Index of Species Information
SPECIES: Carex saxatilis
Introductory
SPECIES: Carex saxatilis
AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION :
Williams, Tara Y. 1990. Carex saxatilis. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online].
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service,
Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer).
Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [].
ABBREVIATION :
CARSAX
SYNONYMS :
Carex saxatilis var. major (Olney)
SCS PLANT CODE :
CASA10
CASAM
CASAM2
CASAR
CASAS7
COMMON NAMES :
russet sedge
TAXONOMY :
The currently accepted scientific name of russet sedge is Carex
saxatilis L. [21]. Varieties are [23]:
C. s. var. major Olney
C. s. var. miliaris (Michx.) Bailey
C. s. var. rhomalea Fern.
C. s. var. saxatilis
LIFE FORM :
Graminoid
FEDERAL LEGAL STATUS :
No special status
OTHER STATUS :
Russet sedge is rare in Glacier National Park, Montana [13].
Carex saxatilis var. major is ranked by The Nature Conservancy as
globally secure (G5) but imperiled in the state of Washington (S2).
DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE
SPECIES: Carex saxatilis
GENERAL DISTRIBUTION :
Russet sedge is circumboreal. Although essentially an arctic species,
its range extends south to Washington, Utah, Colorado, New York, and
Maine [6,9].
ECOSYSTEMS :
FRES23 Fir - spruce
FRES26 Lodgepole pine
FRES37 Mountain meadows
FRES44 Alpine
STATES :
AK CO ID ME MT NV UT WA WY AB
BC MB NB NS NT ON PQ YT
BLM PHYSIOGRAPHIC REGIONS :
6 Upper Basin and Range
8 Northern Rocky Mountains
9 Middle Rocky Mountains
11 Southern Rocky Mountains
KUCHLER PLANT ASSOCIATIONS :
K008 Lodgepole pine - subalpine forest
K015 Western spruce - fir forest
K052 Alpine meadows and barren
SAF COVER TYPES :
206 Engelmann spruce - subalpine fir
218 Lodgepole pine
SRM (RANGELAND) COVER TYPES :
NO-ENTRY
HABITAT TYPES AND PLANT COMMUNITIES :
Russet sedge can be a dominant in wetland meadow communities [14,16,17].
MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS
SPECIES: Carex saxatilis
IMPORTANCE TO LIVESTOCK AND WILDLIFE :
Russet sedge communities provide moderate herbage production (840 to
1,160 pounds per acre [720-1,305 kg/ha]). Cattle and elk use has been
noted. The wet soils it occurs in decrease its grazing value [7,16].
In Iceland it rates as very good pasturage, even in winter [10].
PALATABILITY :
The palatability of russet sedge is relatively low [7,8]. It is more
palatable than beaked sedge (Carex rostrata) and less palatable than
water sedge (Carex aquatilis) [16]. In Iceland it rates as very good
pasturage, even in winter [10].
NUTRITIONAL VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
COVER VALUE :
NO-ENTRY
VALUE FOR REHABILITATION OF DISTURBED SITES :
Russet sedge may be useful for revegetation of degraded riparian sites
at high elevations. Once established, it provides excellent soil
stability because of its long creeping rhizomes [7].
OTHER USES AND VALUES :
NO-ENTRY
OTHER MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
The russet sedge community type appears to be a stable one with species
compositions only slightly impacted by past livestock grazing. Because
of the organic, wet soils, use of heavy machinery should be avoided in
russet sedge communities [16].
BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS
SPECIES: Carex saxatilis
GENERAL BOTANICAL CHARACTERISTICS :
Russet sedge, a native perennial grasslike plant, grows 8 to 30 inches
(20-80 cm) tall. It is a turf-forming, perennial sedge with
well-developed, creeping rhizomes. It has separate staminate and
pistillate spikes. The achenes are trigonous. [7,9,21].
RAUNKIAER LIFE FORM :
Geophyte
REGENERATION PROCESSES :
Russet sedge reproduces vegetatively by rhizomes and sexually by seed
[7].
SITE CHARACTERISTICS :
Russet sedge grows in wet meadows and boggy areas, especially near
streams and lakes at high elevations [9,13,19,21]. It is often a
codominant in water sedge associations [16,17]. It is more common on
wetter than less wet sites [11]. Russet sedge grows on poorly developed
soils along shores and on organic substrates [7,16]. The water level
may be aboveground through spring and early summer [17]. Its
elevational range is 9,300 to 12,000 feet (2,835-3,660 m) in Utah and
Colorado and 4,800 to 5,600 feet (1,465-1,710 m) in Montana [2].
Russet sedge is often associated with water sedge and other sedges
(Carex spp.), bluejoint reedgrass (Calamagrostis canadensis), tufted
hairgrass (Deschamsia caespitosa), variableleaf pondweed (Potamogeton
gramineus), subalpine fir (Abies lasiocarpa), lodgepole pine (Pinus
contorta), Engelmann spruce (Picea engelmannii), and quaking aspen
(Populus tremuloides) [16,17].
SUCCESSIONAL STATUS :
NO-ENTRY
SEASONAL DEVELOPMENT :
Russet sedge has mature fruit in late July and August [13].
FIRE ECOLOGY
SPECIES: Carex saxatilis
FIRE ECOLOGY OR ADAPTATIONS :
Russet sedge occurs on sites with a low fire regime [13].
