; Birney, E. C.; Blocker, H. D.; [and others]. 1981. The true prairie ecosystem. US/IBP Synthesis Series 16. Stroudsburg, PA: Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company. 557 p. [16874]
42. Roundy, Bruce A. 1987. Seedbed salinity and the establishment of range plants. In: Frasier, Gary W.; Evans, Raymond A., eds. Proceedings of symposium: "Seed and seedbed ecology of rangeland plants"; 1987 April 21-23; Tucson, AZ. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service: 68-81. [4062]
43. Stoller, E. W. 1977. Differential cold tolerance of quackgrass and johnsongrass rhizomes. Weed Science. 25(4): 348-351. [17422]
44. Taylor, Douglas R.; Aarssen, Lonnie W. 1988. An interpretation of phenotypic plasticity in Agropyron repens (Graminae). American Journal of Botany. 75(3): 401-413. [2812]
45. Toepfer, John E.; Eng, Robert L. 1988. Winter ecology of the greater prairie chicken. In: Bjugstad, Ardell J., technical coordinator. Prairie chickens on the Sheyenne National Grasslands [symposium proceedings]; 18 September 18; Crookston, MN. Gen. Tech. Rep. RM-159. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station: 32-48. [5201]
46. Truscott, Doreen R.; Currie, Pat O. 1987. Factors affecting dietary preferences for genotypes of a hybrid wheatgrass. Journal of Range Management. 40(6): 509-513. [3764]
47. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1982. National list of scientific plant names. Vol. 1. List of plant names. SCS-TP-159. Washington, DC. 416 p. [11573]
48. Warman, P. R. 1988. The Gays River Mine tailing revegetation study. Landscape and Urban Planning. 16: 283-288. [6122]
49. Weaver, T.; Lichthart, J.; Gustafson, D. 1990. Exotic invasion of timberline vegetation, Northern Rocky Mountains, USA. In: Schmidt, Wyman C.; McDonald, Kathy J., compilers. Proceedings--symposium on whitebark pine ecosystems: ecology and management of a high-mountain resource; 1989 March 29-31; Bozeman, MT. Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-270. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station: 208-213. [11688]
50. Woehler, Eugene E.; Martin, Mark A. 1978. Establishment of prairie grasses and forbs with the use of herbicides. In: Glenn-Lewin, David C.; Landers, Roger Q., Jr., eds. Proceedings, 5th Midwest prairie conference; 1976 August 22-24; Ames, IA. Ames, IA: Iowa State University: 131-138. [3367]
51. Barkworth, Mary E., ed. 2002. Manual of grasses for North America, [Online]. Utah State University (Producer). Available: http://herbarium.usu.edu/grassmanual/ [52642]


FEIS Home