POSTFIRE REGENERATION STRATEGY :
Rhizomatous herb, rhizome in soil
FIRE EFFECTS
SPECIES: Carex saxatilis
IMMEDIATE FIRE EFFECT ON PLANT :
NO-ENTRY
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF FIRE EFFECT :
NO-ENTRY
PLANT RESPONSE TO FIRE :
NO-ENTRY
DISCUSSION AND QUALIFICATION OF PLANT RESPONSE :
NO-ENTRY
FIRE MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS :
NO-ENTRY
REFERENCES
SPECIES: Carex saxatilis
REFERENCES :
1. Bernard, Stephen R.; Brown, Kenneth F. 1977. Distribution of mammals,
reptiles, and amphibians by BLM physiographic regions and A.W. Kuchler's
associations for the eleven western states. Tech. Note 301. Denver, CO:
U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management. 169 p.
[434]
2. Dittberner, Phillip L.; Olson, Michael R. 1983. The plant information
network (PIN) data base: Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, Utah, and
Wyoming. FWS/OBS-83/86. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior,
Fish and Wildlife Service. 786 p. [806]
3. Ebersole, James J. 1987. Short-term vegetation recovery at an Alaskan
arctic coastal plain site. Arctic and Alpine Research. 19(4): 442-450.
[9476]
4. Eyre, F. H., ed. 1980. Forest cover types of the United States and
Canada. Washington, DC: Society of American Foresters. 148 p. [905]
5. Garrison, George A.; Bjugstad, Ardell J.; Duncan, Don A.; [and others].
1977. Vegetation and environmental features of forest and range
ecosystems. Agric. Handb. 475. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service. 68 p. [998]
6. Graff, Paul W. 1922. Unreported plants from Glacier National Park.
Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 49: 175-181. [12964]
7. Hansen, Paul L.; Chadde, Steve W.; Pfister, Robert D. 1988. Riparian
dominance types of Montana. Misc. Publ. No. 49. Missoula, MT: University
of Montana, School of Forestry, Montana Forest and Conservation
Experiment Station. 411 p. [5660]
8. Hermann, Frederick J. 1970. Manual of the Carices of the Rocky Mountains
and Colorado Basin. Agric. Handb. 374. Washington, DC: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service. 397 p. [1139]
9. Hitchcock, C. Leo; Cronquist, Arthur; Ownbey, Marion. 1959. Vascular
plants of the Pacific Northwest. Part 4: Ericaceae through
Campanulaceae. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press. 510 p.
[1170]
10. Ingvasson, P. A. 1969. The golden sedges of Iceland. World Crops. 21:
218-220. [14132]
11. Kershaw, K. A. 1974. Studies on lichen-dominated systems. X. The sedge
meadows of the coastal raised beaches. Canadian Journal of Botany. 52:
1947-1972. [12966]
12. Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Manual to accompany the map of potential vegetation
of the conterminous United States. Special Publication No. 36. New York:
American Geographical Society. 77 p. [1384]
13. Lesica, Peter. 1984. Rare vascular plants of Glacier National Park,
Montana. Missoula, MT: University of Montana, Department of Botany. 27
p. [12049]
14. Lewis, Mont E. 1970. Alpine rangelands of the Uinta Mountains. Ogden,
UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Region 4. 75 p.
[1451]
15. Lyon, L. Jack; Stickney, Peter F. 1976. Early vegetal succession
following large northern Rocky Mountain wildfires. In: Proceedings, Tall
Timbers fire ecology conference and Intermountain Fire Research Council
fire and land management symposium; 1974 October 8-10; Missoula, MT. No.
14. Tallahassee, FL: Tall Timbers Research Station: 355-373. [1496]
16. Padgett, Wayne G.; Youngblood, Andrew P.; Winward, Alma H. 1989.
Riparian community type classification of Utah and southeastern Idaho.
R4-Ecol-89-01. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest
Service, Intermountain Region. 191 p. [11360]
17. Pierce, John; Johnson, Janet. 1986. Wetland community type
classification for west-central Montana. Missoula, MT: U.S. Department
of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northern Region, Ecosystem Management
Program. 158 p. [Review draft]. [7436]
18. Raunkiaer, C. 1934. The life forms of plants and statistical plant
geography. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 632 p. [2843]
19. Voss, Edward G. 1972. Michigan flora. Part I. Gymnosperms and monocots.
Bloomfield Hills, MI: Cranbrook Institute of Science; Ann Arbor, MI:
University of Michigan Herbarium. 488 p. [11471]
20. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1994. Plants
of the U.S.--alphabetical listing. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 954 p. [23104]
21. Welsh, Stanley L.; Atwood, N. Duane; Goodrich, Sherel; Higgins, Larry
C., eds. 1987. A Utah flora. Great Basin Naturalist Memoir No. 9. Provo,
UT: Brigham Young University. 894 p. [2944]
22. Stickney, Peter F. 1989. Seral origin of species originating in northern
Rocky Mountain forests. Unpublished draft on file at: U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Forest Service, Intermountain Research Station, Fire
Sciences Laboratory, Missoula, MT; RWU 4403 files. 7 p. [20090]
23. Kartesz, John T. 1994. A synonymized checklist of the vascular flora of
the United States, Canada, and Greenland. Volume II--thesaurus. 2nd ed.
Portland, OR: Timber Press. 816 p. [23878]
24. Washington Natural Heritage Program, compiler. 1994. Endangered,
threatened, and sensitive vascular plants of Washington. Olympia, WA:
Department of Natural Resources. 52 p. [25413]
FEIS Home Page